94-18179. High Density Airports; Slot Use and Loss Requirements  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 144 (Thursday, July 28, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page ]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-18179]
    
    
    [Federal Register: July 28, 1994]
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part II
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of Transportation
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    14 CFR Part 93
    
    
    
    High Density Airports; Slot Use and Loss Requirements; Proposed Rule
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 93
    
    [Docket No. 27834, Notice No. 94-25]
    
    
    High Density Airports; Slot Use and Loss Requirements
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes to amend the Federal Aviation 
    Regulations pertaining to the slot use and loss provisions for air 
    carrier and commuter operator slots (i.e., instrument flight rules 
    takeoff and landing reservations) at Kennedy International Airport, 
    LaGuardia Airport, O'Hare International Airport, and Washington 
    National Airport. This proposal would codify the agency's historical 
    practice of treating as used, any slot held but not actually operated 
    on Thanksgiving Day, the Friday following Thanksgiving Day, and the 
    period from December 24 through January 2. The proposed revision would 
    permit carriers and commuters to choose which flights to operate at any 
    of the High Density Rule airports during certain days of the winter 
    holiday season without jeopardizing the status of the slots under the 
    ``use of lose'' requirement.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 26, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments on this regulation may be mailed in triplicate to: 
    Federal Aviation Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel, Rules 
    Docket (AGC-10), Docket No. 27834, 800 Independence Avenue SW., 
    Washington, DC 20591.
        Or delivered in triplicate to: Federal Aviation Administration, 
    Rules Docket, room 915, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
    20591.
        Comments may be examined in the Rules Docket weekdays, except 
    Federal holidays, between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Patricia R. Lane, Office of the Chief Counsel, AGC-230, Federal 
    Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
    20591; telephone (202) 267-3491.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the proposal by 
    submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. 
    Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and 
    suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned 
    decisions on the proposals. Comments are specifically invited on the 
    overall economic, energy, environmental, reporting, and recordkeeping 
    aspects of the proposals. Communications should identify the docket 
    number and be submitted in triplicate to the address above. Commenters 
    wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice 
    must submit with those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on 
    which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. 
    27834.'' Communications received on or before the specified closing 
    date for comments will be considered before taking any further action 
    on the proposals. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed 
    in light of comments received. All comments submitted will be available 
    for examination in the docket both before and after the closing date 
    for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with 
    FAA personnel concerned with this proposal will be filed in the docket.
    
    Availability of NPRM
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Public Affairs, 
    Attention: Public Inquiry Center, APA-430, 800 Independence Avenue SW., 
    Washington, DC 20591, or by calling (202) 267-3484. Communications must 
    identify the docket number of this NPRM. Persons interested in being 
    placed on a mailing list for future notices should also request a copy 
    of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, ``Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
    Distribution System,'' which describes the application procedures.
    
    Background
    
        The High Density Traffic Airport Rule, or ``High Density Rule,'' 14 
    CFR part 93, subpart K, was promulgated in 1969 to reduce delays at 
    five congested airports: JFK International, LaGuardia, O'Hare 
    International, Washington National, and Newark International (33 FR 
    17896; December 3, 1968). The regulation limits the number of IFR 
    operations at each airport, by hour or half hour (by half hour at 
    O'Hare), during certain hours of the day. It provides for the 
    allocation to carriers of operational authority, or a ``slot'' for each 
    instrument flight rule (IFR) landing or takeoff during a specific 30- 
    or 60-minute period. The restrictions were lifted at Newark in the 
    early 1970's.
        The proposed amendment would exempt certain holidays from being 
    included in the bimonthly calculations for slot use. Traditionally, air 
    carriers and commuters reduce their scheduled operations on the 
    following holidays: Thanksgiving Day, the Friday following 
    Thanksgiving, Christmas Day, and New Year's Day. Since December 1986, 
    commuter slot-operators have been allowed to temporarily discontinue 
    use of slots for Thanksgiving Day, the Friday following Thanksgiving 
    Day, and the period from December 24 through the first Saturday in 
    January of the new year. This policy was extended to air carrier 
    operators for the 1993 holiday season. There is no reason to expect 
    this agency's historical practice to change and it should be expressly 
    codified in the regulations.
        This proposed change in the rule would not result in any additional 
    flights or capacity at the four High Density Traffic Airports. This 
    proposal also would be in the public interest because it would permit 
    air carriers and commuters to choose which flights to operate during 
    the winter holiday season without jeopardizing the status of the slots 
    under the ``use or lose'' requirement.
    
    Regulatory Evaluation
    
        The FAA has determined that this rulemaking is not a ``significant 
    regulatory action,'' as defined by Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory 
    Planning and Review). The anticipated costs and benefits associated 
    with this proposed rule to amend part 93 of the Federal Aviation 
    Regulations (FAR) are shown below.
    
    Benefits
    
        The proposal would permit the non-operation of certain flights by 
    carriers and commuters operating at any of the High Density Rule 
    airports during certain days of the winter holiday season. But the air 
    carrier could still count those flights toward its slot usage 
    requirement. It would permit an air carrier that could not cover its 
    variable operating costs to not operate those flights and to still meet 
    the slot usage requirements for those particular days. The potential 
    benefits would be primarily cost savings to the airlines.
    
    Costs
    
        The proposed rule would not result in any added costs to the 
    affected air carriers. Fewer landings at the airports affected by this 
    rulemaking could result in reduced airport revenues derived from 
    landing fees. The FAA seeks comments on this issue.
    
    Initial Regulatory Flexibility Determination
    
        The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) ensures that small 
    entities are not unnecessarily and disproportionately burdened by 
    Government regulations. The RFA requires agencies to review rules that 
    may have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities. The FAA estimates that no small entity would incur 
    incremental compliance costs. Therefore, the FAA has determined that a 
    regulatory flexibility analysis is not necessary.
    
    International Trade Impact Assessment
    
        The proposed rule would neither have an effect on the sale of 
    foreign aviation products or services in the United States, nor would 
    it have an effect on the sale of U.S. products or services in foreign 
    countries. This is because the proposed rule would neither impose costs 
    on aircraft operators nor on U.S. or foreign aircraft manufacturers.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This proposal, if adopted, provides for no changes to the required 
    reporting of information by air carrier and commuter operators to the 
    FAA. Under the requirements of the Federal Paperwork Reduction Act, the 
    Office of Management and Budget has approved the information collection 
    provision of subpart S through August 31, 1995. OMB Approval Number 
    2120-0524 has been assigned to subpart S.
    
    Federalism Implications
    
        The proposals set forth herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the states, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the states, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    regulation, if adopted, would not have federalism implications 
    warranting the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
    Conclusion
    
        For the reasons set forth above, the FAA has determined that this 
    proposal (1) Would not be a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; and (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under 
    Department of Transportation Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 
    11034; February 26, 1979). Further, I certify that under the criteria 
    of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, this proposal would not have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 93
    
        Air traffic control, Airports, Navigation (air), Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, I propose 
    to amend Part 93 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 93) 
    as follows:
    
    PART 93--SPECIAL AIR TRAFFIC RULES AND AIRPORT TRAFFIC PATTERNS
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 93 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. app. 1302, 1303, 1348, 1354(a), 1421(a), 
    1424, 2451 et seq.; 49 U.S.C. 106(g).
    
        2. In Sec. 93.227, paragraph (a) is revised and a new paragraph (l) 
    is added to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 93.227  Slot use and loss.
    
        (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (g), and (l) of 
    this section, any slot not utilized 80 percent of the time over a 2-
    month period shall be recalled by the FAA.
    * * * * *
        (1) The FAA will treat as used any slot held by a carrier at a High 
    Density Traffic Airport on Thanksgiving Day, the Friday following 
    Thanksgiving Day, and the period from December 24 through January 2.
    * * * * *
        Issued in Washington, DC on July 19, 1994.
    David J. Hurley,
    Director, Office of Air Traffic System Management.
    [FR Doc. 94-18179 Filed 7-27-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/28/1994
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Document Number:
94-18179
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before September 26, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (None pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: July 28, 1994, Docket No. 27834, Notice No. 94-25
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 93.227