96-17295. Airworthiness Directives; Aerospace Technologies of Australia Pty Ltd. (formerly Government Aircraft Factory) Models N22B, N24A, and N22S Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 131 (Monday, July 8, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 35693-35695]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-17295]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 95-CE-103-AD]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Aerospace Technologies of Australia Pty 
    Ltd. (formerly Government Aircraft Factory) Models N22B, N24A, and N22S 
    Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) that would apply to Aerospace Technologies of Australia Pty Ltd. 
    (ASTA) Models N22B, N24A, and N22S airplanes that are not equipped with 
    a part number (P/N) 1E/N-12-57 fuselage stub fin plate (MOD N759). The 
    proposed action would require replacing the existing fuselage stub fin 
    plate with one of improved design, P/N 1E/N-12-57. Several reports of 
    cracks along the forward flange of the fuselage stub fin plate in the 
    area of Rib Water Line (WL) 138.87 prompted the proposed action. The 
    actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent structural 
    failure of the fuselage area caused by a cracked stub fin plate, which, 
    if not detected and corrected, could result in loss of control of the 
    airplane.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 6, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-CE-103-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 
    12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Comments may be inspected at 
    this location between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    holidays excepted.
    
    ADDRESSES: Service information that applies to the proposed AD may be 
    obtained from Aerospace Technologies of Australia Pty Ltd., ASTA 
    DEFENCE, Private Bag No. 4, Beach Road Lara 3212, Victoria, Australia. 
    This information also may be examined at the Rules Docket at the 
    address below. Send comments on the proposal in triplicate to the 
    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the 
    Assistant Chief Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-CE-103-AD, Room 
    1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Comments may be 
    inspected at this location between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through 
    Friday, holidays excepted.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ron Atmur, Aerospace Engineer, 
    FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount 
    Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712; telephone (310) 627-5224; 
    facsimile (310) 627-5210.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned 
    with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 95-CE-103-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-CE-103-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th 
    Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    
    Discussion
    
        The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), which is the 
    airworthiness authority for Australia, recently notified the FAA that 
    an unsafe condition may
    
    [[Page 35694]]
    
    exist on certain ASTA Models N22B, N24A, and N22S airplanes. The CASA 
    reports several incidents of cracks along the forward flange of the 
    fuselage stub fin plate in the area of Rib Water Line (WL) 138.87. 
    Investigation has revealed fretting and fatigue of this plate, part 
    number (P/N) 1D/N-12-57. These conditions, if not detected and 
    corrected, could result in structural failure of the fuselage area, 
    which could result in loss of control of the airplane.
        ASTA has issued Nomad Service Bulletin (SB) ANMD- 53-13, Revision 
    3, dated October 24, 1995, which specifies procedures for installing a 
    fuselage stub fin plate of improved design, P/N 1E/N-12-57.
        The CASA of Australia classified this service bulletin as mandatory 
    and issued FCAA AD/GAF-N22/63, amendment 1, dated July 1994, in order 
    to assure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in Australia.
        This airplane model is manufactured in Australia and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and 
    the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement, the CASA of Australia has kept the 
    FAA informed of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the 
    findings of the CASA of Australia, reviewed all available information 
    including the service information referenced above, and determined that 
    AD action is necessary for products of this type design that are 
    certificated for operation in the United States.
    
    Explanation of the Provisions of the Proposed AD
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop in other ASTA Models N22B, N24A, and N22S airplanes of 
    the same type design that are registered in the United States and are 
    not equipped with a P/N 1E/N-12-57 fuselage stub fin plate (MOD N759), 
    the proposed AD would require replacing the existing fuselage stub fin 
    plate with one of improved design, P/N 1E/N-12-57. Accomplishment of 
    the proposed installation would be in accordance with Nomad SB ANMD-53-
    13, Revision 3, dated October 24, 1995.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 15 airplanes in the U.S. registry would be 
    affected by the proposed AD, that it would take approximately 22 
    workhours per airplane to accomplish the proposed action, and that the 
    average labor rate is approximately $60 an hour. Parts cost 
    approximately $150 per airplane. Based on these figures, the total cost 
    impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $22,050 
    or $1,470 per airplane. This figure is based on the assumption that no 
    affected owner/operator of the affected airplanes has accomplished the 
    proposed replacement.
        ASTA has informed the FAA that it has no records of parts 
    distribution. The FAA believes that several of the affected airplanes 
    already have the proposed replacement incorporated, which would reduce 
    the cost impact upon the public.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, 
    will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a 
    substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation 
    prepared for this action has been placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of 
    it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location 
    provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40101, 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) to read as follows:
    
    Aerospace Technologies of Australia PTY Ltd: Docket No. 95-CE-103-
    AD.
    
        Applicability: Models N22B, N24A, and N22S airplanes (all serial 
    numbers), certificated in any category, that are not equipped with a 
    part number (P/N) 1E/N-12-57 fuselage stub fin plate (MOD N759).
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
        Compliance: Required within the next 100 hours time-in-service 
    after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished.
        To prevent structural failure of the fuselage area caused by a 
    cracked stub fin plate, which, if not detected and corrected, could 
    result in loss of control of the airplane, accomplish the following:
        (a) Replace the fuselage stub fin plate with one of improved 
    design, P/N 1E/N-12-57 (MOD N759), in accordance with the 
    ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS section of Nomad Service Bulletin ANMD-
    53-13, Revision 3, dated October 24, 1995.
        (b) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be 
    approved by the Manager, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard., Lakewood, California 90712. 
    The request shall be forwarded through an appropriate FAA 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
    
        (d) All persons affected by this directive may obtain copies of 
    the document referred to herein upon request to Aerospace 
    Technologies of Australia Pty Ltd., ASTA DEFENCE, Private Bag No. 4, 
    Beach Road Lara 3212, Victoria, Australia; or may examine this 
    document at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    
    
    [[Page 35695]]
    
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 25, 1996.
    James E. Jackson,
    Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 96-17295 Filed 7-5-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/08/1996
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
96-17295
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before September 6, 1996.
Pages:
35693-35695 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-CE-103-AD
PDF File:
96-17295.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13