95-20241. Maria Hollingsworth, Tulsa, Oklahoma; Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities and Requiring Certain Notification to NRC (Effective Immediately)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 16, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 42633-42635]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-20241]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    [Docket No. 030-31252, License No. 35-26996-01, IA 95-028]
    
    
    Maria Hollingsworth, Tulsa, Oklahoma; Order Prohibiting 
    Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities and Requiring Certain 
    Notification to NRC (Effective Immediately)
    
    I
    
        Maria Hollingsworth is the owner and operator of Blackhawk 
    Engineering, Inc. (Licensee or Blackhawk) and served as the radiation 
    safety officer with respect to its Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC 
    or Commission) license. Blackhawk was issued Byproduct Materials 
    License No. 35-26996-01 by the NRC, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 30, on 
    August 22, 1989. The license authorized Blackhawk to possess and 
    utilize sealed sources of radioactive material contained in moisture/
    density gauges in accordance with the conditions specified therein. The 
    license expired on August 31, 1994, and Blackhawk did not submit a 
    renewal application as provided in 10 CFR 30.37. On February 14, 1995, 
    the NRC issued an order requiring Blackhawk to cease use of, and 
    transfer, all NRC-licensed material in its possession to a person 
    authorized to receive and possess such material (EA 95-018). Blackhawk 
    complied with the terms of the order and on May 17, 1995, the NRC 
    issued a Notice of Termination of Blackhawk's NRC license.
    
    II
    
        The February 14, 1995 order was issued to Blackhawk because: (1) 
    Blackhawk continued to utilize gauges containing NRC-licensed material 
    after 
    
    [[Page 42634]]
    the NRC license had expired, and Ms. Hollingsworth had specifically 
    agreed not to utilize this material, as confirmed by a Confirmatory 
    Action Letter (CAL) from the NRC to Blackhawk on November 8, 1994; and 
    (2) Ms. Hollingsworth was not truthful in statements made to NRC 
    personnel regarding the continued use of the gauges. Ms. 
    Hollingsworth's actions were in violation of 10 CFR 30.10, a regulation 
    prohibiting deliberate misconduct by any licensee or employee of a 
    licensee. Deliberate misconduct includes an intentional act or omission 
    that a person knows would cause a licensee to be in violation of NRC 
    requirements, or deliberate submission to the NRC of material 
    information that the person submitting the information knows to be 
    incomplete or inaccurate. In brief, Ms. Hollingsworth violated 10 CFR 
    30.10 because, as she admitted to NRC investigators: (1) She understood 
    in November 1994 that she no longer was authorized to use the gauges 
    but did use the gauges until December 22, 1994, to complete a 
    construction job; and (2) she deliberately provided false information 
    when she told an NRC inspector on December 19, 1994 that she had not 
    used the gauges since 1992.
        On June 5, 1995, the NRC conducted a telephonic enforcement 
    conference with Ms. Hollingsworth to determine whether her deliberate 
    misconduct warranted enforcement action directly against her as an 
    individual. Ms. Hollingsworth stated that prior to November 1994, she 
    had responded to NRC inquiries regarding the renewal of Blackhawk's 
    license and believed that she had taken care of it. However, she 
    admitted that, after being contacted by the regional office in November 
    1994 and receiving a November 8, 1994 Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) 
    from NRC, she made a conscious decision to continue using the gauges, 
    contrary to the terms of the CAL, to complete a construction job. Ms. 
    Hollingsworth also stated that she did so without contacting the NRC 
    for further guidance or assistance because she believed that NRC would 
    not have allowed her to continue using licensed material. Ms. 
    Hollingsworth stated that she would comply with all NRC regulations in 
    the future.
    
    III
    
        Ms. Hollingsworth admits both to deliberately violating NRC 
    requirements by using NRC-licensed material after being made aware of 
    the expiration of Blackhawk's license, and to deliberately making a 
    false statement to an NRC inspector. Given Ms. Hollingsworth's position 
    as owner and operator of Blackhawk and her role as the radiation safety 
    officer with respect to the NRC license, the NRC considers her 
    deliberate misconduct particularly significant. NRC must be able to 
    rely on licensee management to comply with NRC requirements, especially 
    the requirement to provide accurate information to the NRC. Despite her 
    commitment to comply with NRC requirements in the future, Ms. 
    Hollingsworth's past deliberate misrepresentation to the NRC and 
    deliberate violation of other NRC requirements raise serious doubt as 
    to whether she can be relied upon to comply with NRC requirements in 
    the future, including the requirement to provide complete and accurate 
    information to the NRC.
        Consequently, I lack the requisite reasonable assurance that 
    licensed activities would be conducted in compliance with the 
    Commission's requirements and that the health and safety of the public 
    would be protected if Ms. Hollingsworth were permitted at this time to 
    be involved in NRC-licensed activities. Therefore, the public health, 
    safety and interest require that Ms. Hollingsworth be prohibited from 
    any involvement in NRC-licensed activities for a period of one year. 
    Additionally, Ms. Hollingsworth is required to notify the NRC of her 
    involvement in NRC-licensed activities for one year following the one 
    year prohibition period. Furthermore, pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202, I find 
    that the significance of Maria Hollingsworth's conduct described above 
    is such that the public health, safety and interest require that this 
    Order be immediately effective.
    
    IV
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to sections 81, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 
    of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's 
    regulations in 10 CFR 2.202, 10 CFR 30.10, and 10 CFR 150.20, it is 
    hereby ordered, effective immediately, that:
        1. Maria Hollingsworth is prohibited from engaging in NRC-licensed 
    activities for a period of one year from the date of this Order. NRC-
    licensed activities are those activities that are conducted pursuant to 
    a specific or general license issued by the NRC, including, but not 
    limited to, those activities of Agreement State licensees conducted 
    pursuant to the authority granted by 10 CFR 150.20.
        2. For a period of one year after the one year period of 
    prohibition has expired, Maria Hollingsworth shall, within 20 days of 
    her acceptance of each employment offer involving NRC-licensed 
    activities, or her becoming involved in NRC-licensed activities as 
    defined in Paragraph IV.1 above, provide notice to the Director, Office 
    of Enforcement, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
    20555, of the name, address, and telephone number of the employer or 
    the entity where she is, or will be, involved in NRC-licensed 
    activities. In the first notification, Ms. Hollingsworth shall include 
    a statement of her commitment to compliance with NRC requirements and 
    the basis why the Commission should have confidence that she will now 
    comply with applicable NRC requirements.
        The Director, Office of Enforcement, may, in writing, relax or 
    rescind any of the above conditions upon demonstration by Ms. 
    Hollingsworth of good cause.
    
    V
    
        In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, Maria Hollingsworth must, and any 
    other person adversely affected by this Order may, submit an answer to 
    this Order, and may request a hearing on this Order, within 20 days of 
    the date of this Order. Where good cause is shown, consideration will 
    be given to extending the time to request a hearing. A request for 
    extension of time must be made in writing to the Director, Office of 
    Enforcement, and include a statement of good cause for the extension. 
    The answer may consent to this Order. Unless the answer consents to 
    this Order, the answer shall, in writing and under oath or affirmation, 
    specifically admit or deny each allegation or charge made in this Order 
    and shall set forth the matters of fact and law on which Ms. 
    Hollingsworth or other person adversely affected relies and the reasons 
    as to why the Order should not have been issued. Any answer or request 
    for a hearing shall be submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear 
    Regulatory Commission, Attn: Chief, Docketing and Service Section, 
    Washington, DC 20555. Copies also shall be sent to the Director, Office 
    of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
    20555; to the Assistant General Counsel for Hearings and Enforcement at 
    the same address; to the Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV, 611 
    Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011; and to Ms. 
    Hollingsworth if the answer or hearing request is by a person other 
    than Ms. Hollingsworth. If a person other than Ms. Hollingsworth 
    requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with particularity the 
    manner in which his or her interest is adversely affected by this Order 
    and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.714(d). 
    
    [[Page 42635]]
    
        If a hearing is requested by Ms. Hollingsworth or a person whose 
    interest is adversely affected, the Commission will issue an Order 
    designating the time and place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, 
    the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Order 
    should be sustained.
        Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202(c)(2)(i), Maria Hollingsworth, or any 
    other person adversely affected by this Order may, in addition to 
    demanding a hearing, at the time the answer is filed or sooner, move 
    the presiding officer to set aside the immediate effectiveness of the 
    Order on the ground that the Order, including the need for immediate 
    effectiveness, is not based on adequate evidence but on mere suspicion, 
    unfounded allegations, or error.
        In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of 
    an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions 
    specified in Section IV above shall be effective and final 20 days from 
    the date of this Order without further order or proceedings. If an 
    extension of time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the 
    provisions specified in Part IV shall be final when the extension 
    expires if a hearing request has not been received. An answer or a 
    request for a hearing shall not stay the immediate effectiveness of 
    this Order.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 3rd day of August 1995.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    James Lieberman,
    Director, Office of Enforcement.
    [FR Doc. 95-20241 Filed 8-15-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/16/1995
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-20241
Pages:
42633-42635 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 030-31252, License No. 35-26996-01, IA 95-028
PDF File:
95-20241.pdf