97-22146. Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Aircraft Company Model 1900D Airplanes (Formerly Known as Beech Aircraft Corporation Model 1900D Airplanes)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 44404-44406]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-22146]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 97-CE-73-AD; Amendment 39-10111; AD 97-17-08]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon Aircraft Company Model 1900D 
    Airplanes (Formerly Known as Beech Aircraft Corporation Model 1900D 
    Airplanes)
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that 
    is applicable to Raytheon Aircraft Company (Raytheon) Model 1900D 
    airplanes (formerly known as Beech Aircraft Corporation Model 1900D 
    airplanes) that have not had the propeller removed and re-installed 
    since factory installation. This action requires inspecting the 
    propeller mounting bolts for the proper torque and replacing or re-
    torquing any propeller bolt with the wrong torque level. The 
    manufacturer discovered some under-torqued propeller mounting bolts 
    during factory installation of the propeller. The actions specified by 
    this AD are intended to prevent fatigue cracking and failure of the 
    propeller mounting bolts, which if not detected and corrected, could 
    result in loss of the propeller.
    
    DATES: Effective September 24, 1997.
        Comments for inclusion in the rules docket must be received on or 
    before October 30, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket 97-CE-73-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th 
    Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
        Service information that applies to this AD may be obtained from 
    Raytheon Aircraft Company, 9709 E. Central, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, 
    Kansas 67201-0085. This information may also be examined at the Federal 
    Aviation Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant 
    Chief Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket 97-CE-73-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 
    12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Randy Griffith, Aerospace 
    Engineer, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, Room 100, 1801 Airport 
    Rd., Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316) 946-4145; facsimile (316) 
    946-4407.
    
    [[Page 44405]]
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Discussion
    
        The FAA has received three reports from operators and has recently 
    been notified by Raytheon Aircraft Company (Raytheon) (formerly known 
    as Beech Aircraft Corporation) that certain Raytheon Model 1900D 
    airplane propellers were inadvertently installed with under-torqued 
    propeller mounting bolts at factory installation. The bolts were not 
    being torqued to the end torque requirement of 100 to 105 ft-lbs. These 
    bolts have a three stage, wet torque requirement ending at a value of 
    100 to 105 ft-lbs. Originally it was believed that the bolts were being 
    torqued to at least 80 ft-lbs (the second stage of the torque 
    procedure), but three cases of bolts with less than 60 ft-lbs have been 
    reported. The manufacturer of the propeller and Raytheon notified the 
    owners/operators of the affected Model 1900D airplanes (serial numbers 
    (S/N) UE-176 through UE-280, UE-282 and UE-284) by ``urgent action'' 
    letter. If the propeller bolts are not torqued to the right level, 
    fatigue cracking could result.
    
    Relevant Service Information
    
        Raytheon has issued an urgent action Letter No. 52-0092, dated July 
    22, 1997, which references the propeller bolt torque problem and the 
    recommended action to fix the torque levels.
    
    The FAA's Determination
    
        After examining the circumstances and reviewing all available 
    information related to the incidents described above, including the 
    relevant service information, the FAA has determined that AD action 
    should be taken to prevent fatigue cracking and failure of the 
    propeller mounting bolts, which if not detected and corrected, could 
    result in loss of the propeller.
    
    Explanation of the Provisions of the AD
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop in certain Raytheon Model 1900D airplanes of the same 
    type design that have not had the propeller removed and re-installed, 
    this AD requires inspecting the propeller mounting bolts for correct 
    torque level, and re-torquing or replacing the bolts as necessary.
    
    Determination of the Effective Date of the AD
    
        Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of 
    this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for public 
    prior comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for 
    making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves 
    requirements affecting immediate flight safety and, thus, was not 
    preceded by notice and opportunity to comment, comments are invited on 
    this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by 
    submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. 
    Communications should identify the rules docket number and be submitted 
    in triplicate to the address specified above. All communications 
    received on or before the closing date for comments will be considered, 
    and this rule may be amended in light of the comments received. Factual 
    information that supports the commenter's ideas and suggestions is 
    extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the AD action and 
    determining whether additional rulemaking action would be needed.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might 
    suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be 
    available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the 
    rules docket for examination by interested persons. A report that 
    summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this 
    AD will be filed in the rules docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 97-CE-73-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency 
    regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe 
    condition in aircraft, and is not a significant regulatory action under 
    Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further that this action 
    involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is determined that 
    this emergency regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final regulatory evaluation will 
    be prepared and placed in the rules docket (otherwise, an evaluation is 
    not required). A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the rules 
    docket.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) to read as follows:
    
    97-17-08. Raytheon Aircraft Company: Amendment 39-10111; Docket No. 
    97-CE-73-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 1900D airplanes (serial numbers UE-176 
    through UE-280, UE-282 and UE-284) certificated in any category, 
    that have not had the propeller removed and re-installed since 
    factory installation, or have not had the attaching bolts re-
    torqued.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required within the next 50 hours time-in-service 
    (TIS), unless already accomplished (accomplished according to 
    Raytheon Aircraft Company Letter No. 52-0092, dated July 22, 1997).
        To prevent fatigue cracking and failure of the propeller 
    mounting bolts, which if not detected and corrected, could result in 
    loss of the propeller, accomplish the following:
    
    [[Page 44406]]
    
        (a) Accomplish the following if the airplane records indicate 
    that the propeller has not been removed and re-installed since the 
    factory installation.
        (1) Remove spinner dome, cowling, and hardware as required to 
    access propeller attachment bolts.
        (2) Reposition the beta system, using beta positioning tool, and 
    remove the safety wire from the propeller mounting bolts (part 
    number (P/N) B3347).
        (3) Check the torque level of the P/N B3347 propeller bolts.
        (i) If the torque is less than 60 ft-lbs, prior to further 
    flight, replace the bolts with another FAA-approved propeller bolt 
    using the installation procedures and torque sequence detailed in 
    the Model 1900D Maintenance Manual (61-10-00) (A/Steps 1, 2, and B/
    Step 3).
        (ii) If torque is 60 ft-lbs or greater, torque the bolts to a 
    value of 100-105 ft-lbs using the torque sequence detailed in the 
    Model 1900D Maintenance Manual (61-10-00) (B/Step 3).
        (4) Re-safety wire the propeller bolts and remove the beta 
    system positioning tool.
        (5) Re-install the hardware, the spinner, and the cowlings.
        (b) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be 
    approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, Room 
    100, 1801 Airport Rd., Wichita, Kansas 67209. The request shall be 
    forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may 
    add comments and then send it to the Manager, Wichita Aircraft 
    Certification Office.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from Wichita Aircraft Certification Office.
    
        (d) Information related to this AD may be inspected at the FAA, 
    Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Room 1558, 
    601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
        (e) This amendment (39-10111) becomes effective on September 24, 
    1997.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 14, 1997.
    Michael Gallagher,
    Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 97-22146 Filed 8-20-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/24/1997
Published:
08/21/1997
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; request for comments.
Document Number:
97-22146
Dates:
Effective September 24, 1997.
Pages:
44404-44406 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 97-CE-73-AD, Amendment 39-10111, AD 97-17-08
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
97-22146.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13