96-21745. Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Model F27 Mark 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 700 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 27, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 44004-44006]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-21745]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 96-NM-80-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Model F27 Mark 100, 200, 300, 
    400, 500, 600, and 700 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to all Fokker Model F27 Mark 100, 
    200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 700 series airplanes. This proposal would 
    require replacement of certain rudder horn assemblies with a new 
    assembly. For certain airplanes, the proposed AD also would require 
    replacement of certain rudder control rods with a new rod. This 
    proposal is prompted by reports of cracked rudder horns and a cracked 
    rudder control rod, caused by impact overload. The actions specified by 
    the proposed AD are intended to prevent such an overload and consequent 
    cracking of the subject parts, which could result in reduced structural 
    integrity of the rudder horn assembly or loss of rudder control; this 
    condition could lead to reduced controllability of the airplane.
    
    
    [[Page 44005]]
    
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by October 7, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 96-NM-80-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this location 
    between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
    holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Fokker Aircraft USA, Inc., 1199 North Fairfax Street, 
    Alexandria, Virginia 22314. This information may be examined at the 
    FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth Harder, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 
    227-1721; fax (206) 227-1149.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 96-NM-80-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 96-NM-80-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        The Rijksluchtvaartdienst (RLD), which is the airworthiness 
    authority for the Netherlands, recently notified the FAA that an unsafe 
    condition may exist on all Fokker Model F27 Mark 100, 200, 300, 400, 
    500, 600, and 700 series airplanes. The RLD advises it has received 
    reports of cracked rudder horns and a cracked rudder control rod found 
    on these airplanes. Investigation revealed the cause of such cracking 
    has been attributed to an impact overload on the rudder horn assembly. 
    The existing design of the rudder horn assembly allows the rudder to 
    swing around in heavy gust conditions. The inertia of the rudder 
    swinging movement can cause an impact overload when one of the rudder 
    limit stops is hit. This condition, if not corrected, could result in 
    reduced structural integrity of the rudder horn assembly or loss of 
    rudder control, and, consequently, lead to reduced controllability of 
    the airplane.
    
    Explanation of Relevant Service Information
    
        Fokker has issued Service Bulletin F27/27-131, Revision 1, dated 
    June 15, 1994, which describes procedures for replacement of the rudder 
    horn assembly, having part number (P/N) 3401-042-901 or -401, with a 
    new rudder horn assembly, having P/N F3402-070-407. The new rudder horn 
    is made of a stronger aluminum alloy material. Additionally, for 
    certain airplanes, the service bulletin recommends replacement of the 
    rudder control rod, having P/N 5233-018-xxx, with a new rudder control 
    rod, having P/N F8507-052-403. The new control rod contains regreasable 
    bearings which are less sensitive to seizure. The RLD classified this 
    service bulletin as mandatory and issued Dutch airworthiness directive 
    BLA 94-105 (A), dated August 5, 1994, in order to assure the continued 
    airworthiness of these airplanes in the Netherlands.
    
    FAA's Conclusion
    
        This airplane model is manufactured in the Netherlands and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and 
    the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement, the RLD has kept the FAA informed of 
    the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of the 
    RLD, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action 
    is necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for 
    operation in the United States.
    
    Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design, the 
    proposed AD would require replacement of certain rudder horn assemblies 
    with a new rudder horn assembly. For certain airplanes, the proposed AD 
    also would require replacement of certain rudder control rods with a 
    new rudder control rod. The actions would be required to be 
    accomplished in accordance with the service bulletin described 
    previously.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 34 Fokker Model F27 Mark 100, 200, 300, 400, 
    500, 600, and 700 series airplanes of U.S. registry would be affected 
    by this proposed AD.
        It would take approximately 7 work hours per airplane to accomplish 
    the proposed replacement of the rudder horn assembly, at an average 
    labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required parts would cost 
    approximately $2,565 per airplane. Based on these figures, the cost 
    impact of the replacement of the rudder horn assembly proposed by this 
    AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $101,490, or $2,985 per 
    airplane.
        There currently are no Fokker Model F27 Mark 100, 200, 300, 400, 
    500, 600, or 700 series airplanes on the U.S. Register that would 
    require the replacement of the rudder control rod. The only airplanes 
    that would require this replacement currently are operated by non-U.S. 
    operators under foreign registry; therefore, they are not directly 
    affected by this AD action. However, the FAA considers that inclusion 
    of that requirement in this proposed rule is necessary to ensure that 
    the unsafe condition is addressed in the event that any of these 
    airplanes are imported and placed on the U.S. Register in the future.
        Should any of those airplanes (having serial numbers 10102, and 
    10105 through 10165, inclusive) be imported and placed on the U.S. 
    Register in the future, it would take approximately 5 work hours per 
    airplane to accomplish the proposed replacement of the rudder control 
    rod, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required parts 
    would cost approximately $635 per
    
    [[Page 44006]]
    
    airplane. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the replacement of 
    the rudder control rod proposed by this AD on U.S. operators is 
    estimated to be $935 per airplane.
        The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions 
    that no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements 
    of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions 
    in the future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    Fokker: Docket 96-NM-80-AD.
        Applicability: All Model F27 Mark 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 
    and 700 series airplanes, certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent an impact overload and consequent cracking of the 
    subject parts, which could result in reduced structural integrity of 
    the rudder horn assembly or loss of rudder control, and, 
    consequently, lead to reduced controllability of the airplane, 
    accomplish the following:
        (a) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, 
    accomplish paragraph (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this AD, as applicable, in 
    accordance with Fokker Service Bulletin F27/27-131, Revision 1, 
    dated June 15, 1994.
        (1) For all airplanes: Replace the rudder horn assembly, having 
    part number (P/N) 3401-042-901 or 3401-042-401, with a new rudder 
    horn assembly, having P/N F3402-070-407, in accordance with Part 1 
    of the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin.
        (2) For airplanes having serial numbers 10102, and 10105 through 
    10165 inclusive: Replace the rudder control rod, having P/N 5233-
    018-xxx, with a new rudder control rod, having P/N F8507-052-403, in 
    accordance with Part 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of the 
    service bulletin.
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, 
    FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their 
    requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, 
    who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, 
    Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 20, 1996.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 96-21745 Filed 8-26-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/27/1996
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
96-21745
Dates:
Comments must be received by October 7, 1996.
Pages:
44004-44006 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96-NM-80-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
96-21745.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13