95-21610. Cable Television Service; List of Major Television Markets  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 169 (Thursday, August 31, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 45375-45376]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-21610]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
    47 CFR Part 76
    
    [MM Docket No. 93-304; DA 95-1850]
    
    
    Cable Television Service; List of Major Television Markets
    
    AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Commission, through this action, amends its rules 
    regarding the listing of major television markets to change the 
    designation of the Los Angeles-San Bernardino-Corona-Fontana-Riverside, 
    California television market to include the community of Anaheim, 
    California. This action is taken at the request of Golden Orange 
    Broadcasting Company, licensee of television station KDOC-TV, channel 
    56, Anaheim, California.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: October 2, 1995.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    William H. Johnson, Cable Services Bureau, (202) 416-0800.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
    Report and Order, MM Docket No. 93-304, adopted May 16, 1995 and 
    released August 28, 1995. The complete text of this document is 
    available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
    the FCC Reference Center (room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 
    20554, and may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, 
    International Transcription Service, (202) 857-3800, 1919 M Street, 
    NW., Washington, DC 20554.
    
    Synopsis of the Report and Order
    
        a. Before the Commission is the Notice of Proposed Rule Making in 
    the captioned proceeding, 58 FR 68844, December 29, 1993, issued in 
    response to a petition filed by Golden Orange Broadcasting Co., 
    licensee of television station KDOC-TV, channel 56, Anaheim, California 
    (``KDOC'') and the comments received in response thereto. The Notice 
    proposed to amend Sec. 76.51 of the Commission's rules, to change the 
    designation of the Los Angeles-San Bernardino-Corona-Fontana-Riverside, 
    California television market to ``Los Angeles-San Bernardino-Corona-
    Fontana-Riverside-Anaheim, California.'' Community Cablevision Company, 
    d/b/a/ Dimension Cable Services (``Dimension Cable''), a cable 
    television system operator providing service to Newport Beach, Irvine, 
    Tustin, and Orange, the University of California, Irvine and the Marine 
    Corps Air Stations in Tustin and El Toro filed comments, to which KDOC 
    filed a reply.
    
    Background
    
        2. Section 76.51 of the Commission's rules enumerates the top 100 
    television markets and the designated communities within those markets. 
    Among other things, this market list is used to determine the scope of 
    territorial exclusivity rights that television broadcast stations may 
    purchase and, in addition, may help define the scope of compulsory 
    copyright license liability for cable operators in certain 
    circumstances. Certain cable television syndicated exclusivity and 
    network nonduplication rights are also determined by the presence of 
    broadcast station communities of license on this list. Some of the 
    markets consist of more than one named community (a ``hyphenated 
    market''). Such ``hyphenation'' of a market is based on the premise 
    that stations licensed to any of the named communities in the 
    hyphenated market do, in fact, compete with all stations licensed to 
    such communities. Market hyphenation ``helps equalize competition'' 
    where portions of the market are located beyond the Grade B contours of 
    some stations in the area yet the stations compete for economic 
    support.
        3. Section 4 of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and 
    Competition Act of 1992 (``Cable Act''), which amended section 614 of 
    the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), requires the 
    Commission to make revisions needed to update the list of top 100 
    television markets and their designated communities in Sec. 76.51 of 
    the Commission's rules.
    
    Notice of Proposed Rule Making
    
        4. The Notice of Proposed Rule Making in this proceeding noted that 
    Anaheim was in the center of the Los Angeles market, 21 miles from 
    downtown Los Angeles and virtually encompassed within the combined 35-
    mile zones of San Bernardino, Corona and Fontana and that KDOC-TV's 
    Grade B signal contour encompasses all of the designated communities in 
    the market. Its Grade B signal contour, the Notice indicated, was 
    similar in location and coverage to the Grade B contours of other 
    market-area stations. Further, KDOC-TV's transmitter is located at the 
    same Sunset Ridge site as those of television stations KSCI and KZKI 
    which are licensed to San Bernardino.
    
    Rule Making Comments
    
        5. Petitioner KDOC filed brief comments in support of the requested 
    change in the rules stating that ``there is 
    
    [[Page 45376]]
    sufficient commonality between Anaheim and the existing communities in 
    the television market to merit the inclusion of Anaheim in that 
    market.'' Dimension Cable in its comments incorporated by reference 
    comments it had filed in Docket 93-209, a proceeding involving the New 
    York television market in which parties had been invited to address 
    issues relating to market hyphenation in large and complex markets like 
    the New York and Los Angeles markets. In those comments Dimension 
    argued that television stations in large markets were constrained in 
    seeking to exercise mandatory cable carriage rights by copyright 
    payment obligations outside of the market area defined by Sec. 76.51 of 
    the Commission's rules. It then argued:
    
        Had Congress intended to relieve broadcast stations of potential 
    copyright liability in order to qualify for must carry status, it 
    could have required wholesale revisions to Sec. 76.51 of the 
    Commission rules or amended section 111 of the Copyright Act. Rather 
    than doing so, Congress expressed its intent not to work any 
    fundamental changes in the copyright law. As commenters in this 
    proceeding have urged, the Commission should not now allow stations 
    to obtain must carry rights (and end-run the statute) through market 
    redesignation * * * (footnotes omitted).
    
    Thus, it urged the Commission not to adopt the proposed market 
    redesignation.
    Discussion
    
        6. A ``hyphenated market'' has been described by the Commission as 
    a television market that contains more than one major population center 
    supporting all stations in the market, with competing stations licensed 
    to different cities within the market area. In evaluating past requests 
    for hyphenation of a market, the Commission has considered the 
    following as relevant to its examination: (1) The distance between the 
    existing designated communities and the community proposed to be added 
    to the designation; (2) whether cable carriage, if afforded to the 
    subject station, would extend to areas beyond its Grade B signal 
    coverage area (a concern which has reduced relevance under the must 
    carry rules promulgated as a result of the 1992 Cable Act); (3) the 
    presence of a clear showing of a particularized need by the station 
    requesting the change of market designation; and (4) an indication of 
    benefit to the public from the proposed change. Each of these factors 
    helps the Commission to evaluate individual market conditions 
    consistent ``with the underlying competitive purpose of the market 
    hyphenation rule to delineate areas where stations can and do, both 
    actually and logically, compete.''
        7. Based on the facts set forth in the Notice of Rulemaking, which 
    have not been disputed by the comments herein, and on the responsive 
    comments, we believe that a case for redesignation of the subject 
    market has been set forth so that this proposal should be adopted. It 
    appears from the information before us that television stations 
    licensed to Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Corona, Riverside and Anaheim 
    do compete in the proposed combined market area, and that sufficient 
    evidence has been presented to demonstrate commonality between the 
    proposed community to be added to the market designation and the market 
    as a whole. Such a rationalization of the competitive situation appears 
    to be the public benefit which Congress anticipated by instructing the 
    Commission, in section 614(f) of the Cable Television Consumer 
    Protection and Competition Act of 1992, to make necessary revisions to 
    update the market list. This action, moreover, is entirely consistent 
    with the Report and Order in Docket 93-207, 58 FR 67694, December 22, 
    1993, which added Riverside as a designated community in the market.
        8. The issue raised by Dimension Cable regarding copyright 
    liability has largely been resolved with the passage of the Satellite 
    Home Viewer Act of 1994, which amended section 111(f) of title 17, 
    United States Code. Under this Act, a station located within the same 
    ADI as a cable system is no longer considered a ``distant signal'' on 
    that system for purposes of compulsory copyright license liability and, 
    therefore, is not subject to the additional copyright fees attendant to 
    ``distant signal'' carriage within the market. Thus, the issue raised 
    by Dimension has now been directly addressed by Congress and is not an 
    obstacle to the action proposed in this proceeding.
        9. As an additional matter, since no station is licensed to 
    Fontana, however, and since only communities with licensed stations 
    have ``specified zones'' (Sec. 76.5(e)) and contribute to the area and 
    coverage of a hyphenated market (Sec. 76.5(f)), reference to it will be 
    eliminated from Sec. 76.51.
        10. Accordingly, it is ordered, that effective October 2, 1995, 
    Sec. 76.51 of the Commission's rules is amended to include Anaheim and 
    delete Fontana as follows:
    
        Los Angeles-San Bernardino-Corona-Riverside-Anaheim, California.
    
        11. It is further ordered, that this proceeding is terminated.
        12. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by 
    Sec. 0.321 of the Commission's rules. 47 CFR 0.321.
    
    List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 76
    
        Cable Television.
    
        Part 76, Chapter I of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations 
    is amended as follows:
    
    PART 76--CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE
    
        1. The authority citation for part 76 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303.
    
        2. Section 76.51 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(28) to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 76.51  Major television markets.
    
    * * * * *
        (a) * * *
        (28) Los Angeles-San Bernardino-Corona-Riverside-Anaheim, 
    California.
    * * * * *
    Federal Communications Commission.
    William H. Johnson,
    Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau.
    [FR Doc. 95-21610 Filed 8-30-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
10/2/1995
Published:
08/31/1995
Department:
Federal Communications Commission
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-21610
Dates:
October 2, 1995.
Pages:
45375-45376 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
MM Docket No. 93-304, DA 95-1850
PDF File:
95-21610.pdf
CFR: (2)
47 CFR 0.321
47 CFR 76.51