99-20059. Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-400 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 152 (Monday, August 9, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 43053-43056]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-20059]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 99-NM-61-AD; Amendment 39-11245; AD 99-16-10]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-400 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain Boeing Model 747-400 series airplanes. This 
    action requires repetitive inspections of the E-42 satellite 
    communications (SATCOM) rack and fuselage (supporting) structure to 
    detect fatigue cracking of the area surrounding the fastener holes, and 
    to detect broken or missing fasteners; and corrective actions, if 
    necessary. This amendment is prompted by reports indicating that 
    fatigue cracking and broken and/or missing fasteners were found on the 
    E-42 SATCOM equipment rack structure that attaches to the fuselage 
    structure. The actions specified in this AD are intended to detect and 
    repair fatigue cracking of the E-42 SATCOM rack and its supporting 
    structure, which could result in the SATCOM equipment falling from the 
    rack, loss of SATCOM capabilities, injury to passengers, and reduced 
    controllability of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective August 24, 1999.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of August 24, 1999.
        Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or 
    before October 8, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 99-NM-61-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056.
        The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from 
    Flight Structures Inc., 4407 172nd Street NE, Arlington, Washington 
    98223. This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
    Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California; or at the 
    Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 
    700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon Mowery, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los 
    Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, 
    Lakewood, California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5322; fax (562) 
    627-5210.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has received reports indicating that 
    cracking and broken and/or missing fasteners were found on the E-42 
    SATCOM equipment rack structure that attaches to the fuselage structure 
    on several Boeing Model 747-300 and -400 series airplanes. 
    Investigation revealed that one of the four stanchions (i.e., a
    
    [[Page 43054]]
    
    supporting prop or brace) was found completely broken on two airplanes 
    (one that had accumulated 23,693 total flight hours and the other with 
    24,752 total flight hours). Further investigation revealed that the 
    rigid joints of the supporting structure of the E-42 SATCOM rack, 
    coupled with environmental vibration of the airplane, may have caused 
    the cracking to initiate in the area surrounding the fastener holes 
    (located at the rigid joints) of the supporting structure of the E-42 
    SATCOM rack. The FAA also has received a report indicating that 
    cracking has been detected on four freighter airplanes; one of the 
    airplanes had accumulated less than 1,500 total flight hours.
        On all airplanes, the E-42 SATCOM rack hangs above the main deck 
    ceiling. On freighter airplanes and ``combi'' airplanes (i.e., 
    configurations with provisions for passenger seating and cargo on the 
    main deck), the E-42 SATCOM rack is located near rudder and elevator 
    control cables, and the SATCOM wires run above the rudder and elevator 
    control cables.
        On all airplanes, failure of the rack and its supporting structure 
    could result in loss of support for the E-42 SATCOM equipment, which 
    could lead to chafing and arcing of the electrical wires and loss of 
    SATCOM capabilities. Such failure also could result in the following 
    unsafe conditions:
         On passenger-only airplanes, the E-42 SATCOM equipment 
    could break through the ceiling, which could result in injury to 
    passengers.
         On freighter and ``combi'' airplanes, the E-42 SATCOM 
    equipment could fall and cause the SATCOM wires to pull and possibly 
    break the rudder and/or elevator control cables, which could result in 
    reduced controllability of the airplane. Failure of the SATCOM rack on 
    ``combi'' airplanes carrying passengers also could result in injury to 
    the passengers.
    
    Related Rulemaking
    
        On June 22, 1999, the FAA issued AD 99-14-04, amendment 39-11212 
    (64 FR 34707, June 29, 1999), applicable to certain Boeing Model 747-
    300 and -400 series airplanes, that requires repetitive inspections of 
    the E-42 SATCOM rack and fuselage (supporting) structure to detect 
    cracking in the area surrounding the fastener holes, and to detect 
    broken and missing fasteners; and corrective actions, if necessary.
    
    Explanation of Relevant Service Information
    
        The FAA has reviewed and approved Flight Structures Alert Service 
    Bulletins 92FS024-53-A1, 92FS082-53-A1, and 94FS409-53-A2, all dated 
    March 2, 1999, and 94FS448-53-A1, dated February 12, 1999. These alert 
    service bulletins describe, among other things, procedures for a one-
    time close visual inspection of the E-42 SATCOM rack and fuselage 
    (supporting) structure to detect fatigue cracking of the area 
    surrounding the fastener holes, and to detect broken or missing 
    fasteners.
    
    Explanation of Requirements of the Rule
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design, this AD is 
    being issued to detect and repair fatigue cracking of the E-42 SATCOM 
    rack and its supporting structure due to environmental vibration of the 
    airplane. Such fatigue cracking could result in the SATCOM equipment 
    falling from the rack, loss of SATCOM capabilities, injury to 
    passengers, and reduced controllability of the airplane. This AD 
    requires repetitive inspections of the E-42 SATCOM rack and fuselage 
    (supporting) structure to detect fatigue cracking of the area 
    surrounding the fastener holes, and to detect broken or missing 
    fasteners; and corrective actions, if necessary. The actions are 
    required to be accomplished in accordance with the applicable alert 
    service bulletin described previously, except as discussed below. This 
    AD also would require reporting the findings of the initial inspection 
    to the FAA.
    
    Differences Between AD and Service Information
    
        While the alert service bulletins do not specify that the 
    inspection of the E-42 SATCOM rack and fuselage (supporting) structure 
    be repeated, this AD would require repetitive inspections of the E-42 
    SATCOM rack and fuselage (supporting) structure, even if fatigue 
    cracking has been detected and repaired. As stated previously, the 
    rigid joints of the SATCOM rack coupled with environmental vibration of 
    the airplane could cause fatigue cracking to initiate in the area 
    surrounding fastener holes. Furthermore, an isolated repair of an area 
    and/or replacement of any fastener does not remove the unsafe condition 
    for the entire E-42 SATCOM rack and fuselage (supporting) structure. In 
    light of these factors, the FAA has determined that repetitive 
    inspection at intervals not exceeding 3,000 flight hours, is warranted, 
    and that it represents an appropriate means of addressing the unsafe 
    condition while allowing affected airplanes to continue to operate 
    without comprising safety.
        Operators should note that, although the alert service bulletins 
    specify repair instructions for certain conditions and recommend that 
    the manufacturer of the SATCOM rack be contacted for disposition of 
    certain other conditions, this AD will require the repair of those 
    conditions to be accomplished in accordance with a method approved by 
    the FAA.
    
    Explanation of Compliance Time
    
        This AD would require compliance in terms of the number of days 
    after the effective date of this AD, whereas the alert service 
    bulletins (previously described) recommend compliance based on the 
    number of flight hours, as specified below:
         For airplanes identified in the alert service bulletin as 
    Group 1: Within 500 flight hours from receipt of alert service 
    bulletin, or 12,000 flight hours since the E-42 SATCOM rack was 
    installed and populated with equipment.
         For airplanes identified in the alert service bulletin as 
    Group 2: Within 1,000 flight hours from receipt of alert service 
    bulletin, or 20,000 flight hours since the E-42 SATCOM rack was 
    installed and populated with equipment.
        This AD would require that the initial inspection be performed at 
    the applicable time, as specified below:
         For airplanes identified in the alert service bulletin as 
    Group 1: Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
         For airplanes identified in the alert service bulletin as 
    Group 2: Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD.
        The FAA finds that, in view of a recent report indicating that 
    cracking has been detected on an airplane that had accumulated less 
    than 1,500 total flight hours, and because of the safety implications 
    and consequences associated with such cracking, the initial compliance 
    time specified in this AD is appropriate.
    
    Interim Action
    
        This is considered to be interim action. The manufacturer has 
    advised that it currently is developing a modification that will 
    positively address the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. Once this 
    modification is developed, approved, and available, the FAA may 
    consider additional rulemaking.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        None of the Model 747-400 series airplanes affected by this action 
    are on the U.S. Register. All airplanes included in the applicability 
    of this rule currently are operated by non-U.S. operators under foreign 
    registry; therefore, they
    
    [[Page 43055]]
    
    are not directly affected by this AD action. However, the FAA considers 
    that this rule is necessary to ensure that the unsafe condition is 
    addressed in the event that any of these subject airplanes are imported 
    and placed on the U.S. Register in the future.
        Should an affected airplane be imported and placed on the U.S. 
    Register in the future, it would require approximately 3 work hours to 
    accomplish the required inspection, at an average labor rate of $60 per 
    work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of this AD would be 
    $180 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
    
    Determination of Rule's Effective Date
    
        Since this AD action does not affect any airplane that is currently 
    on the U.S. register, it has no adverse economic impact and imposes no 
    additional burden on any person. Therefore, prior notice and public 
    procedures hereon are unnecessary and the amendment may be made 
    effective in less than 30 days after publication in the Federal 
    Register.
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Although this action is in the form of a final rule and was not 
    preceded by notice and opportunity for public comment, comments are 
    invited on this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this 
    rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may 
    desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be 
    submitted in triplicate to the address specified under the caption 
    ADDRESSES. All communications received on or before the closing date 
    for comments will be considered, and this rule may be amended in light 
    of the comments received. Factual information that supports the 
    commenter's ideas and suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating 
    the effectiveness of the AD action and determining whether additional 
    rulemaking action would be needed.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might 
    suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be 
    available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the 
    Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that 
    summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this 
    AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 99-NM-61-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    99-16-10  Boeing: Amendment 39-11245. Docket 99-NM-61-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 747-400 series airplanes as listed in 
    Flight Structures Alert Service Bulletins 92FS082-53-A1, 92FS024-53-
    A1, and 94FS409-53-A2, all dated March 2, 1999, and 94FS448-53-A1, 
    dated February 12, 1999; certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To detect and repair fatigue cracking of the E-42 satellite 
    communications (SATCOM) rack and its supporting structure, which 
    could result in the SATCOM equipment falling from the rack, loss of 
    SATCOM capabilities, injury to passengers, and reduced 
    controllability of the airplane, accomplish the following:
    
    Initial and Repetitive Inspections
    
        (a) Perform a detailed visual inspection of the E-42 SATCOM rack 
    and fuselage (supporting) structure to detect fatigue cracking of 
    the area surrounding the fastener holes, and to detect broken or 
    missing fasteners, at the time specified in paragraph (a)(1) or 
    (a)(2) of this AD, as applicable; in accordance with Flight 
    Structures Alert Service Bulletin 92FS082-53-A1, 92FS024-53-A1, or 
    94FS409-53-A2, all dated March 2, 1999; or 94FS448-53-A1, dated 
    February 12, 1999, as applicable. Thereafter, repeat the inspection 
    at intervals not to exceed 3,000 flight hours.
        (1) For all airplanes identified as Group 1 in the applicable 
    alert service bulletin: Inspect within 30 days after the effective 
    date of this AD.
        (2) For all airplanes identified as Group 2 in the applicable 
    alert service bulletin: Inspect within 90 days after the effective 
    date of this AD.
    
        Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is 
    defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a specific 
    structural area, system, installation or assembly to detect damage, 
    failure or irregularity. Available lighting is normally supplemented 
    with a direct source of good lighting at intensity deemed 
    appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror, 
    magnifying lenses, etc. may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate 
    access procedures may be required.''
    
    Corrective Actions
    
        (b) If any fatigue cracking is found, or if any fastener is 
    broken or missing during any inspection required by paragraph (a) of 
    this AD, prior to further flight, repair in accordance with a method 
    approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office 
    (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Thereafter, repeat the 
    inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD, at intervals not to 
    exceed 3,000 flight hours.
    
    Reporting Requirements
    
        (c) Submit a report of the initial inspection findings (positive 
    and negative) to the
    
    [[Page 43056]]
    
    Manager, Los Angeles ACO, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, 
    California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5322; fax (562) 627-5210; 
    at the applicable time specified in paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of 
    the AD, as applicable. The report must include the initial 
    inspection results, a description of any discrepancy found, the 
    airplane serial number, number of landings, and flight hours on the 
    airplane, and, when possible, sketches and photographs of the 
    inspected area. Information collection requirements contained in 
    this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB) under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
    1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and have been assigned OMB Control 
    Number 2120-0056.
        (1) For airplanes on which the initial inspection is 
    accomplished after the effective date of this AD: Submit the report 
    within 10 days after performing the inspection required by paragraph 
    (a) of this AD.
        (2) For airplanes on which the initial inspection has been 
    accomplished prior to the effective date of this AD: Submit the 
    report within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
    
    Alternative Methods of Compliance
    
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
    
    Special Flight Permits
    
        (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
    21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the 
    requirements of this AD can be accomplished, provided that all the 
    equipment is removed from the E-42 SATCOM rack.
    
    Incorporation by Reference
    
        (f) The inspections shall be done in accordance with Flight 
    Structures Alert Service Bulletin 92FS082-53-A1, dated March 2, 
    1999; Flight Structures Alert Service Bulletin 92FS024-53-A1, dated 
    March 2, 1999; Flight Structures Alert Service Bulletin 94FS409-53-
    A2, dated March 2, 1999; or Flight Structures Alert Service Bulletin 
    94FS448-53-A1, dated February 12, 1999, as applicable. This 
    incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 
    51. Copies may be obtained from Flight Structures Inc., 4407 172nd 
    Street NE, Arlington, Washington 98223. Copies may be inspected at 
    the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington; or at Los Angeles ACO, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, 
    Lakewood, California 90712-4137; or at the Office of the Federal 
    Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (g) This amendment becomes effective on August 24, 1999.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 29, 1999.
    D.L. Riggin,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-20059 Filed 8-6-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/24/1999
Published:
08/09/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; request for comments.
Document Number:
99-20059
Dates:
Effective August 24, 1999.
Pages:
43053-43056 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 99-NM-61-AD, Amendment 39-11245, AD 99-16-10
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-20059.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13