97-24797. Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney JT8D-200 Series Turbofan Engines  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 49135-49137]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-24797]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 96-ANE-35; Amendment 39-10134; AD 97-19-13]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney JT8D-200 Series 
    Turbofan Engines
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive 
    (AD) 94-23-03, applicable to Pratt & Whitney (PW) JT8D-200 series 
    turbofan engines, that currently requires installation and periodic 
    inspection of temperature indicators installed on the No. 4 and 5 
    bearing compartment scavenge oil tube and performance of any necessary 
    corrective action. This amendment requires the installation and 
    periodic inspection of temperature indicators to all PW JT8D-200 series 
    engines, including those incorporating the containment hardware 
    specified in AD 93-23-10. This amendment is prompted by a report of an 
    uncontained turbine failure due to a high pressure turbine (HPT) shaft 
    fracture on an engine that had the containment hardware installed. The 
    actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent fracture of the 
    HPT shaft, which can result in uncontained release of engine fragments, 
    engine fire, inflight engine shutdown, or possible aircraft damage.
    
    DATES: Effective October 24, 1997.
        The incorporation by reference of PW Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) 
    No. 5944, Revision 2, dated June 8, 1992, was previously approved by 
    the Director of the Federal Register as of January 31, 1995 (59 FR 
    61789, December 2, 1994). The incorporation by reference of PW ASB No. 
    5944, Revision 3, dated December 16, 1994, is approved by the Director 
    of the Federal Register as of October 24, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Pratt & Whitney, Publication Department, Supervisor 
    Technical Publications Distribution, M/S 132-30, 400 Main St., East 
    Hartford, CT 06108; telephone (860) 565-7700, fax (860) 565-4503. This 
    information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration 
    (FAA), New England Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 12 
    New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; or at the Office 
    of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Spinney, Aerospace 
    Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller 
    Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; 
    telephone (781) 238-7175, fax (781) 238-7199.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 94-23-03, 
    Amendment 39-9065 (59 FR 61789, December 2, 1994), applicable to Pratt 
    & Whitney (PW) JT8D-200 series turbofan engines, was published in the 
    Federal Register on January 9, 1997 (62 FR 1298). That action proposed 
    to require installation and periodic inspection of temperature 
    indicators to all PW JT8D-200 series engines, including those 
    incorporating the containment hardware modifications required by AD 93-
    23-10.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the comments received.
        One commenter states that the inspection interval should be 
    increased from 65 hours time in service (TIS) to 75 hours TIS, as this 
    increased interval could be incorporated into the service check of that 
    operator's maintenance program. The FAA disagrees. Previous alternative 
    methods of compliance (AMOCs) have been approved to adjust the 
    inspection interval on a case-by-case basis, and the operator is 
    invited to apply for an AMOC using the usual procedure. Generally, 
    however, the compliance interval remains at 65 hours TIS.
        One commenter states that the reporting requirements of the AD 
    should be eliminated, as the original AD terminated reporting 
    requirements six months after the effective date of the AD. The FAA 
    concurs and has eliminated the reporting requirements in the final 
    rule.
        One commenter notes that the containment hardware has been 
    ineffective in ensuring containment and that costs associated with 
    installing the containment hardware have been excessive. The commenter, 
    however, offers no objection to the proposed rule. The indirect costs 
    of operating engines
    
    [[Page 49136]]
    
    with the containment hardware installed are not directly related to 
    this proposed rule, and, therefore, are not addressed in the economic 
    analysis for this rule. A full cost analysis for each AD, including 
    such indirect costs, is not necessary since the FAA has already 
    performed a cost benefit analysis when adopting the airworthiness 
    requirements to which these engines were originally certificated. A 
    finding that an AD is warranted means that the original design no 
    longer achieves the level of safety specified by those airworthiness 
    requirements, and that other required actions are necessary, such as 
    containment hardware, or as in this case, installation and inspection 
    of temperature indicators. Because the original level of safety was 
    already determined to be cost beneficial, these additional requirements 
    needed to return the engine to that level of safety do not add any 
    additional regulatory burden, and, therefore, a full cost analysis 
    would be redundant and unnecessary.
        One commenter supports the AD as proposed on the assumption that 
    the AD requires diagnostic inspections should the required oil 
    temperature indicators show signs that high oil temperatures have 
    occurred within the engine. The AD does require troubleshooting and 
    diagnostic testing and corrective action in accordance with service 
    documents incorporated by reference.
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes described 
    previously. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD.
        There are approximately 2,432 series engines of the affected design 
    in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 1,044 engines installed 
    on aircraft of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will 
    take approximately 1.5 work hours per engine to accomplish the required 
    actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on 
    these figures, the total cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is 
    estimated to be $93,960.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air Transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-9065 (59 FR 
    61789, December 2, 1994) and by adding a new airworthiness directive, 
    Amendment 39-10134, to read as follows:
    
    97-19-13 Pratt & Whitney: Amendment 39-10134. Docket 96-ANE-35. 
    Supersedes AD 94-23-03, Amendment 39-9065.
    
        Applicability: Pratt & Whitney (PW) JT8D-209, -217, -217A, -
    217C, and -219 turbofan engines, installed on but not limited to 
    McDonnell Douglas MD-80 series and Boeing 727 series aircraft.
    
        Note 1: This airworthiness directive (AD) applies to each engine 
    identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of 
    whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area 
    subject to the requirements of this AD. For engines that have been 
    modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the 
    requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request 
    approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with 
    paragraph (d) of this AD. The request should include an assessment 
    of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the 
    unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition 
    has not been eliminated, the request should include specific 
    proposed actions to address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent fracture of the high pressure turbine (HPT) shaft, 
    which can result in uncontained release of engine fragments, engine 
    fire, inflight engine shutdown, or possible aircraft damage, 
    accomplish the following:
        (a) Install and inspect one or two temperature indicators, part 
    number (P/N) 810486, or a single or double set of P/N 809129 and P/N 
    809130 temperature indicators, on the No. 4 and 5 bearing 
    compartment scavenge oil tube, as follows:
        (1) Install temperature indicators on the No. 4 and 5 bearing 
    compartment scavenge oil tube in accordance with Section 2.A.(1) of 
    the Accomplishment Instructions of PW Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) 
    No. 5944, Revision 3, dated December 16, 1994, or Revision 2, dated 
    June 8, 1992, within 90 days after the effective date of this AD.
        (2) Visually inspect temperature indicators within 65 hours TIS 
    of installation. Thereafter, inspect at intervals not to exceed 65 
    hours TIS since last inspection.
        (3) If upon inspection, the color of any temperature indicator 
    window(s) has turned completely black, perform troubleshooting and 
    diagnostic testing and corrective action as required, in accordance 
    with Section 2.A.(2) (c) and (d) or (f) and (g), as applicable, of 
    the Accomplishment Instructions of PW ASB No. 5944, Revision 3, 
    dated December 16, 1994, or Revision 2, dated June 8, 1992. Prior to 
    returning the engine to service, replace any temperature indicator 
    that has turned black and inspect in accordance with paragraphs 
    (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this AD.
        (b) For aircraft installations utilizing one P/N 810486 
    indicator or one set of P/N 809129 and 809130 indicators, and 
    inspection reveals a missing indicator, inspect the remaining 
    temperature indicator, if applicable, to determine if the indicator 
    window has turned completely black. If the indicator window has 
    turned completely black, perform troubleshooting and diagnostic 
    testing, and corrective action as required, in accordance with 
    paragraph (a)(3) of this AD. If the indicator window has not turned 
    completely black or if there are no additional indicators installed, 
    then install a new indicator in accordance with Section 2.A.(1) of 
    the Accomplishment Instruction of PW ASB No. 5944, Revision No. 3, 
    dated December 16, 1994, or Revision 2, dated June 8, 1992, prior to 
    return to service, and visually inspect the temperature indicator 
    within 65 hours TIS since installation. Thereafter, inspect at 
    intervals not to exceed 65 hours TIS since last inspection in 
    accordance with paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this AD.
        (c) For aircraft installations utilizing two P/N 810486 
    indicators or two sets of P/N 809129 and 809130 indicators, and 
    inspection reveals a missing indicator(s), inspect the remaining 
    temperature indicator(s), if applicable, to determine if the 
    indicator window has turned completely black. If the indicator 
    window has turned completely black, perform troubleshooting and 
    diagnostic testing, and corrective action
    
    [[Page 49137]]
    
    as required, in accordance with paragraph (a)(3) of this AD. If the 
    indicator window has not turned completely black, install a new 
    indicator(s) in accordance with Section 2.A.(1) of the 
    Accomplishment Instructions of PW ASB No. 5944, Revision 3, dated 
    December 16, 1994, or Revision 2, dated June 8, 1992, prior to 
    return to service, and visually inspect the temperature indicator 
    within 65 hours TIS since installation. Thereafter, inspect at 
    intervals not to exceed 65 hours TIS since last inspection in 
    accordance with paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this AD.
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Engine Certification Office. 
    Operators shall forward their requests through an appropriate FAA 
    Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send 
    it to the Manager, Engine Certification Office.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative method of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Engine Certification Office.
    
        (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (f) The actions required by this AD shall be done in accordance 
    with the following PW ASBs:
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Document No.                   Pages       Revision                       Date                    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    5944....................................         1-35            3  December 16, 1994.                          
    Total pages: 35.                                                                                                
    5944....................................         1-44            2  June 8, 1992.                               
    Total pages: 44.                                                                                                
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        This incorporation by reference of PW ASB No. 5944, Revision 2, 
    dated June 9, 1993, was previously approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 
    51 as of January 31, 1995 (59 FR 61789, December 2, 1994). Copies 
    may be obtained from Pratt & Whitney, Publication Department, 
    Supervisor Technical Publications Distribution, M/S 132-30, 400 Main 
    St., East Hartford, CT 06108; telephone (860) 565-7700, fax (860) 
    565-4503. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, New England Region, 
    Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 12 New England Executive 
    Park, Burlington, MA; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 
    North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (g) This amendment becomes effective on October 24, 1997.
    
        Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on September 10, 1997.
    Mark C. Fulmer,
    Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
    Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 97-24797 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
10/24/1997
Published:
09/19/1997
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-24797
Dates:
Effective October 24, 1997.
Pages:
49135-49137 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96-ANE-35, Amendment 39-10134, AD 97-19-13
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
97-24797.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13