98-25119. Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, -301, -311, and -315 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 183 (Tuesday, September 22, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 50501-50503]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-25119]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-NM-172-AD; Amendment 39-10781; AD 98-20-14]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, 
    -201, -202, -301, -311, and -315 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -
    202, -301, -311, and -315 series airplanes, that requires a one-time 
    inspection to detect chafing of electrical wires in the cable trough 
    below the cabin floor; repair, if necessary; installation of additional 
    tie-mounts and tie-wraps; and application of sealant to rivet heads. 
    This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing 
    airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. 
    The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent chafing of 
    electrical wires, which could result in an uncommanded shutdown of an 
    engine during flight.
    
    DATES: Effective October 27, 1998.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of October 27, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division, 
    Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada. This information 
    may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington; or at the FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, New York 
    Aircraft Certification Office, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor, Valley 
    Stream, New York; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North 
    Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Cuneo, Senior Aerospace 
    Engineer, Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, Engine and 
    Propeller Directorate, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 10 Fifth 
    Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York
    
    [[Page 50502]]
    
    11581; telephone (516) 256-7506; fax (516) 568-2716.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-
    102, -103, -106, -201, -202, -301, -311, and -315 series airplanes was 
    published in the Federal Register on July 31, 1998 (63 FR 40852). That 
    action proposed to require a one-time inspection to detect chafing of 
    electrical wires in the cable trough below the cabin floor; repair, if 
    necessary; installation of additional tie-mounts and tie-wraps; and 
    application of sealant to rivet heads.
    
    Comments
    
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response 
    to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
    
    Explanation of Change Made to This Final Rule
    
        The FAA has revised the final rule to reflect a change of the 
    manufacturer's name from de Havilland to Bombardier.
    
    Conclusion
    
        The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest 
    require the adoption of the rule with the change previously described. 
    The FAA has determined that this change will neither increase the 
    economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of this AD.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 225 airplanes of U.S. registry will be 
    affected by this AD.
        For the 210 Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, and -202 series 
    airplanes affected, it will take approximately 70 work hours per 
    airplane to accomplish the required actions, at an average labor rate 
    of $60 per work hour. Required parts will be provided by the 
    manufacturer at no cost to the operators. Based on these figures, the 
    cost impact of the required AD for these airplanes on U.S. operators is 
    estimated to be $882,000, or $4,200 per airplane.
        For the 15 Model DHC-8-301, -311, and -315 series airplanes 
    affected, it will take approximately 100 work hours per airplane to 
    accomplish the required actions, at an average labor rate of $60 per 
    work hour. Required parts will be provided by the manufacturer at no 
    cost to the operators. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the 
    required AD for these airplanes on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
    $90,000, or $6,000 per airplane.
        The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions 
    that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this 
    AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
    future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    98-20-14  Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly de Havilland, Inc.): Amendment 
    39-10781. Docket 98-NM-172-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, -301, -
    311, and -315 series airplanes; serial numbers 3 through 519 
    inclusive, excluding serial number 462; certificated in any 
    category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent chafing of electrical wires, which could result in an 
    uncommanded shutdown of an engine during flight, accomplish the 
    following:
        (a) Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD, 
    perform a one-time visual inspection to detect chafing of electrical 
    wires in the cable trough below the cabin floor; install additional 
    tie-mounts and tie-wraps; and apply sealant to rivet heads 
    (reference Bombardier Modification 8/2705); in accordance with 
    Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 8-53-66, dated March 27, 1998. If 
    any chafing is detected during the inspection required by this 
    paragraph, prior to further flight, repair in accordance with the 
    service bulletin.
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, New York ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the New York ACO.
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (d) The actions shall be done in accordance with Bombardier 
    Service Bulletin S.B. 8-53-66, dated March 27, 1998. This 
    incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 
    51. Copies may be obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier 
    Regional Aircraft Division, Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario 
    M3K 1Y5, Canada. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or 
    at the FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, New York Aircraft 
    Certification Office, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, 
    New York; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North 
    Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    
    [[Page 50503]]
    
    
        Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in Canadian 
    airworthiness directive CF-98-08, dated March 26, 1998.
    
        (e) This amendment becomes effective on October 27, 1998.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 14, 1998.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-25119 Filed 9-21-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
10/27/1998
Published:
09/22/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-25119
Dates:
Effective October 27, 1998.
Pages:
50501-50503 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-NM-172-AD, Amendment 39-10781, AD 98-20-14
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-25119.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13