96-24707. RailTex, Inc.Continuance in Control ExemptionConnecticut Southern Railroad, Inc.  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 189 (Friday, September 27, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 50904]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-24707]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------1
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    [STB Finance Docket No. 32121]
    
    
    RailTex, Inc.--Continuance in Control Exemption--Connecticut 
    Southern Railroad, Inc.
    
        RailTex, Inc. (RailTex), a noncarrier holding company, has filed a 
    notice of exemption to continue in control of the Connecticut Southern 
    Railroad, Inc. (CSO), upon CSO's becoming a Class III railroad.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\  The ICC Termination Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-88, 109 
    Stat. 803, which was enacted on December 29, 1995, and took effect 
    on January 1, 1996, abolished the Interstate Commerce Commission and 
    transferred certain functions to the Surface Transportation Board 
    (Board).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        This notice relates to functions that are subject to Board 
    jurisdiction pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 11323-24.
        The transaction is expected to be consummated on September 20, 
    1996.
        This transaction is related to STB Finance Docket No. 33120, 
    Connecticut Southern Railroad, Inc.--Acquisition and Operation 
    Exemption---Lines of Consolidated Rail Corporation, wherein CSO seeks 
    to acquire and operate certain rail lines from Consolidated Rail 
    Corporation.
        RailTex controls 20 existing Class III railroad subsidiaries: San 
    Diego & Imperial Valley Railroad Company, Inc., operating in 
    California; North Carolina & Virginia Railroad Company, Inc. (including 
    Virginia Southern Division), operating in North Carolina and Virginia; 
    South Carolina Central Railroad Company, Inc. (including Carolina 
    Piedmont Division), operating in South Carolina; Mid-Michigan Railroad, 
    Inc. (including Northeast Kansas & Missouri Division and Texas 
    Northeastern Division) operating in Texas, Kansas, Missouri and 
    Michigan; Chesapeake & Albemarle Railroad Company, Inc., operating in 
    Virginia and North Carolina; Michigan Shore Railroad Company, Inc., 
    operating in Michigan; New Orleans Lower Coast Railroad Company, Inc., 
    operating in Louisiana; Dallas, Garland & Northeastern Railroad, Inc., 
    operating in Texas; Indiana Southern Railroad, Inc., operating in 
    Indiana; Missouri & Northern Arkansas Railroad Company, Inc., operating 
    in Kansas, Missouri and Arkansas; Salt Lake City Southern Railroad 
    Company, Inc., operating in Utah; Grand Rapids Eastern Railroad, Inc., 
    operating in Michigan; Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad, Inc., 
    operating in Oregon and California; New England Central Railroad, Inc., 
    operating in Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Connecticut; 
    Georgia Southwestern Railroad, Inc. (including Georgia & Alabama 
    Division and Georgia Southwestern Division), operating in Alabama and 
    Georgia; Austin & Northwestern Railroad Company, Inc. (including Texas-
    New Mexico Division), operating in Texas and New Mexico; Cincinnati 
    Terminal Railway Company, operating in Ohio; Indiana and Ohio Railroad, 
    Inc., operating in Indiana and Ohio; Indiana & Ohio Railway Company, 
    operating in Ohio; and Indiana & Ohio Central Railroad, Inc., operating 
    in Ohio.
        RailTex states that: (i) The rail lines to be operated by CSO do 
    not connect with any railroad in the RailTex corporate family; (ii) the 
    transaction is not part of a series of anticipated transactions that 
    would connect CSO with any railroad in the RailTex corporate family; 
    and (iii) the transaction does not involve a Class I carrier. 
    Therefore, the transaction is exempt from the prior approval 
    requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323. See 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2).
        Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board may not use its exemption 
    authority to relieve a rail carrier of its statutory obligation to 
    protect the interests of its employees. Section 11326(c), however, does 
    not provide for labor protection for transactions under sections 11324 
    and 11325 that involve only Class III rail carriers. Because this 
    transaction involves Class III rail carriers only, the Board, under the 
    statute, may not impose labor protective conditions for this 
    transaction.
        If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
    exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
    U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
    revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
        An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
    Finance Docket No. 33121, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
    Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, 1201 Constitution 
    Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423. In addition, a copy of each 
    pleading must be served on Karl Morell, Esq., Ball, Janik LLP, 1455 F 
    Street, N.W., Suite 225, Washington, DC 20005.
    
        Decided: September 18, 1996.
    
        By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
    Proceedings.
    Vernon A. Williams,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-24707 Filed 9-26-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/27/1996
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-24707
Pages:
50904-50904 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
STB Finance Docket No. 32121
PDF File:
96-24707.pdf