96-22687. Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Britten-Norman Ltd. (formerly Britten-Norman) BN-2A and BN2A MK. 111 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 174 (Friday, September 6, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 47049-47051]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-22687]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 96-CE-16-AD; Amendment 39-9748; AD 96-18-21]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Britten-Norman Ltd. (formerly 
    Britten-Norman) BN-2A and BN2A MK. 111 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes Airworthiness Directive (AD) 75-26-
    15, which currently requires repetitively inspecting the aileron mass 
    balance clamp unit attachment for looseness on Pilatus Britten-Norman 
    Ltd. (Pilatus Britten-Norman) BN-2A and BN2A MK. 111 series airplanes, 
    and modifying the aileron and mass balance clamp unit if any looseness 
    is found. The Federal Aviation Administration's policy on aging 
    commuter-class aircraft is to eliminate or, in certain instances, 
    reduce the number of certain repetitive short-interval inspections when 
    improved parts or modifications are available. This action retains the 
    repetitive inspections required by AD 75-26-15, and requires modifying 
    the aileron and mass balance unit (at a certain time) as terminating 
    action for the repetitive inspection requirement. The actions specified 
    in this AD are intended to prevent failure of the aileron mass balance 
    attachment, which could result in loss of control of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective October 25, 1996.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of October 25, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Service information that applies to this AD may be obtained 
    from Pilatus Britten-Norman Limited, Bembridge, Isle of Wight, United 
    Kingdom PO35 5PR; telephone 44-1983 872511; facsimile 44-1983 873246. 
    This information may also be examined at the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket 96-CE-16-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th 
    Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or at the Office of the Federal 
    Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Tom Rodriguez, Program Officer, 
    Brussels Aircraft Certification Division, FAA, Europe, Africa, and 
    Middle East Office, c/o American Embassy, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium; 
    telephone (32 2) 508.2717; facsimile (32 2) 230.6899; or Mr. Jeffrey 
    Morfitt, Project Officer, Small Airplane Directorate, Airplane 
    Certification Service, FAA, 1201 Walnut, suite 900, Kansas City, 
    Missouri 64106; telephone (816) 426-6932; facsimile (816) 426-2169.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Events Leading to This Action
    
        A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to Pilatus Britten-
    Norman BN-2A and BN2A MK. 111 series airplanes was published in the 
    Federal Register on May 9, 1996 (61 FR 21146). The action proposed to 
    supersede AD 75-26-15 with a new AD that would (1) retain the 
    requirements of repetitively inspecting the aileron mass balance clamp 
    unit
    
    [[Page 47050]]
    
    attachment for looseness and modifying any aileron and mass balance 
    unit immediately where looseness is found; and (2) require modifying 
    the aileron and mass balance unit (at a certain time) if not previously 
    required. The modification would terminate the need for the repetitive 
    inspections of the aileron and mass balance unit attachment. 
    Accomplishment of the proposed actions would continue to be in 
    accordance with Britten-Norman Service Bulletin No. BN-2/SB.67, Issue 
    1, dated October 24, 1973.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. No comments were received on the 
    proposed rule or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
    
    The FAA's Determination
    
        After careful review of all available information related to the 
    subject presented above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the 
    public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed except for 
    minor editorial corrections. The FAA has determined that these minor 
    corrections will not change the meaning of the AD and will not add any 
    additional burden upon the public than was already proposed.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 109 airplanes in the U.S. registry will be 
    affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 10 workhours 
    (inspection: 1 workhour; modification: 9 workhours) per airplane to 
    accomplish the action, and that the average labor rate is approximately 
    $60 an hour. Parts cost approximately $160 per airplane. Based on these 
    figures, the total cost impact of this AD on U.S. operators is 
    estimated to be $82,840. This figure only takes into account the cost 
    of the initial inspection and inspection-terminating modification and 
    does not take into account the cost of repetitive inspections. The FAA 
    has no way of determining the number of repetitive inspections each of 
    the owners/operators will incur over the life of the affected 
    airplanes.
        This figure is also based on the assumption that no affected 
    airplane owner/operator has accomplished the required modification. 
    This action eliminates the repetitive inspections required by AD 75-26-
    15. The FAA has no way of determining the operational levels of each 
    individual operator of the affected airplanes, and subsequently cannot 
    determine the repetitive inspection costs that would be eliminated by 
    this action. The FAA estimates these costs to be substantial over the 
    long term.
        Pilatus Britten-Norman does not know the number of parts 
    distributed to the affected airplane owners/operators. Numerous sets of 
    parts were sent out to the owners/operators of the affected airplanes, 
    but over the years Pilatus Britten-Norman has not retained these 
    records. The company believes that most of the affected airplanes 
    already have the required inspection-terminating modification 
    incorporated.
    
    The FAA's Aging Commuter Class Aircraft Policy
    
        This AD is part of the FAA's aging commuter airplane policy, which 
    briefly states that, when a modification exists that could eliminate or 
    reduce the number of required critical inspections, the modification 
    should be incorporated.
        The intent of the FAA's aging commuter airplane program is to 
    ensure safe operation of airplanes that are in commercial service 
    without adversely impacting private operators. Of the approximately 109 
    airplanes in the U.S. registry that would be affected by this AD, the 
    FAA has determined that approximately 25 percent are operated in 
    scheduled passenger service by 11 different operators. A significant 
    number of the remaining 75 percent are operated in other forms of air 
    transportation such as air cargo and air taxi.
        This action allows 1,000 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the 
    effective date of the AD before mandatory accomplishment of the design 
    modification. The average utilization of the fleet for those airplanes 
    in commercial commuter service is approximately 25 to 50 hours TIS per 
    week. Based on these figures, operators of airplanes involved in 
    commercial operation will have to accomplish the modification within 5 
    to 10 months after this AD becomes effective. For private owners, who 
    typically operate between 100 to 200 hours TIS per year, this allows 5 
    to 10 years before the required modification becomes mandatory. The 
    time it would take those in air cargo/air taxi operations before this 
    action becomes mandatory is unknown because of the wide variation 
    between each airplane used in this service. The exact numbers would 
    fall somewhere between the average for commuter operators and private 
    operators.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A copy of the final evaluation prepared for this 
    action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the 
    caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing Airworthiness Directive 
    (AD) 75-26-15, Amendment 39-2464, and by adding a new AD to read as 
    follows:
    
    96-18-21  Pilatus Britten-Norman: Amendment 39-9748; Docket No. 96-
    CE-16-AD. Supersedes AD 75-26-15, Amendment 39- 2464. Applicability: 
    Models BN-2, BN-2A, BN-2A-6, BN-2A-8, BN-2A-2, BN-2A-9, BN-2A-3, BN-
    2A-20, BN-2A-21, BN-2A-26, BN-2A-27, BN2A MK. 111, BN2A MK. 111-2, 
    and BN2A MK. 111-3 airplanes (all serial numbers), certificated in 
    any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
    
    [[Page 47051]]
    
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (f) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated in the body of this AD, unless 
    already accomplished.
        To prevent failure of the aileron mass balance attachment, which 
    could result in loss of control of the airplane, accomplish the 
    following:
        (a) Prior to the first flight of each day after the effective 
    date of this AD (see NOTE 2 of this AD), inspect the attachment of 
    the aileron mass balance clamp unit for looseness in accordance with 
    the ``Inspection'' section of Britten-Norman Service Bulletin (SB) 
    No. BN-2/SB.67, Issue 1, dated October 24, 1973.
    
        Note 2: The ``prior to first flight of each day after the 
    effective date of this AD'' compliance time required by paragraph 
    (a) of this AD is exactly the same as required by AD 75-26-15 
    (superseded by this AD).
    
        (b) If a loose attachment of the aileron mass balance clamp unit 
    is found during any of the inspections required by this AD, prior to 
    further flight, modify the aileron and mass balance clamp unit in 
    accordance with the ``b. Sequence of Operations'' section of 
    Britten-Norman SB No. BN-2/SB.67, Issue 1, dated October 24, 1973.
        (c) Within the next 1,000 hours time-in-service after the 
    effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished as specified 
    and required by paragraph (b) of this AD, modify the aileron and 
    mass balance clamp unit in accordance with the ``b. Sequence of 
    Operations'' section of Britten-Norman SB No. BN-2/SB.67, Issue 1, 
    dated October 24, 1973.
        (d) Accomplishing the modification required by paragraph (b) or 
    (c) of this AD is considered terminating action for the repetitive 
    inspection requirement of this AD.
        (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (f) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    initial or repetitive compliance times that provides an equivalent 
    level of safety may be approved by the Manager, Brussels Aircraft 
    Certification Division, Europe, Africa, Middle East office, FAA, c/o 
    American Embassy, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. The request should be 
    forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may 
    add comments and then send it to the Manager, Brussels Aircraft 
    Certification Division. Alternative methods of compliance approved 
    in accordance with AD 75-26-15 (superseded by this action) are not 
    considered approved as alternative methods of compliance with this 
    AD.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Brussels Aircraft Certification Division.
    
        (g) The inspections and modification required by this AD shall 
    be done in accordance with Britten-Norman Service Bulletin No. BN-2/
    SB.67, Issue 1, dated October 24, 1973. This incorporation by 
    reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in 
    accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be 
    obtained from Pilatus Britten-Norman Limited, Bembridge, Isle of 
    Wight, United Kingdom PO35 5PR. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, 
    Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Room 1558, 
    601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri, or at the Office of the 
    Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
        (h) This amendment (39-9748) supersedes AD 75-26-15, Amendment 
    39-2464.
        (i) This amendment (39-9748) becomes effective on October 25, 
    1996.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 29,1996.
    Henry A. Armstrong,
    Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 96-22687 Filed 9-5-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
10/25/1996
Published:
09/06/1996
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-22687
Dates:
Effective October 25, 1996.
Pages:
47049-47051 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96-CE-16-AD, Amendment 39-9748, AD 96-18-21
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
96-22687.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13