96-22824. Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 174 (Friday, September 6, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 47125-47126]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-22824]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    [ER-FRL-5472-9]
    
    
    Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
    EPA Comments
    
        Availability of EPA comments prepared August 19, 1996 through 
    August 23, 1996 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), 
    under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the 
    National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of 
    EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at 
    (202) 564-7167.
        An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
    impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 05, 1996 (61 
    FR 15251).
    
    Drafts EISs
    
        ERP No. D-AFS-G61036-NM Rating LO, EL Cajete Pumice Mine Project, 
    Implementation, Plan of Operation and COE Section 404 Permit, Jemez 
    National Recreation Area, Santa Fe National Forest, Jemez Ranger 
    District, Sandoval County, NM.
        Summary: EPA expressed lack of objections to the selection of the 
    Forest Service's preferred Alternative 1(a) as described in the draft 
    EIS.
        ERP No. D-AFS-J65250-CO Rating EC1, Routt National Forest Land and 
    Resource Management Plan, Implementation, Grand, Routt, Rio Blanco, 
    Jackson, Moffat and Garfield Counties, CO.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about water quality, 
    fisheries and wildlife habitat and noxious weed control. EPA suggests 
    that the FEIS add details or general plans to improve or maintain 
    environmental conditions and include revised requirements for grazing 
    allotment analysis.
        ERP No. D-AFS-J65253-MT Rating EC2, Boulder and Wyman Gulch 
    Vegetation Management Timber Sale and Prescribed Burning, 
    Implementation, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forests, Philipsburg 
    Ranger District, Granite County, MT.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding exiting 
    degraded water quality and fisheries in the project area and choice of 
    treatment method/units in alternatives. EPA recommends additional 
    information be included in the final EIS to fully assess and mitigate 
    for potential adverse impacts to fisheries cumulative watershed impact, 
    timber supply and wildlife habitat.
        ERP No. D-AFS-J65254-MT Rating EC2, Sheep Range and China Basin 
    Salvage Project, Implementation, Kootenai National Forest, Libby Ranger 
    District, Lincoln County, MT.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about inadequate 
    disclosure of environmental impacts and cumulative impacts to the 
    threatened grizzly bear. EPA suggests that the final EIS include 
    information to fully assess and mitigate all potential environmental 
    impacts of the management actions.
        ERP No. DS-AFS-J65153-MT Rating LO, Trail Creek Timber Sale, 
    Implementation, New and Updated Information, Beaverhead National 
    Forest, Wisdom Ranger District, Beaverhead County, MT.
        Summary: EPA expressed lack of objections to the proposed action.
    
    Final EISs
    
        ERP No. F-AFS-E65047-MS, G. F. Erambert and Black Creek Seed 
    Orchards Pest Management Plan, Implementation, Southern Region, 
    National Forests in Mississippi, Forrest and Perry Counties, MS.
        Summary: EPA expressed no objections; our comments in the draft EIS 
    were adequately addressed in the final EIS.
        ERP No. F-BLM-J02009-00, Express Crude Oil Pipeline Project, 
    Construction, Operation and Maintenance, Issuance of Right-of-Way 
    Grant, Hill, Chouteau, Fergus, Judith Basin, Wheatland, Golden Valley, 
    Stillwater and Carbon Counties, MT and Bighorn, Washakies, Hot Springs, 
    Freemont and Watrona Counties, WY.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding the 
    proposed pipeline crossings of rivers, streams and wetlands, and 
    requests that directional drilling be used for the pipeline crossing of 
    the Yellowstone River, as well as be considered for other major river 
    crossings with significant fisheries, wide channels, and late season 
    flows. EPA recommended that a wetland mitigation plan be prepared and 
    will continue to work closely with the Corps of Engineers on 404 
    permitting issues related to this project.
        ERP No. F-BLM-J65229-MT, Sweet Grass Hills Resource Management Plan 
    Amendment, Implementation, West HiLine Resource Management Plan, Toole 
    and Liberty Counties, MT.
        Summary: EPA continues to express environmental concerns regarding 
    potential adverse impacts to cultural and water resource associated 
    with reasonably foreseeable mining actions.
        ERP No. F-BLM-J67019-MT, Zortman and Landusky Mines Reclamation 
    Plan Modifications and Mine Life Extensions, Approval of Mine 
    Operation, Mine Reclamation and COE Section 404 Permits, Little Rocky 
    Mountains, Phillip County, MT.
        Summary: EPA continues to express environmental objections 
    regarding water quality and environmental justice. The FEIS responded 
    to a number of the DEIS water quality objections in the expanded Water 
    Quality Improvement Plan. Many of the remaining water quality 
    objections would be addressed if the proposed operating permit 
    incorporates requirements necessary to comply with the Clean Water Act. 
    The proposed action potentially poses a significantly high adverse 
    impact to cultural resources and religious practices of the tribal 
    community. EPA recommends considering alternative dispute resolution to 
    investigate additional opportunities for mitigating impacts to the 
    Tribes.
        ERP No. FS-BLM-J65203-MT, Big Dry Land and Resource Management 
    Plan, Updated Information on Leaving the Calypso Trail Open or Closing 
    the Trail to Motorized Vehicles, Implementation, Miles City District, 
    MT.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about potential 
    adverse impacts, i.e. erosion, to the trail from unlimited motorized 
    access. EPA suggests analyzing additional options and alternatives that 
    may better balance the multiple uses expected by the public. EPA 
    suggests that the standards and criteria used by BLM to evaluate
    
    [[Page 47126]]
    
    and quantify trail erosion and impacts to Wilderness Study Areas be 
    clearly outlined and be made publically available.
    
        Dated: September 3, 1996.
    William D. Dickerson,
    Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
    [FR Doc. 96-22824 Filed 9-5-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/06/1996
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-22824
Pages:
47125-47126 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
ER-FRL-5472-9
PDF File:
96-22824.pdf