03-18255. Combating HIV/AIDS in Ugandan Workplaces Through Community/Faith-Based Organizations

AGENCY:

Bureau of International Labor Affairs, Department of Labor.

ACTION:

Notice of availability of funds and solicitation for cooperative agreement application (SGA 03-11).

SUMMARY:

This notice contains all of the necessary information and forms needed to apply for grant funding. The U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL), Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB), announces the availability of funds to be granted by cooperative agreement (hereafter referred to as “grant”) to one or more qualifying organizations. USDOL will award up to U.S. $1 million through one or more grants to an organization or to an eligible “intermediary” organization or organizations to develop and implement a project to stem the spread of HIV/AIDS infection in Uganda, focusing on workers in the workplace and surrounding communities. Eligible “intermediaries” are defined as those non-profit, community, and/or faith-based organizations with established working relationships to grassroots faith-based and community organizations in Uganda working in the field of HIV/AIDS. The intermediary is expected to sub-contract a substantial portion of its award to eligible local grassroots organizations in Uganda, in support of mitigating HIV/AIDS through prevention education. It is expected that the intermediary organization will serve as a mentor of the sub-contracted local organizations to strengthen their capacity to address HIV/AIDS among workers in Uganda. Through their collaboration, the intermediaries will achieve the following objectives: (a) Increase knowledge of HIV/AIDS prevention methods among Ugandan men and women as a first step to changing sexual behavior; (b) strengthen capacity among local organizations to identify HIV/AIDS issues, develop effective strategies to mitigate the impact of HIV/AIDS, and provide education and supportive services to implement such strategies; and (c) improve the capacity of sub-contracted local community and faith-based organizations to sustain their activities through the provision of training in the areas of business development, administration, and finance.

DATES:

The closing date for receipt of applications is Friday, August 22, 2003. Applications must be received by 4:45 p.m. (Eastern Time) at the address below.

ADDRESSES:

Application forms will not be mailed. They are published as part of this Federal Register notice and in the Federal Register, which may be obtained from your nearest U.S. Government office or public library or online at http://www.archives.gov/​federal_​register/​index.html. Applications must be delivered to: U.S. Department of Labor, Procurement Services Center, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N-5416, Attention: Lisa Harvey, Reference: SGA 03-11, Washington, DC 20210.

Applications sent by e-mail, telegram, or facsimile (FAX) will not be accepted. Applications sent by other delivery services, such as Federal Express, UPS, etc., will be accepted; the applicant, however, bears the responsibility for timely submission. Applications that do not meet the conditions set forth in this notice will not be honored. No exceptions to the mailing and delivery requirements set forth in this notice will be granted.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lisa Harvey, e-mail address: [e-mail], tel: [phone] (this is not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

USDOL/ILAB carries out a worldwide International Cooperation Program that helps ensure that the greatest possible number of workers benefit from a more open world economy. The three major initiatives of the International Cooperation Program are:

Improving Economic Opportunity and Income Security for Workers (EOIS)—Under the EOIS initiative, USDOL works to strengthen developing countries” abilities to build and institutionalize social safety net policies and programs needed to improve working conditions and foster economic growth. Projects under this initiative aim to increase employment among targeted groups, improve workplace safety and health, and increase access to social insurance.

Protecting the Basic Rights of Workers (PBRW)—Under the PBRW initiative, USDOL works to implement the fundamental principles embodied in the International Labor Organization's (ILO) Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, specifically working towards strengthening the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining, eliminating forced or compulsory labor, and eliminating employment discrimination.

International HIV/AIDS Workplace-based Education Program (IHWEP)—Under the IHWEP initiative, USDOL works to reduce the rate of HIV/AIDS infection through workplace-based prevention and education programs and to improve the workplace environment for workers living with HIV/AIDS. The IHWEP program also works to build the capacity of the tripartite partners to address the long-term impact of HIV/AIDS on labor markets and economic development.

USDOL/ILAB manages its projects in partnership with stakeholders representing the government, employers, workers, and other organizations.

I. Authority

ILAB is authorized to award and administer this program by the Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, 2003, Pub. L. 108-7, 117 Stat. 11 (2003).

Legal rules that apply to faith-based organizations that receive government funds: The government is prohibited from directly funding religious activity*. These grants may not be used for religious instruction, worship, prayer, proselytizing or other inherently religious practices. Neutral, non-religious criteria that neither favor nor disfavor religion must be employed in the selection of grant recipients.

*The term “direct” funding is used to describe Federal funds that are provided directly by a governmental entity or an intermediate organization, as opposed to funds that an organization receives as the result of the genuine and independent private choice of a beneficiary. In other contexts, the term “direct” funding may be used to refer to those funds that an organization receives directly from the Federal government (also known as “discretionary” funding), as opposed to funding that it receives from a State or local government (also known as “indirect” or “block grant” funding). In this SGA, the term “direct” has the former meaning.

II. Application Process

A. Eligible Applicants

For the purposes of this announcement, “intermediaries” are defined as those non-profit, community, and/or faith-based organizations with existing connections to Ugandan-based, grassroots, faith-based, and/or community organizations working in the field of HIV/AIDS prevention and mitigation. These intermediary organizations must possess strong financial and grant management skills and the ability to mentor and strengthen the capacity of Ugandan non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to effectively respond to HIV/AIDS in Uganda. The intermediary is expected to issue sub-contracts to non-profit grassroots organizations which:

• Have social services as a major part of their mission;
• Have a total annual operating budget of $150,000 or less; and
• Possess or have the capacity to adopt sufficient administrative and financial controls to ensure proper management of the sub-contracted funds.

The U.S. Department of Labor will determine whether Ugandan NGOs have met the criteria and are eligible to be sub-contracted under this grant.

The Ministry of Labor will serve as the primary government contact for the project in Uganda. However, the Grantee may also elect to work with other government agencies that are addressing HIV/AIDS. Partnerships of more than one organization are also eligible to apply for these funds, although in such a case a lead organization must be identified. The capabilities of applicants, partners, and co-applicants to perform necessary aspects of this solicitation will be determined according to the criteria identified in Section XI. All applicants are requested to complete the Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants (OMB No. 1225-0083) (see Appendix A).

Please note that to be eligible, grant applicants classified under the Internal Revenue Code as a 501(c)(4) entity (see 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(4)), may not engage in lobbying activities. According to the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, as amended by 2 U.S.C. 1611, an organization, as described in section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, that engages in lobbying activities shall not be eligible for the receipt of federal funds constituting an award, grant, or loan.

B. Submission of Applications

One (1) blue ink-signed original, complete application in English plus two (2) copies of the application must be submitted to the U.S. Department of Labor, Procurement Services Center, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Room N-5416, Washington, DC 20210, no later than 4:45 p.m. Eastern Time on the established due date. To aid with review of applications, Applicants may submit three (3) additional paper copies of the application (five total). Applicants who do not provide additional copies will not be penalized.

The application must consist of two (2) separate parts. Part I of the application must contain the Standard Form (SF) 424, “Application for Federal Assistance” and sections A-F of the Budget Information Form SF 424A (see Appendix A). These forms are also available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/​omb/​grants. Part II must contain a technical proposal that demonstrates capabilities in accordance with the statement of work (Section III) and the selection criteria (Section XI). The application should include the name, address, telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail address (if applicable) of a key contact person at the applicant's organization in case questions should arise.

To be considered responsive to this solicitation the application must consist of the above-mentioned separate sections not to exceed 25 single-sided (81/2″ × 11″ or A4), double-spaced, 12-point font, typed pages for which a response is submitted. Major sections and sub-sections of the application should be divided and clearly identified (e.g., with tab dividers), and all pages shall be numbered. Applicants are required to propose that a project address ALL of the project objectives identified in the Statement of Work in Section III. Any applications that do not conform to these standards may be deemed non-responsive to this solicitation and may not be evaluated. The application must include a table of contents and an abstract summarizing the application in not more than two (2) pages. Standard forms, attachments, resumes, exhibits, letters of support, and the abstract are not counted towards the page limit. If an applicant exceeds the stated page limit, the review panel has the discretion to deduct 10 points, in accordance with the rating process specified in the “Rating Criteria and Selection” section of this SGA.

The individual signing the SF 424 on behalf of the applicant must be authorized to bind the applicant.

C. Acceptable Methods of Submission

The grant application package must be received at the designated place by the date and time specified, or it will not be considered. Applications sent by e-mail, telegram, or facsimile (FAX) will not be accepted. Applications sent by other delivery services, such as Federal Express, UPS, etc., will be accepted; the applicant, however, bears the responsibility for timely submission. Applications that do not meet the conditions set forth in this notice will not be honored. No exceptions to the mailing, delivery, and hand-delivery conditions set forth in this notice will be granted.

Any application received at the Office of Procurement Services after 4:45 pm Eastern Time on Friday, August 22, 2003 will not be considered unless it is received before the award is made and:

• It was sent by registered or certified mail no later than the fifth calendar day before the closing date; or
• It was sent by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail/Next Day Service from the post office to the addressee no later than 5:00 pm at the place of mailing two (2) working days (excluding weekends and Federal holidays), prior to the closing date; or
• It is determined by the Government that the late receipt was due solely to mishandling by the Government after receipt at the U.S. Department of Labor at the address indicated.

The only acceptable evidence to establish the date of mailing of a late application sent by registered or certified mail is the U.S. Postal Service postmark on the envelope or wrapper and on the original receipt from the U.S. Postal Service. If the postmark is not legible, an application received after the above closing time and date shall be processed as if mailed late. “Postmark” means a printed, stamped, or otherwise placed impression (not a postage meter machine impression) that is readily identifiable without further action as having been applied and affixed by an employee of the U.S. Postal Service on the date of mailing. Therefore, applicants should request that the postal clerk place a legible hand cancellation “bull's-eye” postmark on both the receipt and the envelope or wrapper.

The only acceptable evidence to establish the date of mailing of a late application sent by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail/Next Day Service from the post office to the addressee is the date entered by the Post Office receiving clerk on the “Express Mail/ Next Day Service—Post Office to Addressee” label and the postmark on the envelope or wrapper on the original receipt from the U.S. Postal Service. “Postmark” has the same meaning as defined above. Therefore, applicants should request that the postal clerk place a legible hand cancellation “bull's-eye” postmark on both the receipt and the envelope or wrapper.

The only acceptable evidence to establish the time of receipt at the U.S. Department of Labor is the date/time stamp of the Procurement Service Center on the application wrapper or other documentary evidence or receipt maintained by that office.

All applicants are advised that U.S. mail delivery in the Washington, DC area has been slow and erratic due to concerns involving anthrax contamination. Applicants must take this into consideration when preparing to meet the application deadline. It is recommended that you confirm receipt of your application with your delivery service.

D. Funding Levels

Up to U.S. $1 million is available for this project, and USDOL reserves the right to award more than one grant. USDOL may award one or more grants to one or more organizations or to a partnership of more than one organization. The award of any sub-contract will be subject to USDOL approval (see Section IV).

E. Program Duration

The duration of the project funded by this SGA is up to four (4) years. The start date of program activities will be negotiated upon award of the grant, which will take place no later than September 30, 2003.

III. Statement of Work

USDOL is seeking qualified organizations that will implement, in partnership with USDOL, a project to assist in stemming the spread of HIV/AIDS/STI/TB infections among workers in Uganda through partnerships between U.S. organizations and local, community and/or faith-based organizations in Uganda that will develop and implement effective prevention strategies. Specific project objectives are identified in Section III.C. USDOL encourages applicants to be creative in proposing innovative and cost-effective interventions that will produce a demonstrable and sustainable impact.

Proposals should demonstrate organizations' capabilities to implement projects in accordance with the Statement of Work and the rating criteria (Section XI). Funds will be provided by grant to qualifying organizations. The grant will be actively managed by USDOL/ILAB to assure achievement of the stated project objectives. The award of any sub-contract will be subject to USDOL policies and approval (see Section IV).

Note:

Selection of an organization as a Grantee does not constitute approval of the grant application as submitted. Before the actual grant is awarded, USDOL may enter into negotiations about such items as program components, funding levels, and administrative systems in place to support grant implementation. If the negotiations do not result in a mutually acceptable submission, the Grant Officer reserves the right to terminate the negotiation and decline to fund the application. Award is also contingent upon signature of a letter of agreement between USDOL and relevant ministries in target countries.

A. Background and Problem Statement

1. International HIV/AIDS Pandemic

According to the International Labor Organization (ILO), over 42 million people around the world are infected with HIV. At least 26 million are workers aged 15 to 49, who are in the prime of their working lives. Typically, half of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) become infected before they turn 25 years old, acquiring AIDS and dying by the time they turn 35, leaving behind a generation of children to be raised by grandparents or by older siblings, many of whom are barely adults themselves. Although HIV/AIDS was initially viewed strictly as a health crisis, it is now acknowledged to have a severe impact on the economic and social development of affected countries. Health authorities, therefore, have recognized that a multi-sectoral approach is necessary to fully address the HIV/AIDS crisis.

Recent studies by the ILO regarding the impact of HIV/AIDS on the workforce warn of the catastrophic consequences of HIV/AIDS/STI for workers and employers worldwide. These studies project a severe decline in the size and quality of the workforce in a number of countries over the next 20 years. According to the ILO, the most affected countries in sub-Saharan Africa with prevalence rates of up to 33 percent of the adult population could lose 29-35 percent of their total workforce by the year 2020. In the case of countries with HIV/AIDS prevalence rates higher than 10 percent of the adult population, the labor force in the year 2020 will be an estimated 10-22 percent smaller than if HIV/AIDS did not exist. HIV/AIDS targets the most productive age group, hampering economic development and the workplace environment as well as workers and their families.

2. Stigma and Discrimination

Compounding the negative impact of the spread of HIV/AIDS is the fact the disease is accompanied by significant stigma and discrimination, and these factors often inhibit prevention efforts. In many cases, the discrimination and social stigmatization which greet individuals' real or perceived HIV status creates a climate of fear and denial, discouraging people from choosing responsible behavior changes, from being tested to learn one's HIV status to seeking appropriate treatment. One fundamental precept of an effective prevention program, therefore, is the inclusion of an anti-stigma/discrimination component. Given the nature and importance of addressing these issues, faith-based efforts that seek the involvement of the broad community may be uniquely positioned to address issues of stigma and discrimination.

3. Impact on Workers and Families

In sub-Saharan Africa, where the epidemic is most advanced, skilled personnel have been lost and youth have not been able to replace their skills and experience, in part because of a lack of access to work and educational opportunities. Many women are expected to care for sick relatives and are therefore unable to maintain their jobs or work in the family's agricultural fields. Many children, particularly girls, are expected to stay home and take care of sick relatives, or to supplement the family income, rather than attend school. Some children and/or youth have been orphaned and have resorted to child labor to sustain themselves and their siblings. The pressure on affected families exacerbates already-existing problems such as poverty levels and child labor.

4. Engagement of Faith-Based And Community Organizations

On January 29, 2001, President George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13198, creating the Office for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives (FBCI) in the White House and corresponding centers for FBCI in the Departments of Labor (DOL), Health and Human Services (HHS), Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Education (ED), and Justice (DOJ). President Bush has charged these centers to identify statutory, regulatory, and bureaucratic barriers that stand in the way of effective faith-based and community initiatives, and to ensure—consistent with the law—that these organizations have an equal opportunity to compete for Federal funding and other support.

As USAID Assistant Administrator for Global Health E. Anne Peterson has stated, “USAID's HIV/AIDS programs now focus on promoting abstinence and delaying the onset of sexual activity, and when appropriate, the use of condoms.” As a result, the Administration is promoting internationally a balanced “ABC” approach toward HIV/AIDS prevention (“Abstinence, Be Faithful/Behavior Change, and, if necessary, use a Condom”). This approach is based largely upon success in Uganda with this method, which has included the participation of many faith-based organizations. Applicants should indicate how they will build upon this experience.

Faith-based and/or community-based organizations often present strong credentials to partner in our efforts to combat the spread of HIV/AIDS infections. Faith-based and community-based organizations often are trusted institutions in developing countries around the world. These organizations are often home to a large number of volunteers who bring not only the power of personal relationships to the provision of social service but also a sustained allegiance to the well-being and self-sufficiency of the participants they serve. Through this Grant, USDOL will strive to leverage these programs, resources and committed staff to effectively address HIV/AIDS in Uganda.

B. Objectives

The Grantee(s) will implement, in partnership with USDOL, a project designed to meet the following objectives:

• To promote the “ABC” method and other effective methods of HIV/AIDS prevention among workers in the workplace and in surrounding communities, in partnership with qualifying Ugandan community and/or faith-based organizations;
• To strengthen the capacity of qualifying Ugandan community and/or faith-based organizations to assess HIV/AIDS issues and to develop and implement effective strategies to combat HIV/AIDS; and
• To strengthen the financial and administrative systems of qualifying Ugandan community and/or faith-based organizations to diversify their funding sources, and to enhance their capacity to manage their resources efficiently, in order to sustain the vital services they provide to Ugandan communities.

C. Type of Work to Be Performed/Activities

The selected Grantee(s) will be responsible for developing a strategy for successfully achieving the stated objectives of the project, addressing the problems identified in the Background and Problem Statement, developing and implementing the major tasks to be accomplished as part of that strategy, tracking and reporting on progress in achieving the stated objectives, and providing any necessary related services.

D. Expected Outcomes/Project Outputs

By the end of the grant period, the project will have:

• Increased the number of Ugandan men and women educated and trained in the “ABC” method and other effective methods of HIV/AIDS prevention.
• Strengthened the capacity of one or more Ugandan community, grassroots, and/or faith-based organizations to combat HIV/AIDS.
• Created a sustainable partnership between U.S-based and Ugandan community, grassroots, and/or faith-based organizations working in the areas of HIV/AIDS prevention and mitigation.

The selected Grantee(s) will be responsible for identifying and producing outputs/results/deliverables that will support achievement of these expected outcomes.

E. Deliverables

Following the award of the grant, the Grantee(s) shall collaborate with USDOL/ILAB to:

• Develop a Project Document (including a project budget) that will set the technical parameters and provide guidance to the project. It should include all information and be prepared according to the standardized format outlined by USDOL. While the Applicant's original proposal will serve as the basis of the Project Document, in every case USDOL has found it advantageous to visit the field and reach consensus on the project strategy with host country counterparts in order to further inform the project design. USDOL must receive a draft of the Project Document 45 days after returning from travel to the relevant area(s). The Project Document must be finalized no later than 30 days after receipt of USDOL comments on the draft.
• Establish a Workplan identifying major project activities, deadlines for their completion, and person(s) responsible for completing these activities (within 60 days after the Project Document is finalized).
• Set project indicators, including indicators that support ILAB's Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) goal, “Improve living standards and conditions of work for workers in developing and transition countries.” (within 90 days of finalizing the Project Document).
• Create a Performance Monitoring Plan (PMP) to establish the data needed to measure achievement of project indicators and the methods for collection and reporting. It should include all information and be prepared according to the standardized format outlined by USDOL (within 90 days of finalizing the Project Document).
• Develop spotlight stories that highlight activities and illuminate best practices being undertaken by sub-contractors (on an annual basis).
• Present innovative models addressing the project objectives (at the halfway point and conclusion of the project).

The Grantee(s) must submit copies of all required documents to USDOL by the specified due dates. Other documents that may be produced are to be submitted by mutually agreed-upon deadlines. The Project Document, Workplan, project indicators, PMP, and data collection system are subject to final approval by the Grant Officer's Technical Representative (GOTR) responsible for monitoring the grant.

F. Special Program Requirements

1. USDOL Responsibilities

Following the award of the grant(s), USDOL shall:

• Provide the Grantee(s) with programmatic support to help ensure effective implementation of the project, including training and consultation in USDOL/ILAB management, monitoring, and evaluation systems and standard operating procedures.
• Provide advice and consultation to Grantee(s) on specific program criteria.
• If, based upon the responses to this solicitation and subsequent to the award, USDOL determines that it is necessary, travel to the field with the Grantee(s) and other technical experts for a project design mission before finalizing the project design and the Project Document. USDOL will procure the services of technical experts if it determines that such expertise is necessary for the project design mission.
• Fund at least two project evaluations—a mid-term evaluation at approximately the midpoint of the grant period and a final evaluation approximately two months prior to the end of the grant period. USDOL/ILAB—in consultation with the Grantee(s)—will be responsible for drafting and finalizing all evaluation Terms of Reference (TOR), procuring the services of an independent evaluator (who will write the evaluation report), and providing at least one representative from USDOL/ILAB to participate on the evaluation team, when appropriate. USDOL/ILAB may choose to perform additional evaluations as appropriate.
• Have the right, at all reasonable times, to review all documents pertaining to the project, participate on field missions (including monitoring and evaluation missions), and to discuss administrative and technical issues pertaining to the project with the Grantee.

2. Grantee Responsibilities

Following the award of the grant(s), the Grantee(s) shall:

• Establish the institutional and management systems and means necessary to provide and monitor the delivery of services and to distribute wages and material effectively.
• If USDOL determines that it is necessary, travel to the field with USDOL and other technical experts for a project design mission before finalizing the project design and the Project Document. The Grantee(s) shall bear the financial costs for having its representative(s) participate on the project design mission.
• Assist in project evaluations, including reviewing and providing comments on the evaluation Terms of Reference (TORs) drafted by USDOL and evaluation reports written by the lead evaluator. If invited to participate on an evaluation mission by USDOL, the Grantee(s) shall bear the financial costs for having a representative of the Grantee(s) participate on an evaluation team (e.g., travel, per diem).
• Submit trip reports to USDOL within fourteen (14) calendar days of project-related travel. If the Grantee travels with a USDOL staff member, the Grantee will submit a draft trip report to the staff member within fourteen (14) calendar days of project-related travel for comments. The format for the trip report will be provided by USDOL.
• Inform USDOL/ILAB at least one (1) month prior to scheduling any major public events or ceremonies regarding the project.
• Submit to USDOL all media-related and educational materials developed by it or its sub-contractors under this Grant(s), including relevant press releases, for use in this project before they are reproduced, published, or used. The Grantee(s) must consult with USDOL to ensure that materials are compatible with USDOL materials relating to its International Cooperation Program. USDOL considers brochures, pamphlets, videotapes, slide-tape shows, curricula, and any other training materials used in the project to be educational materials. USDOL will review materials for technical accuracy. USDOL will also review training curricula and purchased training materials for accuracy before they are used. The Grantee(s) must obtain prior approval from the Grant Officer for all materials developed or purchased under this grant. All materials produced by Grantee(s) must be provided to USDOL in digital format for possible publication.

IV. Key Personnel and Sub-Contractors

USDOL considers the following job position(s) to be “key personnel” in this project:

• Project Director.
• Ugandan-based Project Coordinator.

The Grant Officer must approve candidates for all key personnel positions. USDOL's Grant Officer's Technical Representative (GOTR) shall review candidates' qualifications and provide recommendations to the Grant Officer regarding the selection of candidates for all key personnel positions. The Grantee(s) shall submit resumes, curricula vitae, and other relevant information to the GOTR and receive approval from the Grant Officer before extending an offer of employment and before the nominated individual conducts any activities.

Key personnel may only be changed with the approval of the Grant Officer. The Grantee(s) shall not substitute or replace key personnel unless new personnel are at least equal in qualifications to those personnel who are replaced. If a need to find new key personnel arises, the Grantee(s) shall notify the GOTR as soon as the need becomes known. If the Grant Officer is unable to approve the personnel change, he/she reserves the right to terminate the grant.

Organizations may apply for funding in partnership with other organizations, but in such a case, a lead organization must be identified. Use of sub-contractors is subject to Federal laws and regulations, including OMB circulars requiring free and open competition for procurement transactions.

The Grant Officer must approve all sub-contractors. USDOL's Grant Officer's Technical Representative (GOTR) shall review candidates' qualifications and provide recommendations to the Grant Officer regarding the selection of candidates for all sub-contractors. The lead organization shall submit a list of previous projects implemented by the proposed sub-contractor, along with a description of qualifications, resumes, curricula vitae, and other relevant information to the GOTR and receive approval from the Grant Officer before extending a sub-contract. The lead organization shall not substitute or replace sub-contractors unless new sub-contractors are at least equal in qualifications to those that are replaced. Sub-contractors may only be changed with the approval of the Grant Officer. If a need to find new sub-contractors arises, the lead organization shall notify the GOTR as soon as the need becomes known.

Note:

Except as specifically provided, USDOL/ILAB acceptance of a proposal and an award of federal funds to sponsor any program(s) does not provide a waiver of any grant requirement and/or procedures. For example, if an application identifies a specific sub-contractor to provide the services, the USDOL/ILAB award does not provide the justification or basis to sole-source the procurement, i.e., to avoid competition.

V. Reporting Requirements

All reports (see Appendix B) are due no later than 30 days after the end of a fiscal quarter and shall be submitted in English. USDOL/ILAB and the Grantee(s) should work together to resolve any issues within 30 days of receipt of a report.

A. Financial Reports

The Grantee(s) shall submit financial reports on a quarterly basis. The first reporting period shall end on the last day of the fiscal quarter (December 31, March 31, June 30, or September 30) during which the grant was signed.

The Grantee(s) shall use Standard Form (SF) 269A, Financial Status Report, to report the status of the funds, at the project level, during the grant period. A final SF269A shall be submitted no later than 90 days following completion of the grant period.

If the Grantee(s) uses the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Payment Management System (HHS PMS), they must also send USDOL copies of the PSC 272 that it submits to HHS, on the same schedule. Otherwise, the Grantee(s) shall submit Standard Form (SF) 272, Federal Cash Transactions Report, on the same schedule as the SF269A.

Financial reports are due within 30 days of the end of the reporting period (i.e., by April 30, July 30, October 30, and January 30).

B. Technical Reporting Requirements

After signing the agreement, the Grantee(s) shall submit progress reports to USDOL/ILAB at the end of each fiscal quarter. The first reporting period shall end on the last day of the fiscal quarter (December 31, March 31, June 30, or September 30) during which the Grant was signed. Between reporting dates, the Grantee(s) shall also immediately inform USDOL/ILAB of significant developments and/or problems affecting the organization's ability to accomplish work.

The Grantee(s) shall submit two types of progress reports according to the standardized format used by USDOL/ILAB:

1. Status Reports

Status Reports compare actual and planned activities during the reporting period, which consists of one quarter (January-March and July-September). Its purpose is to provide an update on the Workplan, problems/solutions, major achievements, or modifications. The Status Report should be brief and include an attached project Workplan indicating the status of Workplan activities: “completed,” “on schedule,” “delayed,” “cancelled.” The body of report should provide a summary explanation of any deviation from the Workplan and recommended actions.

Two Status Reports are due per year within 30 days of the end of the reporting period (i.e., by April 30 and October 30).

2. Technical Progress Reports

Technical Progress Reports provide information on how the project is progressing in achieving its stated objectives. Technical Progress Reports will be based on the project's stated objectives, indicators, and Performance Monitoring Plan (PMP) and will provide both quantitative and qualitative information and a narrative assessment of performance for the preceding six-month period (January-June and July-December). Data measuring achievement of the project's indicators will be attached to the narrative, which will provide a composite overview of progress, trends, problems, new proposals, lessons learned, and expenditures. The body of the Technical Progress Report should be 2-3 pages in length, stressing major points related to strategy.

Two Technical Progress Reports are due per year within 30 days of the end of the reporting period (i.e., by July 30 and January 30).

C. Instructions for Submitting Reports

All reports shall cite the assigned grant number. The Grantee(s) shall submit one hard copy of all financial reports to each of the following persons:

Lawrence Kuss, Grant Officer, Procurement Services Center, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave., NW, Room N-5416, Washington, DC 20210

Celeste Helm, Grant Officer's Technical Representative, Office of Foreign Relations, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave., NW, Room S-5303, Washington, DC 20210

Gene Contee, Accountant, Financial Management Services Center, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave., NW, Room S-5526, Washington, DC 20210

The Grantee(s) shall submit one hard copy of all technical reports to each of the following persons:

Lawrence Kuss, Grant Officer, Procurement Services Center, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave., NW, Room N-5416, Washington, DC 20210.

Celeste Helm, Grant Officer's Technical Representative, Office of Foreign Relations, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave., NW, Room S-5303, Washington, DC 20210

VI. Travel Procedures

The Grantee(s) shall submit a quarterly travel plan to the GOTR. The plan shall include the following information for all individuals traveling for the Grantee(s) to support activities covered by this grant:

• Name of the person(s) who will be traveling
• Destination(s)
• Dates of travel
• Purpose of travel—what they will be doing and why

The Grantee(s) should submit the quarterly travel plan no later than four weeks prior to the start of each subsequent fiscal quarter (e.g., By May 31, the GOTR should have travel plans for all Grantee travel occurring July 1 through September 30). For a trip beginning later than four weeks from the time the plan is submitted, dates should reflect a “best guess” (rather than simply listing “To Be Determined”). The dates should, however, be finalized no later than 4 weeks prior to departure.

All travelers should submit finalized travel details to the GOTR no later than 4 weeks prior to the desired departure date. If any major holiday occurs during those 4 weeks, travelers should submit finalized details earlier.

Individuals are not permitted to travel until USDOL/ILAB has received country clearance from the State Department (via e-mail or cable) or has received written authorization (including by e-mail) from the GOTR. This also applies to expatriates living abroad who go on personal or home leave: although they do not need clearance to enter the U.S., they do need clearance to re-enter the country in which they are stationed.

While travelers may cancel trips at any time, USDOL/ILAB will not permit any amendments to a clearance cable (e.g., for changes in dates of travel, or changes in the identified traveler) less than four weeks prior to the desired date of departure, except in dire emergencies, as determined by the GOTR.

VII. Acknowledgment of USDOL Funding

A. Acknowledgement on Printed Materials

In all circumstances, the following shall be displayed on printed materials: “Preparation of this item was funded by the United States Department of Labor under Grant No. [insert the appropriate Grant number].”

When issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposals, bid solicitations, and other documents describing projects or programs funded in whole or in part with Federal money, all Grantees receiving Federal funds must clearly state:

• The percentage of the total costs of the program or project, which will be financed with Federal money;
• The dollar amount of Federal funds for the project or program; and
• The percentage and dollar amount of the total costs of the project or program that will be financed by non-governmental sources.

B. Use of the USDOL Logo

In consultation with ILAB, the Grantee(s) will acknowledge USDOL's role in one of the following ways:

• The USDOL logo may be applied to USDOL-funded material prepared for world-wide distribution, including posters, videos, pamphlets, research documents, national survey results, impact evaluations, best practice reports, and other publications of global interest. The Grantee(s) must consult with USDOL on whether the logo may be used on any such items prior to final draft or final preparation for distribution. In no event shall the USDOL logo be placed on any item until USDOL has given the Grantee written permission to use the logo on the item.
• All documents should include the following notice: “This document does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Labor, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.”

VIII. Administrative Requirements

A. General

Grantees, which may include faith-based organizations, will be subject to applicable Federal laws (including provisions of appropriations law) and the applicable Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circulars. Determinations of allowable costs will be made in accordance with the applicable Federal cost principles, e.g., Non-Profit Organizations—OMB Circular A-122. The grant(s) awarded under this SGA will be subject to the following administrative standards and provisions, if applicable:

• 29 CFR Part 36—Federal Standards for Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance.
• 29 CFR Part 93—New Restrictions on Lobbying.
• 29 CFR Part 95—Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Non-Profit Organizations, and with Commercial Organizations, Foreign Governments, Organizations Under the Jurisdiction of Foreign Governments and International Organizations.
• 29 CFR Part 96—Federal Standards for Audit of Federally Funded Grants, Contracts and Agreements.
• 29 CFR Part 98—Federal Standards for Government wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) and Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Grants).
• 29 CRF Part 99—Federal Standards for Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations.

B. Sub-Contracts

Sub-contracts must be awarded in accordance with 29 CFR 95.40-48.

C. Encumbrance of Grant Funds

Grant funds may not be encumbered/obligated by the Grantee(s) before or after the period of performance. Encumbrances/obligations outstanding as of the end of the grant period may be liquidated (paid out) after the end of the grant period. Such encumbrances/obligations may involve only commitments for which a need existed during the grant period and which are supported by approved contracts, purchase orders, requisitions, invoices, bills, or other evidence of liability consistent with the Grantee's purchasing procedures and incurred within the grant period. All encumbrances/ obligations incurred during the grant period must be liquidated within 90 days after the end of the grant period, if practicable.

D. Site Visits

USDOL, through its authorized representatives, has the right, at all reasonable times, to make site visits to review project accomplishments and management control systems and to provide such technical assistance as may be required. If USDOL makes any site visit on the premises of the Grantee or a sub-contractor(s) under this grant, the Grantee must provide and must require its sub-contractors to provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of the Government representatives in the performance of their duties. All site visits and evaluations will be performed so as not to unduly delay the work.

IX. Grant Closeout Procedures

A. Definitions

1. Grant Closeout

The closeout of a grant is the process by which a Federal grantor agency determines that all applicable administrative actions and all required work of the grant have been completed by the grantee and the grantor.

2. Date of Completion

The date when all work under a grant is completed or the date in the grant award document, or any supplement or amendment thereto, on which Federal assistance ends, whichever comes first.

3. Disallowed Costs

Disallowed costs are those charges to a grant that the grantor agency or its representative determines to not be allowed in accordance with the applicable Federal Cost Principles or other conditions contained in the grant.

B. Close-out Procedures

Grants shall be closed out in accordance with the following procedures:

• Upon request, the Grantor shall make prompt payments to a Grantee for allowable reimbursable costs under the grant being closed out.
• The Grantee shall immediately refund to the Grantor any balance of unobligated (unencumbered) cash advanced to the Grantee that is not authorized for retention by the Grantee for use on other grants.
• Within 90 days after completion of the grant, the Grantee shall submit all financial, performance and other reports required by the Grant Officer to close out the grant. The Grant Officer may authorize extensions when requested by the grantee.
• The Grant Officer shall make a settlement for any upward or downward adjustments to the Federal share of costs after these reports are received.
• In the case of grants that include matching/in-kind contributions, the Grantee is legally required to provide the total amount of matching/in-kind contributions indicated on the face sheet of the agreement, as amended. Failure to provide this level of matching/in-kind contribution shall result in the disallowance of all or part of otherwise allowable Federal share costs, equal to the total matching/in-kind share committed to, less the share actually provided.
• The Grantee shall account for any property acquired with grant funds, or received from the Government in accordance with the provisions of 29 CFR part 95.
• In the event that a final audit has not been performed prior to the closeout of the grant, the Grantor shall retain the right to recover an appropriate amount after fully considering the recommendations on disallowed costs resulting from the final audit.

X. Measuring the Performance of the Grantee

The performance of the Grantee will be assessed based on the timely completion of one or more deliverables that will be due to USDOL at the end of each quarter of the Grant. These deliverables should reflect the outcomes of the project that are expected to help achieve the project's objective(s). Applicants are requested to include in their proposal a project implementation plan and approach to monitor the performance of the project throughout the period of the grant. The implementation plan is to consist of a quarterly schedule of activities and list of deliverables that would be completed by the contractor each quarter. The defined list and schedule of deliverables is viewed by USDOL as a key component of the technical proposal.

XI. Review and Selection of Applications for Award

USDOL will screen all applications to determine whether all required elements are present and clearly identifiable. A Technical Panel will objectively rate each complete application against the criteria described in this announcement. The panel recommendations to the Grant Officer are advisory in nature. The Grant Officer may elect to select one or more Grantees on the basis of the initial proposal submission, or the Grant Officer may establish a competitive or technically acceptable range for the purpose of selecting qualified applicants. If deemed appropriate, following the Grant Officer's call for the preparation and receipt of final revisions of proposals, the evaluation process described above will be repeated to consider such revisions. The Grant Officer will make a final selection determination based on what is most advantageous to the Government, considering factors such as panel findings, geographic presence of the applicants, and the best value to the government, cost, and other factors. The Grant Officer's determination for award under this SGA is final.

A.The Review Process

The criteria below will serve as the basis upon which submitted applications will be evaluated. Technical aspects of the application will constitute 100 points of the total evaluation. Up to five (5) additional points will be given for leveraging non-Federal resources.

In order to assist USDOL in assessing the efficient and effective allocation of project funding, the Applicant shall submit a project budget that clearly details the costs for performing all of the requirements presented in this solicitation, including producing all deliverables, reporting on implementation and progress, and monitoring progress. Applicants are reminded to budget for compliance with the administrative requirements set forth (copies of all regulations referenced in this SGA are available at no cost, on-line, at http://www.dol.gov). This includes the costs of performing activities such as travel to Washington, DC to meet with USDOL/ILAB, financial audit, project closeout, document preparation (e.g., progress reports, project document), and ensuring compliance with procurement and property standards. The Project Budget should identify administrative costs separately from programmatic costs. In addition to the costs identified previously, administrative costs include indirect costs from the costs pool and the cost of activities, materials (e.g., project car), and personnel (e.g., administrative assistants, office drivers) that support the management and administration of the project but do not provide direct services to project beneficiaries.

The technical panel will review grant applicants against the criteria listed below on the basis of 100 points.

B. Technical Approach—45 points

• The extent to which the application sets forth a clear and supportable course of action to increase knowledge among Ugandan workers of effective HIV/AIDS prevention practices through: (a) Strategically focused HIV/AIDS prevention education applying the “ABC” and other methods to high-risk groups, (b) partnering with qualified Ugandan community and/or faith-based organizations working in the area of HIV/AIDS prevention to increase their resource base and reach, and (c) mentoring and strengthening the capacity of qualified Ugandan community and/or faith-based organizations to develop and implement sustainable and effective HIV/AIDS prevention strategies. The Applicant will be evaluated on the clear identification and description of the specific strategy(s) the Applicant proposes to use, its effectiveness, and attainability of project objectives by the end of the grant period. (10 points)
• Demonstrated familiarity with the major issues related to the components being addressed (e.g., general project context, key problems and/or needs in the relevant country/area, the specific problem(s) and/or need(s) that will be addressed by this project(s), and relevant constraints). The Applicant will be evaluated on the thorough and accurate assessment of the implementing environment and the problems that exist and clear identification of the specific problem(s) the Applicant proposes to address. (5 points)
• A monitoring and evaluation plan for measuring project performance that includes challenging but realistic targets and measurable, verifiable project indicators that measure achievement of project objectives and performance in project implementation. (5 points)
• A description of the applicant's approach to expending funds in the most cost-effective method possible in order to achieve the project objectives. The applicant should refer to its submitted budget in explaining how the budgeted funds will be utilized cost-effectively. In order to assist USDOL in assessing the efficient and effective allocation of project funding, the Applicant shall submit, at minimum, supporting budget information indicating how the Applicant arrived at estimating the costs of the following items/activities: salaries and benefits for all key personnel, 2-3 key activities proposed by the Applicant under its project design, and closing the project and meeting all USDOL close-out requirements, as stated in this SGA. The Applicant will be evaluated based on the clear identification of all project costs and efficient and effective allocation of funding. The project budget should clearly demonstrate that the total amount and distribution of funds is sufficient to cover the cost of all major project activities identified by the Applicant in its proposal, management of the project, monitoring and evaluation, and project close-out and that the distribution of funds maximizes the provision of goods and/or services to project beneficiaries. This section will be evaluated in accordance with applicable Federal laws and regulations. The budget must comply with Federal cost principles (which can be found in the applicable OMB Circulars) and with ILAB budget requirements contained in the application instructions in Section III of this solicitation. (10 points)
• Use of existing expertise from the recipient country in order to reduce costs and further develop local capacity. (5 points)
• Inclusion of a sustainability strategy that ensures that project improvements will continue after the project ends. (5 points)
• Submission of a schedule of quarterly deliverables that will serve to determine the level of performance of the contractor. The identification of deliverables that are presented in the proposal should be objective, verifiable, and demonstrate progress in achieving project objectives. (5 points)

C. Institutional Qualifications/Past Performance—25 points

• Prior experience working in the area of HIV/AIDS prevention education and/or workplace-based programs in developing countries, especially in Uganda. The application shall include information as an attachment (which will not count towards the page limit) regarding previous grants, contracts, or grants, including (a) the organization for which the work was done, (b) a contact person in that organization with his/her current phone number, (c) the dollar value of the grant, contract, or Grant for the project(s), (d) the time frame and professional effort, either directly by key personnel, by consultants, or under contractual arrangements involved in the project(s), (e) a brief summary of the work performed; and (f) a brief summary of accomplishments. (10 points)
• Clear organizational structure and management plan, illustrating experience with carrying out participatory development activities with organizations (i.e., government ministries, employer organizations, worker organizations, community organizations) and maintaining positive and effective relationships with partners. (10 points)
• Demonstration of strong financial management and internal control systems. (5 points)

D. Experience of Personnel—30 points

• Key personnel with prior experience directly related to the proposed work, including technical and language qualifications, professional competence, relevant academic background, and demonstrated experience. Applicants shall submit a resume for each key personnel proposed, which includes the individual's current employment status and previous work experience, including position title, duties performed, dates in position, employing organizations, and educational background. Duties must be clearly defined in terms of role performed (i.e., manager, team leader, consultant). Resumes shall be included as attachments, which do not count against the page limitation. (20 points)
• Clear management plan demonstrating the staffing requirements and other resources needed to implement the approach. (10 points)

E. Leveraging of Grant Funding—5 points

USDOL will award up to five (5) additional rating points to applications that include non-Federal resources that significantly expand the size and scope of project-related activities. These programs will not be financed by the project, but can complement and enhance project objectives. To be eligible for the additional points, the applicant must list the resource(s), the nature, and possible activities anticipated and any partnerships, linkages, or coordination of activities, cooperative funding, etc.

F.Suggested Outline for Technical Proposal

This outline is provided as a guideline. Organizations may elect a format of their choosing, subject to the requirements of this announcement.

1. Executive Summary

2. Program Description

Goal and Objectives, Background, Technical Approach and Implementation Timetable (Proposed Intervention), Experience of Personnel, Identification of Deliverables and Quarterly Schedule of their submission to determine contractor performance, Staffing Pattern and Project Management Organizational Chart, Leveraging of non-Federal Resources.

3. Attachments

Summaries of other relevant organizational experiences, Resumes of key personnel and signed letters of commitment to the project.

Successful proposals submitted in response to this SGA will be incorporated into the text of the grant with the selected applicant(s).

Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of July, 2003.

Lawrence J. Kuss,

Grant Officer.