2014-19735. Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration  

  • Start Preamble Start Printed Page 49225

    AGENCY:

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

    ACTION:

    Final rule.

    SUMMARY:

    NASA, with the concurrence of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), has adopted as final, without change, an interim rule amending the Supplement Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

    DATES:

    Effective Date: August 20, 2014.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Adam F. Greenstone, Alternate Designated Agency Ethics Official, NASA Office of the General Counsel, 300 E. St. SW., Washington, DC 20546, 202.358.1775, adam.f.greenstone@nasa.gov.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    I. Background

    NASA published an interim rule in the Federal Register at 79 FR 7565 on February 10, 2014, to amend the Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The rule permitted student interns to seek prior approval to engage in outside employment with a NASA contractor, subcontractor, grantee, or party to a NASA agreement in connection with work performed by that entity or under that agreement. The amendments clarified the types of outside employment activities that require approval; streamlined the process for approval; eliminated obsolete position titles; and extended the permissible time period of approval. The interim rule became effective on February 10, 2014. One respondent submitted a comment on the interim rule.

    II. Discussion and Analysis

    The NASA Office of General Counsel reviewed the comment and considered it in development of the final rule.

    A. Summary of Significant Changes

    No changes were made as a result of the public comments.

    B. Analysis of Public Comments

    Comment: The respondent commented that this was a positive regulatory change that would fix the predicament of student interns at NASA being too broadly restricted from engaging in outside employment, and increase interest in NASA's internships.

    Response: The comment supports NASA's regulatory amendments in the interim rule. Previously, student interns generally were barred from employment with an entity performing work under a NASA contract, grant, or Space Act agreement in connection with that work. In making this regulatory change, NASA concluded that the previous prohibition was unnecessarily broad, and that the integrity of NASA's operations will not be diminished by liberalizing the current prohibition to permit student interns to seek approval to engage in outside activities with these entities. Student interns typically perform basic research functions without substantial involvement in NASA decisions that affect outside entities, and often spend extended periods in leave without pay status during semesters when they carry a full-time academic workload. It is also vital that students in STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) disciplines have full access to NASA development opportunities to maintain U.S. leadership in these fields. For these reasons, NASA, with OGE's concurrence, retained but liberalized this provision in a revised paragraph (c) of § 6901.103 to permit management to approve such activities of student interns when NASA ethics officials determine that the activity would comply with Federal ethics laws and OGE regulations, to which employed student interns remain subject.

    III. Regulatory Analysis Section

    Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because this rule only pertains to NASA employees.

    Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if the regulation is necessary, to select the regulatory approach that maximizes net benefits. This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, because this rule relates solely to the internal operations of NASA. Therefore, the Office of Management and Budget did not review this rule.

    Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) does not apply to this rule because it does not contain any information collection requirement that requires approval of the Office of Management and Budget.

    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

    This rule relates to agency management or personnel, and therefore the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) does not cover the rule.

    Executive Order 13132, Federalism

    This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 13132, Federalism, NASA has determined that the rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the Start Printed Page 49226preparation of a federalism summary impact statement.

    Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    For the purposes of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. chapter 25, subchapter II), this rule would not significantly or uniquely affect small governments and would not result in increased expenditures by State, local, and tribal governments, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more (as adjusted for inflation) in any one year.

    Start List of Subjects

    List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 6901

    • Ethical conduct
    End List of Subjects

    Interim Rule Adopted as Final Without Change

    Start Amendment Part

    Accordingly, the interim rule amending 5 CFR part 6901, which was published in the Federal Register at 79 FR 7565 on February 10, 2014, is adopted as a final rule without change.

    End Amendment Part Start Signature

    Dated: August 13, 2014.

    Charles F. Bolden Jr.,

    Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

    Walter M. Shaub, Jr.,

    Director, United States Office of Government Ethics.

    End Signature End Supplemental Information

    [FR Doc. 2014-19735 Filed 8-19-14; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 7510-13-P

Document Information

Published:
08/20/2014
Department:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
2014-19735
Pages:
49225-49226 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Number-2014-0001
RINs:
2700-AE03: Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2700-AE03/supplemental-standards-of-ethical-conduct-of-the-national-aeronautics-and-space-administration
Topics:
Conflict of interests
PDF File:
2014-19735.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» National Space Grant College and Fellowship Program
» Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplements: Award Term
» Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplements: Revised Voucher Submission and Payment Process
» Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Award Term
» Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Removal of Engineering Change Proposals Clause
» Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplements: Clarification of Award Fee Evaluations and Payments
» Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Technical Amendments
» Removal of Outdated and Duplicative Guidance
» Denied Access to NASA Facilities
» Profit and Fee under Federal Financial Assistance Awards
CFR: (1)
5 CFR 6901