99-14313. Nectarines and Peaches Grown in California; Revision of Reporting Requirements for Fresh Nectarines and Peaches; Request for Revision to Currently Approved Information Collections  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 108 (Monday, June 7, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 30252-30256]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-14313]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Parts 916 and 917
    
    [Docket No. FV99-916-3 PR]
    
    
    Nectarines and Peaches Grown in California; Revision of Reporting 
    Requirements for Fresh Nectarines and Peaches; Request for Revision to 
    Currently Approved Information Collections
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule invites comments on proposed revisions to the rules 
    and regulations of the marketing orders (orders) for fresh nectarines 
    and peaches grown in California pertaining to reporting requirements. 
    This rule also announces the Agricultural Marketing Service's (AMS) 
    intention to request a revision to the currently approved information 
    collection requirements issued under the orders. The orders regulate 
    the handling of nectarines and peaches grown in California and are 
    administered locally by the Nectarine Administrative and Peach 
    Commodity Committees (committees). Under the orders, authority is 
    provided for the committees to require handlers to file reports on the 
    destinations of their shipments of fresh nectarines and peaches. This 
    rule would require handlers to file such destination reports. 
    Additional and timely information would thus be available to the 
    committees and industry, facilitating improved decisionmaking and 
    program administration with regard to marketing research and 
    development, and promotional activities.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by August 6, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
    concerning this proposal. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, 
    Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, room 2525-S, P.O. Box 96456, 
    Washington, DC 20090-6456; Fax: (202) 720-5698; or E-mail: 
    moab.docketclerk@usda.gov. All comments should reference the docket 
    number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal 
    Register and will be made available for public inspection at the Office 
    of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry Vawter, Marketing Specialist, or 
    Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing Field Office, 
    Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, 
    AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721; 
    telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906; or George Kelhart, 
    Technical Advisor, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and 
    Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, room 2525-S, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, 
    DC 20090-6456; telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-5698. Small 
    businesses may request information on compliance with this regulation, 
    or obtain a guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty 
    crop marketing agreements and orders by contacting Jay Guerber, 
    Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, 
    AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room 2525-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456; 
    telephone: (202) 720-2491; Fax: (202) 205-5698; or E-mail: 
    Jay.Guerber@usda.gov. You may view the marketing agreement and order 
    small business compliance guide at the following web site: http://
    www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal is issued under Marketing 
    Agreements Nos. 124 and 85, and Marketing Order Nos. 916 and 917 (7 CFR 
    parts 916 and 917) regulating the handling of nectarines and peaches 
    grown in California, respectively, hereinafter referred to as the 
    ``orders.'' The marketing agreements and orders are effective under the 
    Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
    674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this proposed 
    rule in conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
    Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
    This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or 
    policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
    rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the 
    petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the petition. 
    The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any 
    district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her 
    principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the Secretary's 
    ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 
    days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        This proposal invites comments on revisions to the orders' rules 
    and regulations pertaining to reporting requirements under the orders. 
    This rule would establish procedures in the orders' rules and 
    regulations for handlers to file reports on the destinations of their 
    shipments of fresh nectarines and peaches. Under the orders the term 
    ``handler'' is synonymous with the term ``shipper.'' This proposal was 
    unanimously recommended by the committees at their meetings on December 
    2, 1998.
        In Secs. 916.60 and 917.50 of the orders, authority is provided for 
    the committees to require handlers to file reports with the committees. 
    The information authorized includes, but is not limited to: (1) The 
    name of the shipper and the shipping point; (2) the car or truck 
    license number (or name of the trucker), and identification of the 
    carrier; (3) the date and time of departure; (4) the number and type of 
    containers in the shipment; (5) the quantities shipped, showing 
    separately the variety, grade, and size of the fruit; (6) the 
    destination; and (7) the identification of the inspection certificate 
    or waiver pursuant to which the fruit was handled. Handlers have not 
    been required to
    
    [[Page 30253]]
    
    report the destinations of their shipments of fresh nectarines and 
    peaches.
        The Nectarine Administrative Committee's (NAC) and the Peach 
    Commodity Committee's (PCC) discussions on destination reports were 
    prompted by recommendations of two subcommittees which met prior to the 
    December 2, 1998, committee meetings. At a Domestic Promotion 
    Subcommittee meeting, the merits of destination reports were discussed, 
    among other issues. The subcommittee unanimously recommended adding a 
    requirement to the orders' rules and regulations for destination 
    reports. The subcommittee believed that having information about 
    markets to which nectarines and peaches are shipped would be a valuable 
    marketing tool. The members believed that such information would allow 
    the subcommittee to target markets more effectively for promotion, and 
    permit a more effective analysis of the effectiveness of industry 
    funded media and promotional campaigns. At an International Programs 
    Subcommittee meeting, the merits of destination reports also were 
    discussed. The members of this subcommittee also believed that such 
    reports would provide invaluable information to assist the NAC and PCC 
    in targeting their promotional activities in the most-promising markets 
    for these two fruits.
        The NAC and PCC discussed the subcommittees' recommendations and 
    the merits of destination reporting. Both the NAC and PCC agreed that 
    the establishment of such a report requiring each handler to list the 
    destination of his/her shipments of nectarines and peaches in both 
    domestic and international markets would provide invaluable information 
    and greatly benefit the industries.
        With destination information from handlers, the committees would be 
    able to make better-informed decisions about marketing research and 
    development projects conducted, and gauge the success of such 
    activities knowing the volume of fruit shipped to various markets. With 
    this information, the committees also could direct their marketing 
    research and development activities and funds to the most-promising 
    markets, and tailor the activities to meet the needs of the particular 
    markets, focus on the more successful promotional activities, and 
    target markets based on consumption.
        Current market analysis tools, such as consumer and retail surveys, 
    provide useful information based on a small group of respondents, but 
    specific shipment and destination information will enable the 
    committees to direct their activities to the most successful markets, 
    and perform a more thorough analysis of the benefits of their 
    promotional activities.
        Without exact destination information, the committees do not know 
    precisely the quantities of nectarines and peaches shipped to various 
    markets, and, therefore, may be spending funds on promotional 
    activities not appropriate for the particular market. Experience has 
    shown that certain types of promotion are appropriate for developing 
    markets and other activities are more appropriate when trying to expand 
    markets. With the ability to determine the markets to which nectarines 
    and peaches are not shipped, the committees would have the ability to 
    direct their marketing research and promotion funds to open those 
    markets for future shipments. In addition, such information would 
    permit the committees to constructively evaluate the effectiveness of 
    their marketing promotion and research programs by helping them get a 
    better handle on promotions that have been working and those that have 
    not, and determine the reason(s) for the lack of success. The 
    industries have long recognized the importance of this information in 
    making their promotion activities more effective and in helping sell 
    more nectarines and peaches. They have tried voluntary reporting, but 
    this has not worked.
        The shipping season for nectarines begins April 1 and ends on 
    October 31 of each year, and the shipping season for peaches begins on 
    April 1 and ends on November 23 of each year. The destination report 
    would be required from all handlers by the fifteenth of the month 
    following the month in which the shipments were made. Handlers would be 
    required to report the number of packages of peaches and nectarines, 
    both yellow and white-fleshed, by variety, grade, and size shipped to 
    each destination. Destination information for domestic market shipments 
    would include the city, state, and zip code. Destination information 
    for international market shipments would include the country to which 
    shipped.
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
    economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has 
    prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that 
    they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 300 California nectarine and peach handlers 
    subject to regulation under the orders covering nectarines and peaches 
    grown in California, and about 1,800 producers of these fruits in 
    California. Small agricultural service firms, which includes handlers, 
    have been defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) 
    as those whose annual receipts are less than $5,000,000. Small 
    agricultural producers are defined as those having annual receipts of 
    less than $500,000.
        The committees' staff have estimated that there are less than 20 
    handlers in the industry who could be defined as other than small 
    entities. If the average handler price received were $9.00 per box or 
    box equivalent of nectarines or peaches, a handler would have to ship 
    at least 555,000 boxes to have annual receipts of $5,000,000. Small 
    handlers would, therefore, represent approximately 94 percent of the 
    handlers within the industry. In addition, the staff estimates that 
    there are approximately 400 producers who could be defined as other 
    than small entities. If the average producer price received were $6.00 
    per box or box equivalent for nectarines and $5.65 per box or box 
    equivalent for peaches, producers would have to produce approximately 
    84,000 boxes or box equivalents of nectarines and approximately 89,000 
    boxes or box equivalents of peaches to have annual receipts of 
    $500,000. Therefore, small producer entities would represent 
    approximately 78 percent of the producers within the industry. For 
    these reasons, a majority of the handlers and producers may be 
    classified as small entities.
        This proposal would revise Secs. 916.160 and 917.178 of the orders' 
    administrative rules and regulations to require handlers to file 
    destination reports on a monthly basis during the shipping season by 
    adding a new paragraph (c) to each section. The information obtained 
    from such reports would improve decision making and program 
    administration with regard to marketing research and development 
    activities undertaken to expand shipments of fresh nectarines and 
    peaches domestically and in foreign markets.
        Requiring handlers to file this report on a monthly basis would 
    impose an
    
    [[Page 30254]]
    
    additional reporting burden on both small and large handlers. The 
    report is estimated to take one hour to complete. It is further 
    estimated that handlers would file an average of four destination 
    reports per year, creating an estimated total annual burden of 4 hours 
    per handler. The estimated total industry annual burden is, therefore, 
    estimated at approximately 1,200 hours per year for nectarine and peach 
    shipments each.
        Although this action would create an additional burden on handlers 
    of fresh nectarines and peaches, the benefits of collecting additional 
    and timely information regarding destinations are anticipated to 
    outweigh the estimated increased reporting burden. The committees would 
    have detailed information about markets to which fruit is sent; and, 
    therefore, would be able to make better-informed decisions about 
    marketing research and promotion fund expenditures and activities 
    undertaken. Such reports and forms would be filed by all handlers, 
    regardless of size; and thus, the increased burden would be equitably 
    distributed to all handlers. Finally, as with all Federal marketing 
    orders programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce 
    information requirements and duplication by industry and public-sector 
    agencies.
        In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
    Chapter 35), the information collection requirements that are contained 
    in this rule are being submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
    (OMB) for approval. This rule would not become effective until this 
    additional information collection is approved by the OMB. In addition, 
    the Department has not identified any relevant Federal rules that 
    duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.
        An alternative to this proposed action would be to continue 
    operations without required destination reporting. Most committee 
    members agreed that the value of having destination information 
    outweighed the burden on handlers of filing such reports in terms of 
    targeting marketing and promotion funds and activities. In recent 
    years, the committees have decided to keep their marketing and 
    promotion expenses relatively constant. Because of this, the members 
    felt that greater emphasis should be placed on using the funds to their 
    greatest advantage.
        All members agreed that continuing to spend promotion funds, 
    without the information to be provided by destination reports, was not 
    in the best interest of the industries. It was agreed, that as the 
    percentage of promotion funds either decreases or remains constant in 
    relationship to total committee funds, and as shipments of nectarines 
    and peaches increase over time, detailed information on the 
    destinations of nectarine and peach shipments would be invaluable in 
    targeting promising markets. The committee members also noted that 
    voluntary destination reports have been requested in the past, but very 
    few handlers provided the information. The committees, therefore, voted 
    unanimously at all the meetings to require destination reports from 
    nectarine and peach handlers.
        During the deliberations, some committee members indicated their 
    concern that destination information would not be kept confidential by 
    committee staff. The Act states, in part, in section 608d(2), that 
    ``all information furnished to or acquired by the Secretary of 
    Agriculture pursuant to this section, as well as information for 
    marketing order programs that is categorized as trade secrets and 
    commercial or financial information * * * shall be kept confidential by 
    all officers and employees of the Department of Agriculture.'' In 
    addition, Secs. 916.60(d) and 917.50(d) also require committee 
    employees to maintain confidentiality of all reports and records 
    submitted by handlers. Therefore, each handler is generally protected 
    against disclosure of any confidential information the handler 
    furnishes to the committees. Persons found guilty of the unauthorized 
    disclosure of confidential information could be subject to a fine, 
    imprisonment, or both, or could be removed from office.
        The committee meetings were widely publicized throughout the tree 
    fruit industry and all interested persons were invited to express their 
    views and participate in committee deliberations. Like all committee 
    meetings, the December 2, 1998, meetings were public meetings, and all 
    entities, large and small, were able to express their views on this 
    issue. The subcommittees meetings were also public meetings at which 
    large and small entities were invited to express their views and 
    participate in deliberations. Finally, interested persons are invited 
    to submit information on the regulatory and informational impacts of 
    this action on small businesses.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act (Nectarines)
    
        In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
    Chapter 35), this notice announces the Agricultural Marketing Service's 
    (AMS) intention to request a revision to a currently approved 
    information collection for Nectarines Grown in California, Marketing 
    Order No. 916.
        Title: Nectarines Grown in California, Marketing Order 916.
        OMB Number: 0581-0072.
        Expiration Date of Approval: May 31, 2000.
        Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved information 
    collection.
        Abstract: Marketing order programs provide an opportunity for 
    producers of fresh fruits, vegetables, and specialty crops, in a 
    specified production area, to work together to solve marketing problems 
    that cannot be solved individually. Order regulations help ensure 
    adequate supplies of high quality product and adequate returns to 
    producers. Under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 
    (AMAA), as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), industries enter into marketing 
    order programs. The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to oversee 
    the order operations and issue regulations recommended by a committee 
    of representatives from each commodity industry.
        The California nectarine marketing order program, which has been 
    operating since 1958, authorizes the issuance of grade, size, maturity 
    regulations, inspection requirements, and marketing and production 
    research, including paid advertising. Regulatory provisions apply to 
    nectarines shipped within and out of the area of production to any 
    market, except those specifically exempted by the marketing order.
        The order and its rules and regulations authorize the Nectarine 
    Administrative Committee (committee), the agency responsible for local 
    administration of the order, to require handlers and producers to 
    submit certain information. Much of this information is compiled in the 
    aggregate and provided to the industry to assist in marketing 
    decisions. The information collection requirements in this request are 
    essential to carry out the intent of the AMAA, to provide the 
    respondents the type of service they request, and to administer the 
    California nectarine marketing order program.
        The Committee has developed forms as a convenience to persons who 
    are required to file information with the Committee that is needed to 
    carry out the purposes of the Act and the order. These forms require 
    the minimum information necessary to effectively carry out the 
    requirements of the order, and their use is necessary to fulfill the 
    intent of the AMAA as expressed in the order, and the rules and 
    regulations issued under the order.
    
    [[Page 30255]]
    
        The information collected is used only by authorized 
    representatives of the USDA, including AMS, Fruit and Vegetable Program 
    regional and headquarters staff, and authorized employees of the 
    committee. Authorized committee employees and the industry are the 
    primary users of the information and AMS is the secondary user.
        This proposed collection consists of a new requirement for handlers 
    to provide information about the destination(s) of nectarine shipments. 
    With shipment destination information from handlers, the committee 
    would be able to make better-informed decisions about the marketing 
    research and development projects conducted. The committee could direct 
    its marketing research and development funds to the most-promising 
    markets. The committee might determine that it is spending funds for 
    promotional activities in markets with limited expansion opportunities. 
    The committee might also find that it is spending too much money in a 
    market where promotion is no longer needed, or only needed to a limited 
    extent. Having information about markets to which nectarines are 
    shipped would be a valuable marketing tool. Not only would such 
    information permit the committee to target markets more effectively for 
    promotion, it would also permit effective measurement of media use and 
    promotional campaigns.
        Section 501(c) of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform 
    Act of 1996 requires each advertising program under the oversight of 
    the Department to fund an independent analysis of the effectiveness of 
    the program at least every five years, unless otherwise provided by 
    law. Information on shipment destinations would be useful in performing 
    these analyses for California nectarines.
        The proposed revision to the currently approved information 
    requirements issued under the order is as follows:
        Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of 
    information is estimated to average 1.0 hour per response.
        Respondents: Handlers of fresh nectarines produced in California.
        Estimated Number of Respondents: 300.
        Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 4.
        Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 1,200 hours.
        Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of 
    information is necessary for the functioning of the California 
    nectarine marketing order program and USDA's oversight of that program; 
    (2) the accuracy of the collection burden estimate and the validity of 
    methodology and assumptions used in estimating the burden on 
    respondents; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
    the information requested; and (4) ways to minimize the burden, 
    including use of automated or electronic technologies.
        Comments should reference OMB No. 0581-0072 and the California 
    Nectarine Marketing Order No. 916, and be sent to the USDA in care of 
    the docket clerk at the address referenced above. All comments received 
    will be available for public inspection during regular business hours 
    at the same address.
        All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the 
    request for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public 
    record.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act (Peaches)
    
        In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
    Chapter 35), this notice announces the Agricultural Marketing Service's 
    (AMS) intention to request a revision to a currently approved 
    information collection for Peaches Grown in California, Marketing Order 
    No. 917.
        Title: Peaches Grown in California, Marketing Order 917.
        OMB Number: 0581-0080.
        Expiration Date of Approval: July 31, 2000.
        Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved information 
    collection.
        Abstract: Marketing order programs provide an opportunity for 
    producers of fresh fruits, vegetables and specialty crops, in a 
    specified production area, to work together to solve marketing problems 
    that cannot be solved individually. Order regulations help ensure 
    adequate supplies of high quality product and adequate returns to 
    producers. Under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 
    (AMAA), as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), industries enter into marketing 
    order programs. The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to oversee 
    the order operations and issue regulations recommended by a committee 
    of representatives from each commodity industry.
        The California peach marketing order program, which has been 
    operating since 1939, authorizes the issuance of grade, size, maturity 
    regulations, inspection requirements, and marketing and production 
    research, including paid advertising. Regulatory provisions apply to 
    peaches shipped within and out of the area of production to any market, 
    except those specifically exempted by the marketing order.
        The order and its rules and regulations authorize the Peach 
    Commodity Committee (committee), the agency responsible for local 
    administration of the order, to require handlers and producers to 
    submit certain information. Much of this information is compiled in the 
    aggregate and provided to the industry to assist in marketing 
    decisions. The information collection requirements in this request are 
    essential to carry out the intent of the AMAA, to provide the 
    respondents the type of service they request, and to administer the 
    California peach marketing order program.
        The Committee has developed forms as a convenience to persons who 
    are required to file information with the Committee that is needed to 
    carry out the purposes of the Act and the order. These forms require 
    the minimum information necessary to effectively carry out the 
    requirements of the order, and their use is necessary to fulfill the 
    intent of the AMAA as expressed in the order, and the rules and 
    regulations issued under the order.
        The information collected is used only by authorized 
    representatives of the USDA, including AMS, Fruit and Vegetable Program 
    regional and headquarters staff, and authorized employees of the 
    committee. Authorized committee employees and the industry are the 
    primary users of the information and AMS is the secondary user.
        This proposed collection consists of a new requirement for handlers 
    to provide information about the destination(s) of peach shipments. 
    With shipment destination information from handlers, the committee 
    would have the ability to make better-informed decisions about the 
    marketing research and development projects conducted. The committee 
    would be able to direct its marketing research and development funds to 
    the most-promising markets. The committee might also determine that it 
    is spending funds in markets with limited expansion potential, or that 
    it is spending too much money in a market where promotion is no longer 
    needed, or only needed to a limited extent. Having information about 
    markets to which peaches are shipped would be a valuable marketing 
    tool. Not only would such information permit the subcommittee to target 
    markets more effectively for promotion, it would also permit effective 
    measurement of media use and promotional campaigns.
        Section 501(c) of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform 
    Act of 1996 requires that each advertising program under the oversight 
    of the Department fund an independent analysis of the effectiveness of 
    the
    
    [[Page 30256]]
    
    program at least every five years, unless otherwise provided by law. 
    Information on shipment destinations would be useful in performing 
    these analyses for California peaches.
        The proposed revision to the currently approved information 
    requirements issued under the order is as follows:
        Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of 
    information is estimated to average 1.0 hour per response.
        Respondents: Handlers of fresh peaches produced in California.
        Estimated Number of Respondents: 300.
        Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 4
        Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 1,200 hours.
        Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of 
    information is necessary for the functioning of the California peach 
    marketing order program and USDA's oversight of that program; (2) the 
    accuracy of the collection burden estimate and the validity of 
    methodology and assumptions used in estimating the burden on 
    respondents; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
    the information requested; and (4) ways to minimize the burden, 
    including use of automated or electronic technologies.
        Comments should reference OMB No. 0581-0080 and the California 
    Peach Marketing Order No. 916, and be sent to the USDA in care of the 
    docket clerk at the address referenced above. All comments received 
    will be available for public inspection during regular business hours 
    at the same address.
        All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the 
    request for OMB approval. All comments will become a matter of public 
    record.
        A 60-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to 
    respond to this proposal.
    
    List of Subjects
    
    7 CFR Part 916
    
        Marketing agreements, Nectarines, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
    7 CFR Part 917
    
        Marketing agreements, Peaches, Pears, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR parts 916 and 917 
    are proposed to be amended as follows:
        1. The authority citation for 7 CFR parts 916 and 917 continues to 
    read as follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
    PART 916--NECTARINES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
    
        2. In Sec. 916.160, paragraph (c) is added to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 916.160  Reporting procedure.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) Destination report. Each shipper who ships nectarines shall 
    furnish to the manager of the Nectarine Administrative Committee a 
    report of the number of packages of nectarines, both yellow-fleshed and 
    white-fleshed, by variety, grade, and size shipped to each destination. 
    The destination is defined as nectarine shipments to any domestic or 
    international market. Destination information for domestic market 
    shipments shall include city, state, and zip code. Destination 
    information for international market shipments shall include the 
    country to which shipped. This report shall be submitted by the 
    fifteenth of each month following the month in which nectarine 
    shipments were made.
    
    PART 917--PEACHES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
    
        3. In Sec. 917.178, paragraph (c) is added to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 917.178  Peaches.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) Destination report. Each shipper who ships peaches shall 
    furnish to the manager of the Control Committee a report of the number 
    of packages of peaches, both yellow-fleshed and white-fleshed, by 
    variety, grade, and size shipped to each destination. The destination 
    is defined as peach shipments to any domestic or international market. 
    Destination information for domestic market shipments shall include the 
    city, state, and zip code. Destination information for international 
    market shipments shall include the country to which shipped. This 
    report shall be submitted by the fifteenth of each month following the 
    month in which peach shipments were made.
    
        Dated: June 1, 1999.
    Bernadine M. Baker,
    Acting Deputy Administrator, Fruit and Vegetable Programs.
    [FR Doc. 99-14313 Filed 6-4-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/07/1999
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
99-14313
Dates:
Comments must be received by August 6, 1999.
Pages:
30252-30256 (5 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV99-916-3 PR
PDF File:
99-14313.pdf
CFR: (2)
7 CFR 916.160
7 CFR 917.178