anonymous

Document ID: CMS-2013-0019-0027
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Centers For Medicare & Medicaid Services
Received Date: February 14 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: February 26 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: February 7 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: April 8 2013, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jx-83of-sl35
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

File Code: CMS-3267-P Radiology Services in Ambulatory Surgery Centers I am glad to have this regulation addressed as this has been overly burdensome to the ASC's and this regulation has not been consistently applied across surveyors. My concern is the language in the proposed regulatory body pertaining to the operating surgeon "as part of his or her qualifications in order to be privileged to perform the procedure, to DEMONSTRATE COMPETENCY in using imaging as an integral part of the procedure. By virtue of their training physicians are trained and competent to read and interpret x-rays for the surgeries in which they perform. How exactly would they need to DEMONSTRATE (as this is an action verb) their competency? I am also concerned regarding the language ".....requirement that an MD/DO who is qualified by education and experience in accordance with State law and ASC policy must SUPERVISE the PROVISION of RADIOLOGIC SERVICES." Please define "radiologic services". Radiologic services to me encompasses more than just overseeing x-rays being taken. To me this includes the monitoring of dosimetry badges, annual physicist visits to inspect the c-arm, annual lead shielding integrity checks etc.- these are areas in which physicians are not familiar with and it may be difficult in a small ASC to find a physician willing to take on the legal requirements of overseeing "readiologic services." I would instead recommend requiring individual physicians who use imaging equipment be "privileged" to provide and/or oversee the taking of x-rays and interpretation of the results.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 391
Lelsee Carver
Public Submission    Posted: 02/26/2013     ID: CMS-2013-0019-0024

Apr 08,2013 11:59 PM ET
Anne Sanford, RN, QA Manager
Public Submission    Posted: 02/26/2013     ID: CMS-2013-0019-0025

Apr 08,2013 11:59 PM ET
Joanna Mathews
Public Submission    Posted: 02/26/2013     ID: CMS-2013-0019-0026

Apr 08,2013 11:59 PM ET
Christopher Romano
Public Submission    Posted: 02/26/2013     ID: CMS-2013-0019-0011

Apr 08,2013 11:59 PM ET
anonymous
Public Submission    Posted: 02/26/2013     ID: CMS-2013-0019-0027

Apr 08,2013 11:59 PM ET