Comment from Kevin Maher

Document ID: CPSC-2011-0071-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Consumer Product Safety Commission
Received Date: December 12 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: December 13 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: October 11 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: December 12 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80f80444
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

December 12, 2011 Troy Whitfield Lead Compliance Officer Consumer Product Safety Commission Office of the Secretary 4330 East West Highway, Room 820 Bethesda, MD 20814 Re: Docket No. CPSC-2011-0071 Dear Mr. Whitfield: The American Hotel & Lodging Association (AH&LA) submits these comments on behalf of the lodging industry to express concerns with the recent decision by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to revise its definition of “unblockable drain” and to require retrofitting of affected existing pools by May 28, 2012. AH&LA, the sole national association representing all sectors and stakeholders in the lodging industry, including individual hotel property members, hotel companies, student and faculty members, and industry suppliers, is uniquely positioned to comment on this topic because of the large number of pools our members operate. AH&LA urges the CPSC to nullify the September 28, 2011 vote and hold to its original interpretative rule and definition of an unblockable drain as determined in March, 2010. We are particularly troubled by the fact that this vote took place without allowing pool owners and operators nor state and local authorities an adequate opportunity to comment and explain to the commissioners why such a vote is so severely misguided. For the reasons outlined below, we respectfully submit that the revised rule, as voted on September 28, 2011, will jeopardize the safety of child and adult bathers in general, and provide no benefit - except to certain equipment manufacturers. We also request that the CPSC extend its comment period on this important matter. The implications to pool communities across the country are too important to rush and should be handled properly. In addition AH&LA requests that the CPSC delay implementation of enforcement of this change for one year. Per the issues raised by the CPSC, AH&LA submits the following comments in response. 1) Concern about the absence of due process o

Attachments:

CPSC VGB Retrofit Comments Final

Title:
CPSC VGB Retrofit Comments Final

View Attachment: View as format msw12 View as format pdf

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 19
Comment from James Hayes
Public Submission    Posted: 10/14/2011     ID: CPSC-2011-0071-0002

Dec 12,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Kevin Maher
Public Submission    Posted: 12/13/2011     ID: CPSC-2011-0071-0003

Dec 12,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Stephanie See
Public Submission    Posted: 12/13/2011     ID: CPSC-2011-0071-0004

Dec 12,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Jennifer Hatfield
Public Submission    Posted: 12/13/2011     ID: CPSC-2011-0071-0005

Dec 12,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Justin Dewitt
Public Submission    Posted: 12/13/2011     ID: CPSC-2011-0071-0006

Dec 12,2011 11:59 PM ET