Comment submitted by T. A. Kiefer

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0621-0017
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: March 06 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: March 7 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: February 21 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: April 18 2013, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jx-841o-53fb
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I am the copyright holder of the document submitted with comment 1jx-83ts-bg44 and I hereby grant permission to EPA to display it and make it available for download for purposes of supporting public participation in this comment process. The document is publicly available for download at http://wici.ca/new/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Kiefer-Snake-Oil2.2.pdf . In addition I would like to submit these comments as to why ethanol should be removed from the nation's gasoline supply altogether in the interest of health, the environment, and fuel efficiency. These claims are supported by section 11.1 of the reference above and the several studies cited therein. Ethanol in gasoline: 1. does nothing to reduce tailpipe carbon-monoxide (CO) emission of US cars built since 1993 2. Increases NOx emisssion in low-aromatic fuels 3. Increases aldehyde emissions 4. Increases evaporative emissions (requires a standing EPA waiver) 5. Increases total lifecycle emissions of CO 6. Increases total lifecycle emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) 7. Increases total lifecycle emissions of PM10 particulates 8. Increases total lifecycle emissions of sulfur oxides (SOx) 9. Increases total lifecycle emissions of nitrogen (NOx) 10. decreases energy density of fuel 11. decreases MPG of all gasoline vehicles in the USA 12. increase the speed of percolation and contamination depth of ground plumes of spilled fuel (same as MTBE) 13. increases fuel miscibility with water, complicating ground water and open water cleanup of spills (same as MTBE) 14. should have resulted in an EPA surveillance program for ethanol soil and groundwater contamination just as was done for MTBE, and EPA is wrong to continue delaying this. 15. increases cost of fuel, harming the economy. A blue ribbon panel of experts commissioned by the EPA in 1999 recommended discontinuing the use of all oxygenates in gasoline. EPA needs to heed the science rather than the politics.

Attachments:

Why the United States Should Reject Biofuels as Part of a Rational National Security Energy Strategy

Title:
Why the United States Should Reject Biofuels as Part of a Rational National Security Energy Strategy

Abstract:
WICI Occasional Paper No. 4, January 2013

View Attachment: View as format pdf

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 97
Comment submitted by Captain T. A. Ike Kiefer
Public Submission    Posted: 02/25/2013     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0621-0014

Apr 18,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Leon Jackson, Thumb BioEnergy LLC
Public Submission    Posted: 03/01/2013     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0621-0015

Apr 18,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by T. A. Kiefer
Public Submission    Posted: 03/07/2013     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0621-0017

Apr 18,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by C. Sullivan
Public Submission    Posted: 03/12/2013     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0621-0019

Apr 18,2013 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 03/12/2013     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0621-0018

Apr 18,2013 11:59 PM ET