According to 40 CFR 152.8(b) a product intended to force bees from hives for the
collection of honey crops is not a pesticide, because it is not intended for use
against a pest. WSDA believes that benzaldehyde does not require registration
as a pesticide, but would like to inform EPA that it is still being distributed for use
by beekeepers. WSDA requests that EPA determine if revocation of the tolerance
exemption for benzaldehyde would cause FDA to consider honey extracted from
hives that were treated with benzaldehyde to be adulterated. If revocation of the
tolerance exemption would cause FDA to consider honey extracted from hives to
be adulterated, then WSDA requests that the tolerance exemption for
benzaldehyde be retained. Please contact me at ejohansen@agr.wa.gov if there
are any questions regarding these comments.
Comment submitted by Erik Johansen
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Benzaldehyde, Captafol, Hexaconazole, Paraformaldehyde, Sodium dimethyldithiocarbamate, and Tetradifon; Proposed Tolerance Actions
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 01/26/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0322-0003
Feb 21,2006 11:59 PM ET