Comment submitted by Erik Johansen

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0322-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: January 25 2006, at 08:51 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 26 2006, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 23 2005, at 09:06 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: February 21 2006, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8011d17f
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

According to 40 CFR 152.8(b) a product intended to force bees from hives for the collection of honey crops is not a pesticide, because it is not intended for use against a pest. WSDA believes that benzaldehyde does not require registration as a pesticide, but would like to inform EPA that it is still being distributed for use by beekeepers. WSDA requests that EPA determine if revocation of the tolerance exemption for benzaldehyde would cause FDA to consider honey extracted from hives that were treated with benzaldehyde to be adulterated. If revocation of the tolerance exemption would cause FDA to consider honey extracted from hives to be adulterated, then WSDA requests that the tolerance exemption for benzaldehyde be retained. Please contact me at ejohansen@agr.wa.gov if there are any questions regarding these comments.

Related Comments

   
Total: 1
Comment submitted by Erik Johansen
Public Submission    Posted: 01/26/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0322-0003

Feb 21,2006 11:59 PM ET