Comment submitted by C. Keyes, Utah Divison of Forestry, Fire and State Lands

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0801-0013
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: October 31 2006, at 02:14 PM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: November 1 2006, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: October 13 2006, at 06:10 PM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: November 13 2006, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 801dc01e
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Washington Toxics Petition to Cancel Carbaryl EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0801 To Whom It May Concern, In Utah, the largest concern for private forest landowners is bark beetle induced mortality. Utah forests are currently under attack from several species of western bark beetles. I often suggest silvicultural treatments for long-term management of bark beetles. This type of treatment is frequently not acceptable for most private landowners. When silvicultural treatments do meet landowner objectives, it is exceptionally difficult for private landowners to contract with a logger or complete treatments in a timely manner. In addition, silvicultural management is generally not effective on a small scale or during outbreak situations. Chemical preventative treatment, in the short-term to protect high value trees, is often the only option for the private forest landowner. Chemical treatments for high value trees are expensive, and most private landowners consider all of the trees on their land as high value. Since it is cost prohibitive to treat all trees, it is with a heavy heart that they choose which trees to treat. The emotional attachment landowners have for their trees and the hope that they can be saved inevitably compel landowners to place a lot of confidence in chemical treatments, therefore, they must be highly effective. The application of a chemical is the largest cost for treatment. Some products containing pyrethroid--get adequate results and may be less expensive initially, but are effective for only one year. Carbaryl, applied at a 2% active ingredient solution provides very good protection for about two years. When you include application costs, Carbaryl is the only chemical that currently meets the high efficacy needs at the lowest overall cost. At this time, the loss of Carbaryl as a protective treatment would be a considerable disadvantage to the non-industrial private forest landowner. Sincerely, Colleen Keyes Forest Health Coordinator Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands 1594 W. North Temple, Suite 3520 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5703 (801) 538-5211 colleenkeyes@utah.gov

Attachments:

Comment Attachment submitted by C. Keyes, Utah Divison of Forestry, Fire and State Lands

Title:
Comment Attachment submitted by C. Keyes, Utah Divison of Forestry, Fire and State Lands

View Attachment: View as format msw8

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 32
Comment submitted by B. Sachau
Public Submission    Posted: 10/17/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0801-0003

Nov 13,2006 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous Public Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 10/23/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0801-0005

Nov 13,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by C. J. Fettig, Pacific Southwest Research Station
Public Submission    Posted: 10/25/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0801-0006

Nov 13,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by D. E. Schultz, USDA-Forest Service
Public Submission    Posted: 10/25/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0801-0007

Nov 13,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by B. M. Bulaon, Forest Health Protection
Public Submission    Posted: 10/25/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0801-0008

Nov 13,2006 11:59 PM ET