Comment submitted by Lily Lodhi, Temple University

Document ID: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2003-0012-0070
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: June 20 2006, at 08:03 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: June 22 2006, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: May 23 2006, at 08:01 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: August 21 2006, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8018c007
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

We commend the EPA and its staff in the development of Academic Laboratory Rules. This rule provides greater flexibility than the existing RCRA regulations for laboratories. We are encouraged and look forward to the final rule and ultimate implementation at our facilities. We like to bring to your attention to the following issues related to academic institutions with health care facilities: The inclusion of hospital labs, chemistry stockrooms and photography darkrooms into the definition of a lab in this rule. We are an academic institution with a medical school and associated healthcare facilities. It is not uncommon for our staff to move from one area to another. In addition, darkrooms and stockrooms are often located within a lab suite or laboratory building. I believe that this will cause confusion amongst staff (what rules apply in what areas) when they move and work in different areas. The definition of a lab needs to be broad enough so that these areas can be included without any potential compliance issues. There is only one option for the enforceability of the LMP. That option is keeping the LMP based on performance. Strict compliance with the elements of the LMP would be disastrous and might actually discourage compliance. An example might be if we state in the LMP that all unwanted materials be tagged with a yellow tag. We would be considered out of compliance if a researcher places a white tag (he may have run out of yellow tags) on the chemical instead. In addition, any future improvements to a LMP could be burdensome to implement. Another area that needs to be specifically addressed in this rule is hazard reduction procedures in the laboratory. Currently, labs are limited in this regards due to the regulatory requirements and confusion surrounding what constitutes treatment. It is our belief that academic laboratory researches have the necessary experience and equipment to safely conduct hazard reduction procedures. This could be a very good opportunity to safely reduce the volume of hazardous waste that is generated from a laboratory setting.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 47
Comment submitted by J. Adcock
Public Submission    Posted: 06/12/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2003-0012-0069

Aug 21,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Lily Lodhi, Temple University
Public Submission    Posted: 06/22/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2003-0012-0070

Aug 21,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Mike McNeill, Headquarters Environmental Management Division, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Public Submission    Posted: 07/25/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2003-0012-0071

Aug 21,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by William F. Schultz, Chemical Hygiene Officer, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID)
Public Submission    Posted: 08/02/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2003-0012-0072

Aug 21,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by J. Clark
Public Submission    Posted: 08/02/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2003-0012-0073

Aug 21,2006 11:59 PM ET