George Boggs

Document ID: FAA-2006-26408-0244
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: October 19 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: October 22 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: August 17 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: November 19 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jw-81hs-s41k
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Repair Stations; Comment Period Extension

View Comment

I own and operate a Part 145 Repair Station which does only Avionics repairs and installations. I depend on the maintenance facility here at Moore County Airport (KSOP) to provide aircraft related tooling and equipment, as well as Aircraft Maintenance Manuals. If this is no longer allowed, I would have to spend over $750,000.00 to purchase this equipment, and have no where to put it. I could not afford the increase in insurance and cost to maintain current manuals which I use once a year. I have never been denied access to this material or tooling when I needed it. In short this would put me out of business, which is what I assume you want. I would cut down on the number of facilities you would need to inspect. You have mandated that General aviation aircraft be equipped with the new generation avionics. Who will install this equipment? Maybe you will just ground these pests.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 157
Rex Prickett
Public Submission    Posted: 08/20/2012     ID: FAA-2006-26408-0217

Nov 19,2012 11:59 PM ET
James Bemiss, Jr.
Public Submission    Posted: 09/05/2012     ID: FAA-2006-26408-0231

Nov 19,2012 11:59 PM ET
Glenn Carwell
Public Submission    Posted: 09/05/2012     ID: FAA-2006-26408-0232

Nov 19,2012 11:59 PM ET
Burt Moritz
Public Submission    Posted: 09/05/2012     ID: FAA-2006-26408-0233

Nov 19,2012 11:59 PM ET
Ronald Judy
Public Submission    Posted: 09/18/2012     ID: FAA-2006-26408-0235

Nov 19,2012 11:59 PM ET