This change as stated for FAA-2008-0938 is an excellent move. Yet except for horsepower I believe a person attempting to earn a commercial single or multi engine rating should have at least a sign-off for retractable landing gear as well as constant speed engine.
I did not understand the need for needing the use of high performance complex aircraft for the commercial rating at the time I earned my rating. This, as stated on the internet statement I received, represents a useless need for a flight school to have and maintain such an aircraft. The time then required in such aircraft lent little to the skill of the pilot.
Yet I do recommend at least a sign off by an instructor for a constant speed engine which could be gained on most multi engine training routines.
Gordon
Aarrow-Ranch Aviation
This is comment on Rule
Pilot in Command Proficiency Check and Other Changes to the Pilot and Pilot School Certification Rules
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 09/02/2009 ID: FAA-2008-0938-0002
Nov 30,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 09/02/2009 ID: FAA-2008-0938-0003
Nov 30,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 09/02/2009 ID: FAA-2008-0938-0004
Nov 30,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 09/02/2009 ID: FAA-2008-0938-0005
Nov 30,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 09/08/2009 ID: FAA-2008-0938-0008
Nov 30,2009 11:59 PM ET