) FAA to include the use of remote diagnostics for vibration trends to detect
cracked blades as an alternate to the visual and dimensional checks. FAA has
accepted the use of trend monitoring programs to detect failures as evidence in
AD 89-09-02 Rev 2. If the remote diagnostic system is inoperative the operators
than can use the fan rub strip inspection method. This is very important since the
NPRM paragraph f.2, f.3 & f.6 requires initial and repeat fan rub strip inspections.
2) The NPRM as written will require inspections of the fan rub strips within 20
cycles after the effective date of the AD. FAA is requiring the fan rub strip
inspection based on when the fan blade was release from GE. The clock is
started from cycles since new (CSN) for any engine containing any blade from the
suspect population. Request that the fan rub strip inspection by diagnostics or
visual check be ties to the effective date of the AD, 75 cycles, 100 hours which
ever comes first then institute repetitive inspection until suspect fan blades are
removed. This is in line with paragraph f.6 and g.10. Paragraph f.2 & f.3 should be
removed from the AD.
3) FAA is assuming that Fan Blades are tracked on an individual, S/N basis,
maintenance and inspections performed. The Fan Blades are not a life limited
component as defined in the Chapter 05-11 nor is the inspection interval a
mandatory requirement. Many operators have implemented a method to track
maintenance actions and inspections performed on the fan blades. FAA needs to
include process for determining cyclic limits if the fan blade cycles in service were
not established when the fan blades were introduced into service.
4) The AD as written is far to complex in instructions for accomplishment of
maintenance and the time/cycles allotted to comply with the AD.
This operator is questiong why there was not separate ADs proposed for the RJ
and BJ fleets.
5) Please define in the NPRM the CSLI & HSLI as it pertains to the fan rub strip
inspection.
6) The SB 72-0250 for the Fan abradable Rub strip has a statement that requires
PSE to be contacted if a rub has been observed, increase in depth but there is no
indication of Fan blade Tang cracking. GE SB should be re written to be definitive
It should not include this requirement.
Mesaba Airlines
This is comment on Rule
Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company (GE) CF34-1A, CF34-3A, and CF34-3B Series Turbofan Engines
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 04/15/2009 ID: FAA-2009-0328-0002
Jun 08,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/04/2009 ID: FAA-2009-0328-0003
Jun 08,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/09/2009 ID: FAA-2009-0328-0004
Jun 08,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/09/2009 ID: FAA-2009-0328-0005
Jun 08,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/19/2009 ID: FAA-2009-0328-0006
Jun 08,2009 11:59 PM ET