2011-29011 VOL 76 NOVEMBER 14, 2011 PG 70633 ET SEQ
AMERICAN PUBLIC DOES NOT WANT FSA TO HAVE MORE "FLEXIBILITY". WE HAVE SEEN MANY SITUATIONS WHERE THE TAX DOLLARS GET LOST WITH "FLEXIBILITY". THEY ACHIEVE NOTHING. THEY ARE WASTED AND FRAUD TAKES PLACE.
THE LISTS OF EVENTS SHOULD STAY THE SAME. NO CHANGES SHOULD BE MADE. SHOULD THE LAR ACTUALLY BE CALLED THE LIAR? I DO NOT FAVOR THESE PROPOSED CHANGES. THEY CAN BRING ABOUT FRAUD, WHICH IS ALREADY HIGH IN THIS DEPT. GAO AUDITED SOME USDA PROGRAMS AND FOUND 50% FRAUD IN THIS DEPT. THE DESIGNATION PROCESS SHOULD REMAIN AT SIX STEPS, NOT GO TO 2 STEPS. I DON OT AGREE THAT DROUGHT REQUIRES A MORE "SIMPLIFIED" STEPS THAN THAT. I DO NOT AGREE THAT REMOVING THE GOVERNOR BEING THE ONE TO NAME A DISASTER. THE PROCESS INPLACE SHOULD STAY IN PLACE. A DISASTER PRONOUNCEMENT SHOULD COME FROM A GOVERNOR, NOT FROM THIS AGENCY, WHICH ALWAYS SEEKS TO PLEASE ONLY ITS CONSTITUENTS.IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOT "SIMPLIFY" THESE PROCESSES SINCE MORE FRAUD WILL RESULT. WE NEED MORE INFO BEFORE PAYING OUT TAX DOLLARS NOT LESS. IS SOME GROUP LOOKING TO MAKE A KILLING HERE ON TAXPAYER DOLLARS. WE ALL NEED TO BE MORE CAREFUL AND MORE RIGOUROUS NOT LESS RIGOROUS.THE TAXPAYERS ARE BEING FORCED INTO BANKRUPTCY WITH HIGH TAXES FOR GOVT PROGRAMS THAT GROW AND GROW AND GROW, CAUSING AMERICA TO BE IN A TOTALLY DEFICIT SITUATION. THIS WILL CAUSE THAT TO HAPPEN MORE. THIS PROPOSAL SHOULD BE TOTALLY DENIED.
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-29011
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Disaster Designation Process
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 01/17/2012 ID: FSA-2012-0003-0002
Jan 13,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/17/2012 ID: FSA-2012-0003-0004
Jan 13,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/17/2012 ID: FSA-2012-0003-0005
Jan 13,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/17/2012 ID: FSA-2012-0003-0006
Jan 13,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/17/2012 ID: FSA-2012-0003-0007
Jan 13,2012 11:59 PM ET