Comment from Walter Hill

Document ID: FSIS-2010-0023-0011
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Food Safety And Inspection Service
Received Date: December 01 2011, at 03:04 PM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: December 2 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: November 23 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: December 21 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80f78e38
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Although broadening the scope of adulterant serotypes is a step in the right direction, I feel that relying on serotype, a feature that is only indirectly associated with a bacterial strain’s potential for virulence in humans is last century’s technology. While serotyping has served us well, now is the time to progress to looking directly at which virulence factors might be harbored by a given strain. While the eae and stx genes might not be the only requirements to cause disease in humans, they certainly play a role. It is not clear that the presence of these genes in the TOP SIX E. coli serogroups make strains more virulent than if they occur in other serogroups. Therefore, I would ask that FSIS consider investigating the impact on food safety of screening meat products for these genes and not limiting adulteration to the presence of now these seven (including O157) serogroups.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 28
Comment from James Hodges
Public Submission    Posted: 12/02/2011     ID: FSIS-2010-0023-0010

Dec 21,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Walter Hill
Public Submission    Posted: 12/02/2011     ID: FSIS-2010-0023-0011

Dec 21,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Chris Waldrop
Public Submission    Posted: 12/08/2011     ID: FSIS-2010-0023-0013

Dec 21,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Ian Jenson
Public Submission    Posted: 12/08/2011     ID: FSIS-2010-0023-0014

Dec 21,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Brynn Kepler
Public Submission    Posted: 12/08/2011     ID: FSIS-2010-0023-0015

Dec 21,2011 11:59 PM ET