Comment on FR Doc # N/A

Document ID: FWS-R9-MB-2008-0103-0006
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Fish And Wildlife Service
Received Date: October 08 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: October 12 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: September 21 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: December 20 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80b6b8b4
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I am concerned about the disparity between between what is required of non AZA facilities regarding reporting. It would appear that the organization has to track every time each individual biofact (non-living specimen) is used in a program for reporting purposes. When you deliver a large number of programs or reach a large audience with on-site demonstration or touch carts this becomes quite cumbersome. I am not sure how being an AZA accredited facility would require this potentially onerous level of record keeping and reporting, why a nature center or non-accredited museum or zoo could not be trusted.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 65
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-23342
Public Submission    Posted: 09/27/2010     ID: FWS-R9-MB-2008-0103-0002

Dec 20,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-23342
Public Submission    Posted: 10/04/2010     ID: FWS-R9-MB-2008-0103-0003

Dec 20,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-23342
Public Submission    Posted: 10/04/2010     ID: FWS-R9-MB-2008-0103-0004

Dec 20,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-23342
Public Submission    Posted: 10/04/2010     ID: FWS-R9-MB-2008-0103-0005

Dec 20,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # N/A
Public Submission    Posted: 10/12/2010     ID: FWS-R9-MB-2008-0103-0006

Dec 20,2010 11:59 PM ET