Comment Submitted by Nancy Kenyon, Fair Housing of Marin

Document ID: HUD-2011-0138-0008
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Department Of Housing And Urban Development
Received Date: December 29 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 4 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: November 16 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: January 17 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80f8ae81
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

As an advocate for equal opportunity in housing, I am writing in strong support of HUD’s proposed regulation implementing the Fair Housing Act’s discriminatory effects standard. Fair Housing of Marin is a civil rights nonprofit founded in 1982 that serves the county of Marin in Clifornia. We counsel victims of discrimination, provide legal seminar to Landlords, counsel individuals on forclosure, advocate for affordable housing and fun human rights programs in the area schools. We believe that People Learn to Live Together by Living Together and work to make sure every individual protected by the federal and state fair housing laws live in the housing of their choice. HUD’s proposed regulation is an important and necessary step in ensuring that the nation’s housing is available to all, regardless of protected class status. In our work, we have encountered many examples of housing practices that are neutral on the surface, but destructive to the mission of fostering equal opportunity. One such example is numerical occupancy limitations. When such limitations are imposed by housing providers, they may have the effect of excluding families with minor children from housing. This effect, even if not intended by the housing provider, runs counter to the goals of the Fair Housing Act. Another is zoning and land-use restrictions containing limitations based on the household composition. Such zoning restrictions may prevent people with disabilities or handicaps from living together in financially viable and therapeutic group settings. This effect, even if not intended by the municipal agency, runs counter to the goals of the Fair Housing Act. Finally, Marin County is 84% Caucasian. When affordable housing projects are built, many cities decided to give preference to current residents, which meant that non-Whites were virtually eliminated. Our agency met with these cities and persuaded them that their policy was in violation of fair housing laws by disparate impac

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 96
Comment Submitted by Theresa Sparks, San Francisco Human Rights Commission
Public Submission    Posted: 11/22/2011     ID: HUD-2011-0138-0003

Jan 17,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Joshua Brewster
Public Submission    Posted: 11/30/2011     ID: HUD-2011-0138-0004

Jan 17,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Cierra Jordan
Public Submission    Posted: 12/06/2011     ID: HUD-2011-0138-0006

Jan 17,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Mary Prem, Housing Equality Law Project (HELP)
Public Submission    Posted: 12/29/2011     ID: HUD-2011-0138-0007

Jan 17,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Nancy Kenyon, Fair Housing of Marin
Public Submission    Posted: 01/04/2012     ID: HUD-2011-0138-0008

Jan 17,2012 11:59 PM ET