I disagree with your preposed limit for the maximum possible period for which a unit can be under a project-based voucher contract to 30 years. All stakeholders agree that this is contrary to the statute, which permits a potentially unlimited number of 15-year contract extensions. These extensions need to continue.
· The preamble to the proposed rule states the intent to provide tenants with a reliable long-term lease unless an owner has a “good cause” to terminate or not renew a lease. However, one paragraph of the proposed regulatory text continues to allow an owner to terminate a lease without good cause.I strongly disagree with this preposed added text,persons on Housing Voucher Section 8 have enough issues with Bias, and targeted as undesiarable tennents by Landloards. This addidtion to allow Terination with out good cause opens a pandoras box for discrimination, homlessness. Persons such as myself NEED PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW NOT LESS. PLEASE DO NOT ADD THIS PARAGRAPH !
· I Advocate to endorse a provision which would require owners to provide tenants with a one-year notice of intent to not renew a project-based voucher contract.
Comment Submitted by Bonnie Brampton
This is comment on Proposed Rule
FR–5242–P–01 The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA): Changes to the Section 8 Tenant-Based Voucher and Section 8 Project-Based Voucher Programs
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 05/21/2012 ID: HUD-2012-0049-0002
Jul 16,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/09/2012 ID: HUD-2012-0049-0003
Jul 16,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/12/2012 ID: HUD-2012-0049-0006
Jul 16,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/13/2012 ID: HUD-2012-0049-0007
Jul 16,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/16/2012 ID: HUD-2012-0049-0008
Jul 16,2012 11:59 PM ET