Comment from CYRIL GONZALES

Document ID: NOAA-NMFS-2010-0281-0079
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration
Received Date: March 10 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: March 16 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: March 10 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: March 25 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80c05666
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Re-Opening of Comment Period for Amberjack

View Comment

I am a diver and can vouch for the fact that the Amberjack population is healthy because I see personally witness that fact. I also dispute that 2010 effort caused the recreational sector to go over their quota. The data is flawed and I dispute those numbers. If you feel its adventagous to close Amberjack, the closure should occur during their spawning season in February and March top protect the new stock. The closure in the middle of the summer needlessly closes the season and effects all fishermen by elimination an entire species. The rules on AJ are already so strict, only one fish can be harvested per person. With gas prices going up, I find it hard to believe that one fish per person is causing over fishing. I think we can all agree that the data is flawed when determining the amount of fish being landed by the recreational sector. The population is healthy and one fish per person by a recreational fisherman that only fishes twich per month on a saturday cannot possibly be enough to exceed our qouta. The data incorrectly assumes many fishermen are fishing multiple times per year. The fact is that we all have jobs and can only fish on occasional weekends. The date assumes we make multiple trips weekls with limits caught each time. Please dont close Amberjack during the summer. Effort is already down because of gas prices and one fish per person is not excessive. Its a shame that the date thinks we are landing several AJ's per month which is untrue.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 57
Comment from Ron Strich
Public Submission    Posted: 03/16/2011     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2010-0281-0069

Mar 25,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Don McPherson
Public Submission    Posted: 03/16/2011     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2010-0281-0070

Mar 25,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Mark Miller
Public Submission    Posted: 03/16/2011     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2010-0281-0071

Mar 25,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from John Hexter
Public Submission    Posted: 03/16/2011     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2010-0281-0072

Mar 25,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Doug Wilson
Public Submission    Posted: 03/16/2011     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2010-0281-0073

Mar 25,2011 11:59 PM ET