Comment from Timothy Lehman

Document ID: NOAA-NMFS-2011-0273-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration
Received Date: November 30 2011, at 02:09 PM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: December 5 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: November 30 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: December 30 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80f77590
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Rather than transfer unused IFQ shares to other IFQ holders, why not increase the bag limit of the recreational sector? After all, studies have proven the recreational sector generates way more economic benefit per pound of fish harvested than the commercial sector. Regards, Tim

Related Comments

   
Total: 5
Comment from thomas Adams
Public Submission    Posted: 12/05/2011     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2011-0273-0002

Dec 30,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Timothy Lehman
Public Submission    Posted: 12/05/2011     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2011-0273-0003

Dec 30,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from thomas Adams
Public Submission    Posted: 12/05/2011     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2011-0273-0004

Dec 30,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from w btm
Public Submission    Posted: 12/21/2011     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2011-0273-0005

Dec 30,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from David Dewberry
Public Submission    Posted: 01/03/2012     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2011-0273-0006

Dec 30,2011 11:59 PM ET