Comment from Tim Palmer

Document ID: NOAA-NMFS-2013-0026-0079
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration
Received Date: May 08 2013, at 10:59 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: May 9 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: March 22 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: May 8 2013, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jx-8582-6w16
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

(cont.) Conversely, the only thing that would help keep the balance that has been struck in the South Florida region from Key West to about Ft. Pierce would be a zero retention limit. While this may seem ridiculous to some, the very small area that is already extremely congested with permitted handgear and recreational fishermen simply has reached a saturation point . Creating an economic incentive will only make this worse. Another thing worth mentioning is that an open access fishery for swordfish will allow many, who could not qualify for a restricted species endorsement on the Florida saltwater products license, to easily be able to do so. This will create more pressure on inshore species such as Spanish mackerel and pompano. The Florida Wildlife Commission made it hard to get a RS endorsement by allowing very few fish that could be sold with just a SPL. They did this for the reason of keeping the number RS holders to a manageable level. Allowing the sale of swordfish would create a loophole making it easier for sportfishermen to obtain this endorsement. One problem that is evident is the pitiful lack of enforcement in the South Fl. region. There is nothing that I see in the alternatives that would curb the black market sales here. If anything, it will create an environment that will make it easier for recreationally caught fish to be sold by increasing the number of outlets through which the fish could be offloaded. It seems a folly to me to reward widespread the non-compliance that we have witnessed here in this region with the issuance of an open access permit. Once again the only thing that will truly work for this very special area is zero retention. I wish to thank you for taking the time to read this. I think that it is possible to strike a balance between increasing our landings in a responsible way without severely impacting the current participants. Thank you for your careful consideration. Best Regards ,Tim Palmer

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 24
Comment from Jean LeComte
Public Submission    Posted: 04/05/2013     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2013-0026-0042

May 08,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Steve Weiner
Public Submission    Posted: 04/05/2013     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2013-0026-0043

May 08,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Gregory Walinski
Public Submission    Posted: 04/05/2013     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2013-0026-0044

May 08,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Russell Hudson
Public Submission    Posted: 05/07/2013     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2013-0026-0065

May 08,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Tim Palmer
Public Submission    Posted: 05/09/2013     ID: NOAA-NMFS-2013-0026-0079

May 08,2013 11:59 PM ET