99-23471. Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 767 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 15, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 49977-49979]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-23471]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-NM-278-AD; Amendment 39-11316; AD 99-19-29]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 767 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain Boeing Model 767 series airplanes, that requires 
    repetitive inspections of certain H-11 tension bolts at each side-of-
    body kick-load fitting and on the lower splice plate (both located on 
    the wing rear spar) to detect damaged or broken bolts; and follow-on 
    actions, if necessary. This amendment also requires eventual 
    replacement of the existing bolts with new, improved bolts, which 
    constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections. This 
    amendment is prompted by a report that an operator found two broken H-
    11 tension bolts on the side-of-body kick-load fitting on one airplane. 
    The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent cracking of 
    the bolts due to stress corrosion, which could result in reduced 
    structural integrity of the wing-to-body joint structure.
    
    DATES: Effective October 20, 1999.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of October 20, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, 
    Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal 
    Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules 
    Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of 
    the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James G. Rehrl, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Seattle 
    Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2783; fax (425) 227-1181.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 767 series 
    airplanes was published in the Federal Register on November 23, 1998 
    (63 FR 64657). That action proposed to require repetitive inspections 
    of certain H-11 tension bolts at each side-of-body kick-load fitting 
    and on the lower splice plate (both located on the wing rear spar) to 
    detect damaged, broken, or improperly sealed bolts; and follow-on 
    actions, if necessary. That action also proposed to require eventual 
    replacement of the existing bolts with new, improved bolts, which 
    constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections.
    
    Comments
    
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the four comments received.
        Two commenters support the proposed rule, and one commenter does 
    not object to the proposed rule.
    
    Editorial Changes to the Final Rule
    
        The FAA has determined that it is necessary to clarify the detailed 
    visual inspection of paragraph (a)(1) of the requirements of this AD. 
    The FAA has added the words ``of the bolts,'' to further clarify the 
    inspection area. The final rule has been changed accordingly.
    
    Request to Delete Certain Descriptive Language
    
        One commenter, the manufacturer, requests that the FAA delete the 
    words ``improperly sealed'' from paragraphs (a) and (b) of the proposed 
    AD. The commenter states that because the most significant influence of 
    the H-11 bolt fracture is the presence of high pre-load, which cannot 
    be determined by inspection, any anomalies in the bolt sealant will 
    have no effect on the bolt fracture, unless the bolt is highly pre-
    loaded. The commenter also suggests that using the condition of the H-
    11 bolt sealant as a guide for bolt replacement will cause unnecessary, 
    unscheduled airplane down time and confusion, as it is likely that 
    improperly sealed bolts will be found. The commenter further adds that 
    a clear definition of an ``improperly sealed bolt'' is not provided in 
    either the Boeing Service Bulletin or the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
    (NPRM).
        The FAA concurs with the request to delete certain descriptive 
    language of the AD, as requested by the commenter. The FAA has revised 
    this language throughout the final rule.
    
    Request to Revise the Compliance Time for the Terminating Action
    
        One commenter requests that the FAA revise the proposed compliance 
    time for the terminating action from 6,000 flight cycles to 9,000 
    flight cycles. The commenter states that the issue of H-11 bolts 
    fracture is more dependent on calendar time rather than flight cycles. 
    This additional allowance of time would provide high cycle usage 
    operators an equivalent of 48 months calendar time that is provided for 
    low cycle usage operators.
        The FAA concurs with this request, and has revised paragraph (c) of 
    the final rule accordingly.
    
    Explanation of Change Made to Proposal
    
        The FAA has added a note to the final rule to clarify the 
    definition of a detailed visual inspection.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously 
    described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        There are approximately 177 Model 767 series airplanes of the 
    affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 70 
    airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD.
        It will take approximately 2 work hours per airplane to accomplish 
    the required inspection of the kick-load fitting, at an average labor 
    rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of 
    the inspection of the kick-load fitting required by this AD on U.S. 
    operators is estimated to be $8,400, or $120 per airplane, per 
    inspection cycle.
        It will take approximately 23 work hours per airplane to accomplish 
    the required inspection of the splice plate, at an average labor rate 
    of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the 
    inspection of the splice plate required by this AD on U.S.
    
    [[Page 49978]]
    
    operators is estimated to be $96,600, or $1,380 per airplane, per 
    inspection cycle.
        It will take approximately 140 work hours per airplane to 
    accomplish the required replacement, at an average labor rate of $60 
    per work hour. Parts will be provided by the manufacturer at no cost to 
    the operators. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the 
    replacement required by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
    $588,000, or $8,400 per airplane.
        The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions 
    that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this 
    AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
    future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    99-19-29  Boeing: Amendment 39-11316. Docket 98-NM-278-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 767 series airplanes, line positions 1 
    through 177 inclusive, certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent cracking of the H-11 tension bolts on the side-of-
    body kick-load fitting due to stress corrosion, which could result 
    in reduced structural integrity of the wing-to-body joint structure, 
    accomplish the following:
        (a) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD: Perform 
    a detailed visual inspection of the four H-11 tension bolts at each 
    side-of-body kick-load fitting located on the wing rear spar to 
    detect damaged or broken bolts; and accomplish the requirements in 
    either paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this AD, in accordance with the 
    Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 767-57A0064, 
    Revision 1, dated July 9, 1998.
        (1) Option 1: Repeat the detailed visual inspection of the bolts 
    at each side-of-body kick-load fitting thereafter at intervals not 
    to exceed 90 days, until accomplishment of the actions specified in 
    paragraph (c) of this AD. Or
        (2) Option 2: Perform a detailed visual inspection of the four 
    H-11 tension bolts on the lower splice plate located on the wing 
    rear spar to detect damaged or broken bolts. Repeat the detailed 
    inspection of each side-of-body kick-load fitting and the lower 
    splice plate thereafter at intervals not to exceed 18 months, until 
    accomplishment of the actions specified in paragraph (c) of this AD.
    
        Note 2: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual 
    inspection is defined as: ``An intensive visual examination of a 
    specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to 
    detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is 
    normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at 
    intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such 
    as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc. may be used. Surface cleaning and 
    elaborate access procedures may be required.''
    
        (b) If evidence of any damaged or broken bolt is detected, prior 
    to further flight, replace the discrepant bolt with a new, improved 
    bolt in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 767-57A0064, 
    Revision 1, dated July 9, 1998. Thereafter, repeat the detailed 
    inspection in either paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this AD, as 
    applicable, until accomplishment of the actions specified in 
    paragraph (c) of this AD.
        (c) Within 9,000 flight cycles or 48 months after the effective 
    date of this AD, whichever occurs first, replace all four H-11 
    tension bolts at each side-of-body kick-load fitting with new, 
    improved bolts, and perform a detailed visual inspection to detect 
    any damaged or broken bolt of the lower splice plate located on the 
    wing rear spar, in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 767-
    57A0064, Revision 1, dated July 9, 1998. If any damaged or broken 
    bolt is detected during the inspection, prior to further flight, 
    replace the discrepant bolt with a new, improved bolt in accordance 
    with Boeing Service Bulletin 767-57A0064, Revision 1, dated July 9, 
    1998. Accomplishment of the actions specified in this paragraph 
    constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection 
    requirements of this AD.
    
    Alternative Methods of Compliance
    
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Seattle ACO.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Seattle ACO.
    
    Special Flight Permits
    
        (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
    Incorporation by Reference
    
        (f) The inspections and replacements shall be done in accordance 
    with Boeing Service Bulletin 767-57A0064, Revision 1, dated July 9, 
    1998. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director 
    of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 
    part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane 
    Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be 
    inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 
    Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal 
    Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (g) This amendment becomes effective on October 20, 1999.
    
    
    [[Page 49979]]
    
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 2, 1999.
    Dorenda D. Baker,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-23471 Filed 9-14-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
10/20/1999
Published:
09/15/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-23471
Dates:
Effective October 20, 1999.
Pages:
49977-49979 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-NM-278-AD, Amendment 39-11316, AD 99-19-29
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-23471.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13