I am against the proposed rule to impose restrictions on private owners who rent their propeties out for season, by the week, month, year, etc... The responsibility lies with the parent or guardian of the child to oversee and protect their welfare, and should NOT lie with a landlord, out of sight and in no direct control of that child. Even if protections were implemented, it is no guarantee of safety...if a parent is not properly monitoring and caring for the child, anything can happen, the child can wander off and be hit by a car, bit by a dog, or worse, kidnapped...
By passing these rules, you are going to limit the landlord's ability to rent to people with children, or even people with grandchildren, because of the liability involved and the costs involved to implement these additional safety requirements. Most counties already have in place rules relating to the construction of pools, so why the additional rules? Also, if you try implement these rules regarding a pool, what about properties on the water? Are you going to require fences and barriers to obstruct views, and access to these types of propertie because they are potentially dangerous to children? You can take this even further by even suggesting that properties with stairs be required to have barriers so children will not fall down these stairs...in other words, leave us alone, and let the parents parent, the government is restrictive enough.
Comment from Cindy Smith
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act; Public Accommodation
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 10/27/2010 ID: CPSC-2010-0102-0003
Dec 21,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/27/2010 ID: CPSC-2010-0102-0004
Dec 21,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/04/2010 ID: CPSC-2010-0102-0007
Dec 21,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/16/2010 ID: CPSC-2010-0102-0009
Dec 21,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/30/2010 ID: CPSC-2010-0102-0010
Dec 21,2010 11:59 PM ET