Regarding: Date of filing requirements have been moved from Section
501.3(d)(3) to paragraph (f) and include more extensive discussion of
these requirements to assist Appellants. The new language in (f)(i)
replaces language currently found in 501.10(c) by acknowledging that
commercial delivery services may be used by Appellants in place of the
U.S. Mail Service, but only the date of receipt by the Clerk will then
be used to determine timeliness. If, however, the U.S. Mail Service is
used, the Board will continue to look to the date of mailing to
establish timeliness if the date of receipt by the Clerk would make the
appeal untimely
COMMENT:
Commercial delivery of the appeal is accepted but for purposes of filing date
there is a discrepancy between the commercial carrier and the US mail (United
States Postal Service, USPS). Some commercial carriers provide very explicit
tracking which includes date received by the carrier and a listing of where the
package is currently. Why the need for discrepancy between USPS and
Commercial
carriers? It appears to be unnecessary detriment to appellants when they can
present proof to be weighed by the Board which may be equal to the USPS proof.
Section 501.3 (f)(i): Comment from Sylvia Johnson, Administrative Law Representative
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Rules of Procedure
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 06/27/2008 ID: ECAB-2008-0001-0002
Aug 19,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/09/2008 ID: ECAB-2008-0001-0004
Aug 19,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/23/2008 ID: ECAB-2008-0001-0005
Aug 19,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/23/2008 ID: ECAB-2008-0001-0006
Aug 19,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/23/2008 ID: ECAB-2008-0001-0007
Aug 19,2008 11:59 PM ET