I have a certified abatement co.. we just we recieved training for the rrp rule. FRom our experience with abatement which in our terms window replacement door replacement or any part of the property remuved that tests positive for lead we consider it abatement. With proper procedures taken and dust wipe samples and lab testing we still have failed clearances sometimes. the swiffer mop is not the answer. I strongly urge your implemation of this amendment. It would definitely take some liability off the contractor and leave a much more secure feeling about the finished job. this action would requre a much thourough cleaning. make our children safe
Comment submitted by R. Epperson
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Clearance and Clearance Testing Requirements for the Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program: Lead
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 05/07/2010 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-1138
Jul 06,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/07/2010 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-1139
Jul 06,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/07/2010 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-1140
Jul 06,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/14/2010 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-1143
Jul 06,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/14/2010 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-1144
Jul 06,2010 11:59 PM ET