Ron Lee

1) Reference this wording: "Bear the cost of building and maintaining the infrastructure the sponsor determines is necessary to provide access to the airfield from property located adjacent to or near the airport;" Response: At our airport access costs are borne by the residents. This wording is too open-ended in that the "sponsor" could dictate that access be via gold lined taxiways. 2) Reference this wording: "Through-the-fence residents utilizing this access, by avigation easement; deed covenants, conditions or restrictions; or other agreement, have acknowledged that the property will be affected by aircraft noise and emissions and that aircraft noise and emissions may change over time. Through-the-fence residents utilizing this access have waived any right to bring an action against the sponsor for existing and future operations and activities at the airport associated with aircraft noise and emissions." Response: As with the first comment, this is too open-ended. This agreement would allow the use of my airport as a nightime war game area with military jets using afterburners at low level, or all regional flight schools using this one airport to conduct intrusive operations.