Easyjet Airline Co. Ltd.

Document ID: FAA-2012-1114-0002
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: January 29 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 29 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: January 14 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: March 15 2013, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jx-83dt-rjvp
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

After review of the proposed AD, comparison to the equivalent EASA AD, review of other technical information and in-service experience we suggest that the applicability and inspection requirements should be refined to take into account the frequency of exposure to TS-1 or equivalent fuels. Many operators may uplift TS-1 fuel but this may be infrequent on a given aircraft, where the predominant uplifts are for non-TS1 fuel types. The equivalent EASA document is only applicable to operators with an AOC based in a state where TS-1 fuel is the predominant fuel type and where TS1 is regularly uplifted. We suggest that infrequent uplift of TS1 fuel places less risk to the component than the additional maintenance and administration burden (and therefore opportunity for error) requested by this proposed rule, and therefore ask that this is taken into account.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 8
TAP Portugal
Public Submission    Posted: 02/04/2013     ID: FAA-2012-1114-0004

Mar 15,2013 11:59 PM ET
Easyjet Airline Co. Ltd.
Public Submission    Posted: 01/29/2013     ID: FAA-2012-1114-0002

Mar 15,2013 11:59 PM ET
Air France
Public Submission    Posted: 02/20/2013     ID: FAA-2012-1114-0005

Mar 15,2013 11:59 PM ET
Lufthansa Technik AG/Deutsche Lufthansa AG
Public Submission    Posted: 02/27/2013     ID: FAA-2012-1114-0006

Mar 15,2013 11:59 PM ET
CFM International
Public Submission    Posted: 03/08/2013     ID: FAA-2012-1114-0007

Mar 15,2013 11:59 PM ET