Attachment

Document ID: PHMSA-2007-0065-0017
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Pipeline And Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Received Date: September 25 2008, at 10:10 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: September 25 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: July 31 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: September 29 2008, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 807239be
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

The National Air Carrier Association (NACA) , on behalf of its ten member airlines is pleased to have the opportunity to comment on the Hazardous Materials, Batteries and Battery-Powered Devices Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). Our comments are as follows: 1. Sections 173.162, 173.164, 173.166, 173.186, 173.306, 173.307: The requirement to indicate "Not Restricted" on the Air Waybill is good, and consistent with current IATA requirements; however, in many cases it is not the "consignor" who is preparing the bill, rather it is the freight forwarder or the operator. In this case, the idea that this statement allows the forwarder or operator "to verify that the consignor is aware of, and has complied with, the applicable regulatory requirements" does not hold true. Perhaps a requirement for the consignor to submit written verification to the forwarder/operator that the consignment has been determined "Not Restricted", and/or the forwarder/operator to verify "Not Restricted" by citing the current regulatory requirements and requiring the consignor to endorse same on the AWB would be more effective. 2. Section 175.75: The proposed allowance for CAO shipments to be loaded in a cargo compartment with smoke/fire detection/suppression makes good sense for all hazard classes except Class 8. A leaking corrosive substance would then not be discovered until substantial damage has possibly been done to the aircraft and/or other cargo. In keeping with the other provisions of Section 175.75, this could allow 25L of a CAO corrosive liquid to be loaded in each inaccessible compartment - enough to do a lot of damage. 3. In regard to section 172. 159a requiring removal of a non spillable battery and placement in packaging marked "NONSPILLABLE BATTERY" we believe this would require air carriers to purchase new containers to meet this requirement. Some of our carriers currently only keep on hand containers marked "Battery, wet with wheelchair" and "Corrosive" so the requirement for non- spillable battery containers would require additional purchase and stocking of a sufficient number to meet a possible need at multiple locations. We appreciate your consideration of our views in this process. Sincerely, ____________________________ Ty Prettyman Director, Technical Operations National Air Carrier Association

Attachments:

National Air Carrier Association - Comment

Title:
National Air Carrier Association - Comment

View Attachment: View as format pdf

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 19
Anne B. Whittemore - Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 08/26/2008     ID: PHMSA-2007-0065-0012

Sep 29,2008 11:59 PM ET
Attachment
Public Submission    Posted: 09/10/2008     ID: PHMSA-2007-0065-0013

Sep 29,2008 11:59 PM ET
Anthony R. Filiato - Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 09/19/2008     ID: PHMSA-2007-0065-0014

Sep 29,2008 11:59 PM ET
Omni Air International - Comments
Public Submission    Posted: 09/22/2008     ID: PHMSA-2007-0065-0015

Sep 29,2008 11:59 PM ET
Attachment
Public Submission    Posted: 09/25/2008     ID: PHMSA-2007-0065-0017

Sep 29,2008 11:59 PM ET