I am a retired dispatcher (37 years experience) and former President of IFALDA (International Federation of Air Line Dispatchers Associations - 4 two-year terms).
I strongly support this proposed rule with emphasis on the following: Because of the overwhelming appearance of conflict of interest I strongly urge that DADEs not only be prohibited from being employees of Part 65 dispatcher courses but also from owning equity in or being a contract employee of a Part 65 course. I also urge that DADEs be current and qualified as Aircraft Dispatchers by working either as dispatchers at a Part 121 certificate holder or be in a peripheral operational control support position at a Part 121 certificate holder. Also, DADEs must not operate beyond the privileges and limitations in their Certificate Letter of Authority (CLOA) issued by the local FAA district office nor may DADEs operate beyond the jurisdiction of the local overseeing office without the written approval of AFS-200. Lastly, DADEs must only be managed by FAA Aircraft Dispatcher Aviation Safety Inspectors who have explicit knowledge of the dispatch profession and certification requirements.
David Porter
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Clarification of Policy Regarding Designated Aircraft Dispatcher Examiners
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 11/09/2011 ID: FAA-2011-1149-0007
Dec 08,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/30/2011 ID: FAA-2011-1149-0009
Dec 08,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/08/2011 ID: FAA-2011-1149-0010
Dec 08,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/09/2011 ID: FAA-2011-1149-0013
Dec 08,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/12/2011 ID: FAA-2011-1149-0014
Dec 08,2011 11:59 PM ET