Comment on FR Doc # 2010-32019

Document ID: NLRB-2010-0011-0007
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: National Labor Relations Board
Received Date: December 22 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: December 22 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 22 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: February 22 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80bbe069
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

It is my belief that the Board does not have the authority to impose the notification requirements of the proposed Rule. Even if it were determined that this authority is granted, either expressly or implied, the proposed rule is discrimanatory, at best. By only requiring employers to post the rights of workers to be represented by, or collective bargain with a Union or other group of their choice, it does not, conversely, require the posting of an employee's right to not be so represented. Employees who are currently represented by a collective bargaining group have just as much a need to be aware of their rights as they pertain to the NLRA as those that are currently not represented.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 6,120
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-32019
Public Submission    Posted: 12/22/2010     ID: NLRB-2010-0011-0002

Feb 22,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-32019
Public Submission    Posted: 12/22/2010     ID: NLRB-2010-0011-0003

Feb 22,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-32019
Public Submission    Posted: 12/22/2010     ID: NLRB-2010-0011-0005

Feb 22,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-32019
Public Submission    Posted: 12/22/2010     ID: NLRB-2010-0011-0006

Feb 22,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-32019
Public Submission    Posted: 12/22/2010     ID: NLRB-2010-0011-0007

Feb 22,2011 11:59 PM ET