You are making a decision that is based on media articles and outdated information. There are many more thousands of social security recipients who could use this change for a better life then are doing it because their financial planner said to. If you are so concerned about the "free loan", make any recipient pay a reasonable interest rate on the money and not be able to take a tax deduction for the payment. Furthermore, if you are going to make this change, it should be at some date in the future, not immediately. I believe that governmental employees are not covered by social security, so you are making changes for many thousands of people and you are not affected by this change. How about a "level playing field", not one with inherrant bias. I repeat, make the change take effect at some date in the future: 6 months, 12 months, but not retroactively.
Comment from grumet, larry, interested party
This is comment on Rule
Amendments to Regulations Regarding WIthdrawal of Applications and Voluntary Suspension of Benefits
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 12/10/2010 ID: SSA-2009-0073-0003
Feb 07,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/10/2010 ID: SSA-2009-0073-0005
Feb 07,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/10/2010 ID: SSA-2009-0073-0006
Feb 07,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/10/2010 ID: SSA-2009-0073-0007
Feb 07,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/10/2010 ID: SSA-2009-0073-0008
Feb 07,2011 11:59 PM ET